Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)

28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 25 activities · Apr 2026

A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.

What people say

Received · 28 Given · 241

“your periodic reminder to revoke”Over time your hot wallets end up with a lot of permissions that might be able to get exploited in the future. It's important to periodically revoke permissions - on your social accounts like discord and twitter, as well as on your wallets. If you don't periodically manage the permissions on your socials and wallets you're taking on unnecessary (and preventable) risk of getting rekt. While your social accounts have settings like "3rd party permissions" that let you revoke access, in crypto you need tools like revoke.cash Revoke is imho. one of the tools you NEED to know about, but it's also important to know about alternative tools. If you remember the Ledger Connect Kit exploit then you might recall revoke.cash being affected as well. https://x.com/martypartymusic/status/1735333908617765110 https://x.com/officer_secret/status/1735276914321846498 (That was a Ledger whoopsie due to not revoking previous employee access -> that ex-employee getting phished -> pushing malicious code to prod. Many protocols were affected due to the connect kit dependency, that's why this is still a positive review for Revoke. All blame for the connect kit exploit is on Ledger and them not following basic corporate security 101 - like not revoking former employee access and allowing a single account push code to prod. Also, Ledger lied about it in their PR damage control statement: https://x.com/rot13maxi/status/1735379071171760274) But this is not a Ledger review, so let's not get too offtopic :) Revoke is a great tool to know about, but you also need to be aware of alternatives - because crypto is crypto and sometimes frontends get compromised. A good alternative to revoke is the etherscan token approval checker: https://etherscan.io/tokenapprovalchecker I use both tools regularly. And so should you. If you've read this far, then it might be a good time to check your approvals (on your wallets AND on your socials) - stay safe :)

on Revoke.cash · 1696· 4mo ago25

“part of a scam ring”part of a group luring people into private / seed deals and then running off with the money.

on Mikey Cernak | Solana Breakpoint 🇦🇪 · 501· 1y ago · negative25

“slop reviews, harassment on twitter”cpd got called out for slop reviews -> left a retaliatory review and then started harassing me on Twitter. My review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/710164/ One of his tweets saved via Ethos Agent: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/710455/ lol, lmao even

on cpd · 1339· 4mo ago · negative119

“jun <3”We interacted pretty often across multiple groupchats and we crossed paths a billion times due to a lot of shared mutuals, servers and communities (MiVI, abstract, moemoe, hoshino, etc). We share very similar views on things like privacy, freedom, tech and philosophy. We also have similar taste in aesthetics :) Jun is genuine person and a total sweetheart :)

on jun.rise · 1399· 6mo ago24

“grifter targeting the milady ecosystem to max extract liquidity using the milady name”Holy shit, what a shitshow. Evidently a grifter targeting milady. I noticed Shaw is specifically targeting milady while declining affiliation (because there is none, it's just a grift). Somehow there is a BSC milady shitcoin, on a February 2026 account, getting buybacks from Shaw. Another grift, most likely launched and endorsed by Shaw himself. For starters, the only milady coin is CULT. Anything else is a grift trying to profit from the milady name. Grifters never stop inventing new ways to exploit communities, Shaw is a prime example of that. Grifting on grifting on grifting on grifting and aiming for max extraction out of the ecosystem. Only the original CULT token holds any real value in the milady ecosystem, any milady would know that. This Shaw character is just another layer in the endless scam pyramid trying to grift off the milady name. Relevant: https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2025896612761829455 "Oh? @elizaOSis on GITHUB Trending - #1 Repo of the day" - promoting Shaws project. https://x.com/milady_bsc/status/2024857596122091976 "Buy back from @shawmakesmagic 👏 I guess it's the first token Shaw has ever bought on the BNB Chain." https://x.com/milady_bsc/status/2024708549969137992 "More buybacks from @shawmakesmagic." https://x.com/milady_bsc/status/2025138286222864495 Bubblemaps cluster: https://v2.bubblemaps.io/map?address=0xc20e45e49e0e79f0fc81e71f05fd2772d6587777&chain=bsc Highly likely just another layer to do targeted grifting and liquidity extraction out of the milady ecosystem. Avoid at all costs! Luvv explained it quite well: >no gtd mints for remilia asset holders >same "reward" for owning a milady as for holding the "milady bsc memecoin" (lolwut) >"it's free so no one can call it a scam" "but no whitelist lmao" >"we won't launch the mint through any reputable platform but instead through our new app (?????) this way we can make sure that we're the only ones able to bot most of the supply at launch lol" "his plan is to grift you with a 1 minute botted mintout to fake interest then make u fomo into buying this dogshit on secondary dont fall for it" https://x.com/luvvpilled/status/2025719454332498109

on Shaw · 1039· 8mo ago · negative24

“one of the most vile human beings i've ever had the displeasure of crossing paths with”After Base people maliciously reported and took down the Oekaki discord server on 9/14, "rb3k" was making fun of the deceased artist that was part of the server. He was celebrating the memorial channel being deleted and defending Base people maliciously reporting the server which led to it being temporarily nuked. At some point he "backed down" from his main account, but then he spun up multiple fresh profiles from which he was tagging people and mocking the deceased artist. Rb is a spiritually broke, absolutely worthless scumbag. Never seen a bigger piece of shit than this guy. One of the most vile human beings I've ever had the displeasure of crossing paths with. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2023235760166511010

