Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)

28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 25 activities · Apr 2026

A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.

What people say

Received · 28 Given · 241

“another shitcoin spammer”It's 2026 - every single word in the dictionary is a shitcoin on solana and apparently you can't tweet anything without retards spamming CAs in your mentions. https://x.com/R0GER_B1/status/2090161825316745239 https://x.com/R0GER_B1/status/2090142576825221169 Just because my tweet includes a word that's also some shitcoin on solana you're bagholding, it doesn't mean I want you to spam tickers and CAs under my tweets.

on ROGER B-1 战斗机器人 (malware arc) · 1184· 59d ago · negative80

“sybil, toxic behavior, retaliatory reviews full of lies”I already reviewed this account in the past for sybil patterns and toxic behavior: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/707608/sybil-toxic-behavior Now we got some more toxic behavior, retaliatory reviews, and playing the victim while lying what happened - but Gojo apparently forgot screenshot technology exists 😹 What happened: 1) I saw ZETs research into this account and it's sybil patterns. 2) Analyzed the account myself, and also looked at the data ZET provided. Came to the same conclusion. (Don't trust, verify = a mindset I follow.) 3) At this point in time, I haven't left a negative review for this account. ZET already did great research into the sybil patterns and documented it well (https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/706089/sybil-patterns) 4) Then I noticed this account being incredibly toxic in the ethos discord. Out of 56 messages he sent, 29 messages were tagging people to look at the drama this account was creating. 5) This account was progressively getting more toxic. Kept tagging people 29 times, calling me a ZET sybil (lol) and stirring up drama - pointlessly trying to change ZETs mind and get him human verified. As if the toxic behavior would suddenly change his mind? LOL 6) I've mentioned that with every passing second and toxic message, me abstaining from negatively reviewing this account, is gonna change. https://imgur.com/a/oH0Nrvu 7) This account said he will leave a retaliatory review if I drop him a negative for the toxic behavior and sybil patterns. 8) The account called ZET an idiot, then deleted it. Screenshots exist. https://imgur.com/a/wnMjBYn 9) At this point Gojo got a fully deserved negative review from me - the one linked at the start of this review. 10) Now Gojo has left a retaliatory review. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/708110/ In the retaliatory review, Gojo is claiming to be the victim. He claims that no independent research was done - when ZET and I both independently came to the same conclusion of ultra strong sybil patterns. (And I even abstained from immediately giving him a negative at that point - until he became ultra toxic.) He claims that he was the one being called an idiot. I think he forgot that there is this little thing called "screenshot". https://imgur.com/a/wnMjBYn And oh boy, it actually shows him calling people idiots? Amazing. Sorry Gojo, but deleting your message and then playing the victim isn't going to pass. The few other points mentioned in Gojo's retaliatory negative were debunked in the comments: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/707608?replyId=70366 The funniest part is "labels me as toxic because I disagreed with it." Your behavior is toxic, and that has nothing to do with whether we agree or disagree. You were calling people idiots. Then deleting it. And now, in your retaliatory review you left me, falsely claiming you were the one being called an idiot. I label you as toxic because you are toxic. And you keep being toxic. And now you also lie trying to paint yourself as the victim. Get a grip dude.

on GOJO.base.eth · 1054· 4mo ago · negative170

“essay length AI slop reviews farming daily bounties”For the past month every single review this account has left has been getting longer and longer and longer. Now it's at the point of every review being a 3000+ characters useless AI slop essay. On every single daily bounty. Stop copy pasting novel-length AI slop in your daily bounties!

on DaUnknown · 1241· 4mo ago · negative261

“fake jen begging for money”This is not the real Jen. This is someone pretending to be Jen and spamming DMs begging for money. They've been doing it for quite a while now, and as of last week they are still spamming mutuals and asking for money with the same old story. This is NOT Jen. Do not give this grifter any money.

on Jen · 1185· 53d ago · negative135

“review slop, incentivized reviews”Noticed the vibestarter review in the feed: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/700709/positive-on-their-journey If you open up the vibestarter profile, you will notice that review is 1:1 copy of serpins review. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/693056/cyphr-is-a-legit-dev-maybe-misunderstood-practices This account hasn't been active on ethos for a while. Their last review was made only because of vibestarter review incentives + it's 1:1 copied from Serpin. Yikes. Previously this account was leaving very obvious AI reviews as well. A few AI examples - those are quite old as the account wasn't active until it was incentivized to leave a positive review for vibestarter: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/398285/honestly-admire-her-leadership https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/394106/the-future-of-gaming https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/330798/a-crypto-leader

on 🐺🐺 sullivan · 1303· 6mo ago · negative160

“good bot”Saving tweets onchain & on user profiles is highly useful. Been using Ethos Agent to save a variety of tweets for a long time now.

on Ethos Agent · 1365· 2d ago128

“Ethereum Maxis - fka Alucard”Saw this account on my timeline posting that "Ethereum maximalism is how crypto will rise again." and then I saw the ethos score. Right message, wrong messenger. You can see who Alucard is by browsing some of the past reviews. The rebranded account tweeted this at some point: >After a successful private acquisition, this account is now under new management. Old Alucard has been escorted off the premises. ~ https://x.com/i/status/2047365307652804882 I highly doubt anyone would purchase this particular account lol But either way, that behavior is prohibited on Twitter. >Not Allowed >Trading, buying, selling (either through monetary or virtual compensation) or soliciting access of X accounts, including the temporary or permanent transfer or sales of accounts, username or X (e.g. “pay for affiliation” schemes) products. ~https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/authenticity (Engagement Spam -> Learn more) Would definitely advise caution around this account. /// EDIT Ethereum Maxis blocked me after my tweet & this review. That account is very likely to still be under the control of Alucard.

