Profile· Known@miyaspokeofthisOn Ethos

Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)
28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accountsThe record
From 25 activities · Apr 2026A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.
What people say
Received · 28Given · 241“When it comes to Jesse, I wish I could vote negative twice...”Voting negative and supporting the recent slash. Some of my reasons can be found below. Includes slandering people on twitter spaces, malicious takedown of a discord server over false accusations, botting out negative sentiment (potential breaking of FTC rules) - all in a singular development. https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1835858307723960528 https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1836113643341254986 https://www.oekakiconnect.net/blog/we-will-win/ Jesse: https://x.com/jessepollak/status/1834967219287064764 The context, without the malicious cropping: https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1835858327546347618 https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1835858321586168042 Threads from when the situation was actively developing. https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1834966342203490719 https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1835389581077745841 He / base employees maliciously reported and nuked a server full of 3000+ artists, only for Jesse to post 10 minutes later that "base is for everyone". Lol,I don't think so. During the same time he actively tried to onboard wakaflocka to base, in the middle of waka promoting yet another rug coin. Based on waka's posts around the time, it seems like there was a paid (undisclosed) promo between base and flocka - but I cannot fully confirm this, so paint your own picture based on the above threads. Besides that, promotion of 'based' copycats - a full project copycat, but recolored in blue & launched on base. Jesse has a history of promoting the stolen, blue tinted "based" content. https://x.com/jessepollak/status/1868105608811200904 Until he get's called out: https://x.com/0xShadowban/status/1868120095563936207 https://x.com/jessepollak/status/1868176557413695789 And then there is the reason for the recent slash, which are the zora coins. Repeated bad faith behavior = slash/negative sentiment is more than justified.
on jesse.base.eth · 2087· 1y ago · negative37
on jesse.base.eth · 2087· 1y ago · negative37“lack of due diligence, enabling grifters”In their recent tweets, they failed to do basic due diligence and tagged an obvious scam account saying it's jaredfromsubway. The fake jared shared their tweets to give himself more credibility - right before launching pumpfun shitcoins. https://i.imgur.com/lGDao3X.png Shame! https://x.com/blockaid_/status/2069486185592869166 https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/709514/on-june-20-jaredsmev-ethereums-most-active-mev-bots-was-drained-of-7-5-m-in-a~ https://x.com/blockaid_/status/2068433798757577198 https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/709517/%F0%9F%9A%A8-community-alert-blockaid-exploit-detection-system-detected-an-exploit~
on Blockaid · 1339· 4mo ago · negative64
on Blockaid · 1339· 4mo ago · negative64“from title only reviews to full on essay length slop”This account previously used to paste their (slop) reviews into the 120 character limit titles... then it found out there is actual space where the reviews go into, so now we're able to read the full length slop this account is copy pasting 😹 The OpenSea review from a week ago caught my eye. Not sure what AI this account is using, but it's outputting very outdated information. 1) OS hasn't had auctions in quite a long time. That functionality was removed when OS2 launched OVER A YEAR AGO. 2) The mention of 8 supported chains is also outdated, last I checked (today) you can filter 25 chains on user profiles. The list of supported chains this account mentioned is from pre-OS2 times as well. It's outdated by over a year at this point. Stop copy pasting outdated slop reviews... nobody benefits from those.
on kazmythrizz .ink ₿₿₿ · 1197· 4mo ago · negative35
on kazmythrizz .ink ₿₿₿ · 1197· 4mo ago · negative35“spam tagging”Spam tagging people under some "grab some free testnet Bitcoin" bullshit. https://x.com/TheApeBitcoiner/status/2051346764184031742
on The ₿itcoin Ape 🐵₿ · 1194· 6mo ago · negative200
on The ₿itcoin Ape 🐵₿ · 1194· 6mo ago · negative200“slop count: 100%”This account has left 16 reviews and every single one of them is worthless slop: https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/mehmetgocek2?activities=given They were also invited by a different notorious slop poster: https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/djkemalozgur?activities=given Stop the slop brah.
on Mehmet G.⭕️❤️ 💙 Tabi 🟧 | ETHGas ⛽ · 1128· 2mo ago · negative33
on Mehmet G.⭕️❤️ 💙 Tabi 🟧 | ETHGas ⛽ · 1128· 2mo ago · negative33“fake PnL screenshots with impossible leverage; engagement bait to promote their TG group”This account is engagement baiting just to promote their TG group. In their recent post about their hype position, they posted a fake PnL screenshot showing a leverage that isn't even possible on the platform. The screenshot shows a 25x leverage when only 10x is possible. https://imgur.com/a/IbmGBr7 This account is using various engagement bait tactics: Made up stories about getting liquidated and "running it up again" combined with fake PnL screenshots - all just to funnel people to their TG group. Haven't lurked around the TG, but I assume it's where the extraction and using people as exit liquidity happens.
on jiwoo.eth · 1006· 4mo ago · negative33
on jiwoo.eth · 1006· 4mo ago · negative33“review slop factory”I've been seeing this account in the review feed quite often. It has been constantly pumping out reviews so I've decided to take a closer look. A pattern emerges: Pretty short and overly positive reviews and a very similar structure on every review. Often featuring the — em dashes as well 😹 When comparing the reviews side by side it's easy to notice: it's all slop. Majority of the reviews are positive, so I guess the angle here was getting positive reviews in return to quickly farm reputation. Multiple people also tagged their reviews as spam: Quadwitch: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/707782/incredible-power-user-and-a-true-cornerstone-of-the-community Batu: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/707327/focused-on-trust-and-transactions Ben: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/707783/the-unsung-technical-hero-of-ethos
on Escrow Build · 1347· 4mo ago · negative230
on Escrow Build · 1347· 4mo ago · negative230“coordinated invites for reviewbombing purposes”Related to this review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/715681/coordinated-review-bombing Rifu invited 10 (out of the 35) profiles whose activity is highly coordinated. All of those profiles accepted invites today. The total of 35 profiles that were invited by multiple people (including this profile) share mirrored activity. First activity was a review of [Nazim](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/shahrianazim6). Some of them cross reviewed each other, some requested human verification. Highly coordinated review bombing targeting the Nazim profile. The purpose of the reviewbombing and cross-reviewing? Inflating reputation and faking 1800 score to get the no-KYC / no collateral Credifi money: https://imgur.com/a/0FhRQI6 https://imgur.com/a/fOmhfIn If you check his last reviews, Rifu has overlap with at least 6 other reviewbombers.