on rb3k · 1309· 8mo ago · negative24

“one of my favorite tools”Gaszip is a quick and easy crosschain bridge with low minimum bridge amounts. The name already hints at it; it's a nice tool to quickly and cheaply reload on native gas tokens across different chains. You can also send bigger amounts, but I think where GasZip really shines are those couple bucks crosschain gas refuels. For example selecting $5 on Ethereum and refueling gas on multiple chains of your choice. They also have 15 faucets: Arbitrum Sepolia, Avalanche Testnet, Base Sepolia, BSC Testnet, HyperEVM Testnet, KiteAI Testnet, MegaETH Testnet, OPN Testnet, Optimism Sepolia, Pharos Atlantic, Polygon Amoi, RISE Testnet, Robinhood Testnet, Sei Testnet, Sepolia Testnet Really good tool with a really good and intuitive UI. I looked at my stats and so far I've used gas.zip 562 times to crosschain refuel. So yeah, it definitely has my stamp of approval :)

on Gas.zip · 1494· 4mo ago22

“optimizoor!”One of my long time mutuals and milady friends. solady dev (gas optimized solidity snippets) & EF silviculture society member. ethereum aligned cypherpunk. >Moral of the story: it's important to be aligned (cypherpunk) in both speech and action. ~vectorized.eth

on vectorized.eth · 1635· 4mo ago21

“trustworthy OG”Cobie has been around since pretty much forever, he's an OG and one of the most reputable and trustworthy people in crypto. He is the man behind the up only podcast and echo investing platform. Also the go-to person when people need escrow while doing bets on crypto twitter lol If you're in crypto and active on CT, then you should definitely know who Cobie is. If you don't then you definitely need to lurk more. After the echo acquisition by coinbase, Cobie also did a better job doing support for coinbase than the people who are actually working in coinbase support 😹 I've seen him solving issues for dozens of people who were locked out and restricted on coinbase and not getting anywhere with the clueless support until Cobie came in and saved the day. When you open up a dictionary to look up the definition of MVP you're gonna find a picture of Cobie. As Stan Marsh from South Park would say: Cobie has 'tegridy 😹 Way more 'tegridy than most people in this space.

on Cobie · 2545· 4mo ago21

“neutral”I don't always agree with Nikita re: product updates (especially the local-content one, as it would basically kill creators targeting global audience and having minimal local engagement), but I feel like the negative reviews re: bans might be slightly biased and unjustified. I'm a crypto account and I'm active on crypto twitter. I called out Nikita a few times in the past - none of them were necessarily very civil. But when I had issues Nikita still reached out and helped solving them. And I'm not banned (yet 😹). But that's because I don't have the social media presence of a bot. Any time I've seen crypto accounts call out Nikita it usually were people who spend their days mass replying "GM" or spamming "plz follow back" without ever tweeting anything meaningful. Oftentimes they also mass engage in reposting and commenting under fake crypto giveaways. You might have seen Nikita dunking on accounts like that more than once. You might be human, but if you have the online presence of a bot - then you might get nuked. And imho that's deserved because you're not contributing anything and just making the platform worse for everyone. There have been CT bans that weren't justified and felt very targeted - nub comes to mind. But this isn't necessarily Nikita's fault; he is the head of product and not someone who handles account restrictions. The recent ban waves targeted bots and accounts with bot-like activity. If you got hit by the recent ban wave then you most likely were one of the accounts that got flagged due to bot-like activity. Paying for premium and being human verified on ethos doesn't change the fact that you have a social media presence of a bot. And it doesn't give you immunity - there's plenty of bots and scammers with a checkmark. They aren't immune to account restrictions either. This is my first neutral review. I chose to leave a neutral review precisely because I don't always agree with Nikita, but I also don't necessarily agree with accounts negatively reviewing him because they got nuked due to having the social media presence of a bot.

on Nikita Bier · 1543· 6mo ago · neutral21

“scam VC profile”Scam profile trying to phish people. They will try to lure you into meetings, it's the type of ancient crypto scam where they try to phish you via fake meeting links. Part of the message sent from @mhanks_icp: "Reaching out to you from the team at Consensus VC Fund @consensusvcfund (...) To get in touch and learn more, please message our Venture Partner and investor on Telegram: @alisheikh_vc, and he will explain everything." Sending the both @ here as it might be beneficial to avoid their future scams. Both accounts are obviously controlled by the scammers. The VC page shows signs of being a quickly launched site made to funnel you towards their discord - for example if you try to check out the email they use. I assume the TG user will funnel you to fake meeting URLs and the discord will have a fake verification tool - either way you'll get phished.

on Consensus Capital · 1110· 8mo ago · negative21

“Ethereum, the world computer”If I could pick only one chain to use for the next 1000 years it would be Ethereum. Forget L2s and alt-L1s - it's time you return to mainnet.

on Ethereum · 1880· 8mo ago21

‹ Back84 of 241 · most upvoted firstMore ›