on Ethereum Maxis · 309· 5mo ago · negative320

“grift casino / DM spam”This page + affiliated burner accounts keep spamming my DMs. I think I got like 10 different DMs trying to get me to deposit my money there lol "We’d like to offer you an ambassador position with a weekly balance boost starting from $2,000 (withdrawal available after a x1 rollover)." Grift!

on RollDrift | Play now! · 1097· 6mo ago · negative261

“useless review spam”This user is spamming slop reviews that mainly consist out of 1-2 word titles. That's it. Useless spam. [The person that invited this profile is also a slop poster, albeit of a different kind.](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/715551) Stop the slop and useless reviews...

on SF Sabuj 🚢 · 1157· 49d ago · negative83

“dogshit exchange”TLDR? Dogshit exchange harvesting your data. They have a relatively strong presence on twitter but that's about it. Recently they had some spaces where they were raffling a milady. After that I checked their exchange out. Same layout as Binance/Bybit/Kucoin/etc just inherently worse in pretty much every aspect besides social presence. Tried reaching out to their support to check how that looks like, which is imho one of the most overlooked exchange aspects. Per email you get unrelated macro replies from some Chinese person not even reading your inquiry. Per chat you get connected to some random person in the 3rd world. "Hello my dear. Dear sar please kindly wait while I read your message." Tried it 3 times at various times. 3x connected to some random Indian person who failed to understand a simple request and was hitting me with "my dear" every single message. If they stopped paying over 30 grand to have 37+ affiliates on twitter then maybe they could afford non-3rd world support. Now let's get to the data harvesting part. Their KYC goes through Sumsub and it is pretty standard to use 3rd party processors. But it already is concerning when you remember that Sumsub had unauthorized and undetected access to users PII for 1.5+ years. Lots of non-dogshit exchanges opted out of using sumsub after that but apparently Ourbit didn't - because they don't give a shit about user data safety. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020916026553081927 https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2020864976693424431 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020933327688216890 But that's not something inherently unique. Everyone uses external data processors. Some use the dogshit ones that can't detect unauthorized access to user PII for years, like sumsub. But that's not the worst part. The worst thing happens when you try to delete your account. Their process is the worst dogshit data harvesting attempt I've seen. a) It takes "over 22+ days" for them to process your deletion request. b) To request account and data deletion... you have to provide them more of your PII data? Selfies with ID that go directly to Ourbit 3rd world support (not sumsub). Yikes. c) According to multiple users those always get declined multiple times and they will request more selfies of you holding your ID to delete your account. Getting as big of a dataset as they can lol FYI: Demanding additional biometric or identity data as a precondition for processing an erasure request is incompatible with the principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation. Doing my back and forth with Ourbit there's been multiple things that go against standard industry practices, common sense, and various guidelines - like GDPR for example. When you have someone who: 1) made the account within the last 24-72h 2) has 0 transactions on the platform 3) has their account verified and protected via 2FA / mobile verif / email verif / passkeys Then the "we're just making sure you're the user so we don't accidentally delete your data" argument that's being used to harvest PII is not going to make any sense in that case. Sadly the minimum wage Ourbit employees in the 3rd world don't understand that, their task is just to get users to hand over PII 💀 Their data protection officer, or whoever handles the requests on that email, is absolutely clueless. They straight up do not care about being in breach of multiple GDPR aspects and will hit you with "well then have your lawyer reach out if you have a problem with that". 💀💀💀 I haven't traded on there, but I've read plenty of user reports across twitter, reddit and trustpilot. (Their trustpilot rating 66% 1 star 💀) Another MEXC-esqe "funds have been crawback" type of exchange. Do NOT make an account on Ourbit and do NOT give them your data.

on Ourbit · 1234· 2mo ago · negative78

“Thank you for the essay, ChatGPT!”The AI (ChatGPT specifically) patterns on every single review are even a bigger tell than the pasted review titles (and the reviews being cut off mid sentence due to the character limit)😅 AI outputs that aren't in English also tend to follow the same patterns as English ones, so it's easy to see whenever someone pastes 100% AI outputs with no editing - even if they do so in their native language instead of English. This is the case here. Sometimes it's even easy to notice what AI model the person is using, because different AIs have different output patterns they frequently adhere to. If you played around with different AI models for a while you will be able to instantly notice some of those output patterns. If you take a look at the 88 reviews this account has left you might notice that the majority follows the same AI slop patterns: 1) A lot of the early reviews left by this account are full of the infamous — em dashes. The account stopped using them in reviews about ~2 months ago when it became active after a break. But the previous ones are full of — dashes. Strike one. 2) The review title is often cut off mid sentence. It's copy pasted from the AI output, and it gets cut off due to the character limit in titles. Strike two. 3) The lengthy reviews will have paragraphs starting with ChatGPT specific output patterns: "Notably," "Furthermore," "Above all," "Overall," "In summary," "Consequently," "Specifically," "In addition," "Moreover," "In particular," Most people have used ChatGPT at some point, so it should be ultra obvious that those are unedited ChatGPT outputs that are being pasted by this account. Strike three. Thank you for the slop reviews ChatGPT.

on songsong | 𝔽rAI(❖,❖) · 1504· 4mo ago · negative76

“Oekaki friend :)”I've known sote for like 2 years now, we first met in the Oekaki Connect community. Very kind person that has my full trust :)

on Soteleon · 1330· 2mo ago56

‹ Back36 of 241 · most upvoted firstMore ›