on Rifu · 1284· 50d ago · negative32
on Rifu · 1284· 50d ago · negative32“the "crawback" exchange with a twitter botnet and a very shady past”The exchange behind the legendary support reply: >User: "When will it be unfrozen and back in my account?" >MEXC: Nope, due to abnormal profit from your futures trading. Hence, it has been crawback. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1738918197481332790 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1991871567329128475 MEXC is imho a very shady exchange listing every dogshit token (and their copycats) and often doing a "crawback" on user funds whenever they are too profitable. https://x.com/WhiteWhaleLabs/status/1983572679715086524 This part is especially interesting: >She (Cecilia Hsueh / @cecilia_hsueh) indicated MEXC was “open” to releasing the funds - if I helped them control the narrative. https://x.com/WhiteWhaleLabs/status/1984301224230076498 https://x.com/WhiteWhaleLabs/status/1987205170069975256 The funds were magically released after Zachxbt started looking into "Tony" aka the shadow CEO of MEXC. When a company has a shadow CEO running things from behind the scenes... It's probably best to avoid lol https://x.com/JamesRucker21/status/1984230238218514701 https://x.com/cecilia_hsueh/status/1984869263883088262 Their PR damage control fund unfreezing didn't last long before they started to freeze user funds and engage in shady tactics again 😅 They are also running a LOT of bots that will flood your tweets whenever you tweet something negative about MEXC. Example: https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1996996578997936530 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1997264628695646420 https://x.com/st88887/status/1997540201472864375 Zach also called MEXC out multiple times in the past. https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2015073648021840066 https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2015083426479534418 Best to avoid.
on MEXC · 957· 4mo ago · negative32
on MEXC · 957· 4mo ago · negative32“Ethos sensei”Founder of Ethos, the herald of reputation. Dedicated builder and the reason why we're all here :) Serpin made navigating CT a lot easier, especially for newbies in the space. The chrome extension is pretty useful as you can quickly glance at someone's reputation via the twitter overlay. There are many jokes about the "web3 attention span" and forgetting how often someone scammed others in the past - ethos is a great remedy for the web3 attention as you can quickly get a good picture through someone's past reviews and you instantly know whether you should avoid them or not. A good starter pack for newbies in crypto: Ethos + PocketUniverse. Those two extensions are basically a staple for newcomers to avoid getting scammed.
on Serpin Taxt · 2000· 8mo ago40
on Serpin Taxt · 2000· 8mo ago40“sketchy”Stumbled on this profile while researching another profile sending out DMs that lead up to a scam. The review can be found here: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/697080/scam-likely-tied-to-an-axiom-affiliate To sum it up: Jeff Wilson aka @Wilsonjai1 is a scam profile, and it uses an Axiom reflink @Tozpax. Tozpax is the previous handle of @Cryptoze who is an Axiom affiliate. He did fake engagement bait giveaways in the past and then changed his username (Tozpax -> Cryptoze). I would give him the benefit of the doubt due to the possibility that "Jeff Wilson" might have impersonated him in the past. But it makes 0 sense to have his Axiom reflink on that account, and given the accounts sketchy past I tend towards "grifters be grifting (in many ways)" Examples of some of the undeleted @Cryptoze tweets mentioning to follow his profile @Tozpax are below. As you can see, ALL of the tweets are fake engagement bait giveaways: https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956724038853652816 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956316372465565789 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956097190662648273 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1955588987512627495 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1955244467314675944 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1954947216323592279 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1954180113446076494 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1952063069565149522 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1950327666604912700 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1949836626659565930 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1948366756512145810 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1946675121135010251 While scammers often pretend to be others, it makes little sense for someone not even impersonating @Cryptoze to use his Axiom reflink in the bio 💀 While I can't be 100% certain that Cryptoze is behind the @Wilsonjai1 scam outreach, I feel like it's important to note the username connection. The fake giveaways urging people to follow him, deleting tweets and changing username once he got enough followers - are the main reason for the negative review. At the very least it's a sketchy Axiom affiliate account, and it's possibly leaning into scams.
on Toz · 1155· 7mo ago · negative31
on Toz · 1155· 7mo ago · negative31“larping grifter”Found this account while following the trail of other larping grifters: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/708945/ https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/708946/ The usual grifting pattern: botted followers, fake tweets with extraordinary (fake) claims, linking to their TG group under single every tweet. Then they use multiple side wallets to rinse the people that were stupid enough to join the TG and listen to their calls. Delete tweets, repeat, change username after a while, repeat again. This account was mainly being mentioned and cross promoted by "illusionsW3". It also frequently reposts other people from the "LARP cabal" mentioned by dethective: https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/447/ https://i.imgur.com/VZsdSjp.png Avoid this grifting larper and all his accounts.
on Danny · 1135· 4mo ago · negative38
on Danny · 1135· 4mo ago · negative38
Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Sk0rp.eth
Ethos
Brandon scott
vitalik.eth
Dpuck (bob)
Bálint Popovits
Mark Karpelès
CryptoPasokos
Riyo