MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352aadvark↓2630xSammy↓253Tradevitalik.eth↑43.1%Anton Boiarchuk↑9.6%Biti8↑3.2%Cuzzo 🛡️↓4.2%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsJeetupositive · 82 upvotesjeff.hlpositive · 47 upvotesDegen Ape Traderpositive · 42 upvotesaikendrum.ethpositive · 31 upvotes
Profile· Known@neko_smgOn Ethos
sasami😈

sasami😈

18 reviews, 100% of them positive; 937 WHUF vouched for them by 3 people.100% positive · 18 reviews· 937 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 4, above 1% of accounts

The record

From 19 activities · Jul 2026

A Japanese crypto researcher and influencer known for daily, thoroughly researched information sharing across X, Discord, and personal blogs—covering projects like Base, MegaETH, Arc, and Solana Mobile with speed and accuracy. Distinguishes herself by sharing projects without referral incentives and personally verifying all information before posting. Praised for clear, accessible writing that serves both beginners and experienced users, generous community engagement via DMs, and consistent support within Japanese Web3 communities.

“A Pattern of Rule Changes and Broken Expectations”In my experience, Tria has repeatedly changed rules after the fact, which severely damaged trust within the community. The project attracted users by heavily promoting an airdrop. However, what was initially communicated did not match the final outcome. It was suggested that simply issuing the card would qualify users for the airdrop, but later it turned out that only those who actively used the card were eligible. Around TGE, new announcements were made that effectively overturned earlier expectations. Long vesting periods were suddenly applied to the airdrop allocation, making it impossible for most users to claim their tokens in any meaningful timeframe. It appears that those who benefited the most were people who generated large numbers of referrals, while regular users who participated in good faith were left disappointed. The token sale was conducted at a high FDV, and vesting conditions were reportedly modified on short notice. Communication about these changes was sent only via email, without clear official public announcements. The refund window was limited to just three days, which felt extremely restrictive. The concept of crypto cards itself is promising. If executed properly, it could become a powerful bridge between traditional payments and crypto adoption. Unfortunately, the handling of expectations and communication by Tria has significantly harmed the credibility of this category. Trust is everything in crypto. Once lost, it is very difficult to regain.on Tria · 559· 8mo ago · negative10
‹ Back28 of 28 · most upvoted first