Monad

1,947 reviews, 67% of them positive.67% positive · 1,947 reviews· Influence factor 293, above 59% of accounts

The record

From 843 activities · Apr 2026

Monad is a high-performance EVM-compatible Layer 1 with impressive technical architecture—parallel execution, 10,000 TPS target, and low latency—that has attracted a passionate community and strong funding. However, the project is deeply polarized: supporters praise the tech, speed, and community bonds formed during testnet, while a substantial portion of the community feels betrayed by the airdrop distribution, which heavily favored influencers and external crypto participants over testnet users who spent months testing and providing feedback. The core tension centers on broken trust—many early supporters view the tokenomics as extractive and the community rewards as unfair, with testnet participants receiving minimal allocation despite their contributions, while others remain bullish on the technical foundation and long-term potential.

What people say

Received · 1.9K Given · 0

“Poor management.”Unfortunately, this project ignored the hard work. Those working on the project were ignored. The point here isn't whether they receive an award, but rather that the awards were given to individuals or projects that had nothing to do with the project. This was completely unfair. I'm refusing to support this project.

KaanTR .ink 🟣🟢 🌶️ · 1345· 12mo ago · negative9

“Good or Bad?”A pesar de no haber calificado al airdrop siendo constante y utilizando los protocolos mi opinión no será negativa, simplemente me parece que les hizo falta tomar más en cuenta a los usuarios de red que a los poseedores de roles y demás cosas que no reflejaban el testear la misma.

LaCriptizaX | base.eth✨🐐🛡️💚🌙 · 1220· 12mo ago · neutral9

“proof that words mean nothing”monad preached about community and decentralization but when it came to distribution it turned into another insiders game early testers and active members ignored it feels less like innovation more like manipulation

arash.2025 | · 1288· 12mo ago · negative9

“Famouse community, but...”Monad has gathered a very good community around itself, many of its members are very creative personalities, always happy to help in difficult situations. I know some of the artists personally, but will they be rewarded? And will the testnet participants be rewarded? I don't know the answer to this question, but it would be great if we were all rewarded.

stiv · 1251· 12mo ago · neutral9

“Monad”I worked a lot on the monad I have used all their swap bridges etc I also traded their NFTs But they didn't give me anything I didn't get any benefit from working on Monad That's why I don't like it. He wasted my time

saimra · 1215· 1y ago · neutral9

“Scam project which forgot its community”Why you did not care about your loyal community and testnet users but almost the all of your Airdrop will be prize to other community like Hyper traders, shit project

marti · 1291· 1y ago · negative9

“Absolutely beautiful project Besides tech, which is completely great, I would say I really love the team moves.”

carrots.nad (🎟️ arc) · 1150· 1y ago9

“Scam = Deadchain = Monad”Some will defend that they don't say testnet have incentive, but why act like there are to farm users? The amazing stat of testnet to make project become popular and investor feel good all thanks to testnet users But they scam community by saying "only 5k5 members fit Monad community" Maybe these people exclude of devs/members of projects in this scam ecosystem Let's see how your chain alive with 5k5 users

Di Di · 1255· 1y ago · negative9

“not saying monad is a failure but messing with community and playing with the mindset of testners is f up,”

EARLISON.SUI · 1300· 1y ago · negative9

“Monad Chain Airdrop: All Hype, Little Reward”Eligibility Rules That Seem Mismatched with Expectations: Many Hyperliquid traders, HypurrNFT holders, and frequent testnet participants believed they would qualify, sometimes due to earlier indications. But when the criteria were published, many with high volumes or prolonged participation were excluded. For example: people who traded over $200 million on perps at Hyperliquid reportedly didn’t make the cut. Tiny Representation of Core Community: Only about 5,500 wallets of Monad’s own community met the eligibility criteria just ~0.74% of the project’s Discord membership. That’s a shockingly small share. In contrast, a much larger number of the airdrops was allocated to users outside the core community some of whom may barely know anything about the project. Poor Transparency / Vague Criteria; The screening rules weren’t communicated very clearly in advance. Which kinds of interactions counted? What was the exact formula? Many feel that “moving goalposts” or fine print meant that “active contribution” didn’t guarantee eligibility. Effort Not Rewarded: There are multiple reports from testnet users who put in long hours, many transactions, lots of interactions yet ended up ineligible. For these people, it feels like their effort was wasted. Scam Risk & Confusion: Ahead of the airdrop, fake Telegram ads and malicious links mimicking the claim portal were circulating. Scammers exploited the anticipation, leading to confusion and risk. Monad’s team did issue warnings, but for many users, the need for such warnings underscores poor communication/preparation.

afaringan.eth · 1284· 1y ago · negative9

“#Decentralized” project centralized in privilege”You can’t build trust while quietly rewarding few insiders. Entire point of community airdrop is to reward effort, loyalty and belief, not to pad the bags of the privileged. This kind of stunt tells everyone what Monad really values: connections over contribution, capital over community. Hardworking contributors who gave their time, energy and creativity actually thought they were building something fair all has been kicked asside.

yminati · 1205· 1y ago · negative9

“From innovation to disappointment”monad had everything it needed to become a cornerstone of the next blockchain era speed, tech, vision. but the team proved they don’t understand community or fairness. rewarding farmers and ignoring real contributors killed the trust. it’s hard to support a project that values hype over the people who actually built with it.

AZIZ base.eth · 1286· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back996 of 1,947 · most upvoted firstMore ›