Nikita Bier

31 reviews, 13% of them positive.13% positive · 31 reviews· Influence factor 319, above 62% of accounts

The record

From 31 activities · Apr 2026

Head of Product at X known for aggressive mass-banning of crypto accounts and perceived bot enforcement, often without clear evidence or meaningful appeal processes. Criticized for antagonistic communication style, micromanagement, and dismissive treatment of user feedback, though some acknowledge efforts to combat spam and engagement farming. Polarizing figure whose product decisions—including restrictions on crypto content and algorithmic changes—have alienated creators and real users while generating significant backlash over account suspensions and lack of transparency.

What people say

Received · 31 Given · 0

“Sistem yang tidak akurat”Saya sudah melakukan verifikasi berkali kali dan aktif berinteraksi secara organik,tapi tetap saja dianggap tidak valid.akun x yang benar benar manusia juga menjadi sasaran bagi nikita bier,akun x itu sangat dibutuhkan karena banyak pekerjaan web3 yang terhubung ke akun x tersebut dan saya harus menunda semua pekerjaan itu karena nikita bier.bagaimana bisa seorang manusia asli yang hanya ingin bekerja diekosistem ini malah diblokir aksesnya oleh penilaian yang keliru?

jair2_ · 1395· 6mo ago · negative2

“Ban Hammer Addict”Every problem seems to have one solution: ban it. Question it? Ban. Crypto account? Ban. Breathing too fast? Probably ban. When your only tool is a hammer, everyone starts looking like a violation. Funny style, bad system.

Hero_Phatan 🪑 · 1401· 6mo ago · negative2

“An incompetent person and employee”How can people like this be allowed to lead and implement ideas in any project? I don’t get it. Over the past few days, tens, if not hundreds of thousands, of X user accounts have been blocked, which he brags about on social media—we’re blocking 208 bots per minute, and that number is only growing. If they’re bots, then screw him, but in reality, he’s blocking real users. I’ve had my account for over 10 years, I only posted about verified projects, no questionable tweets or comments. In the end, despite my arguments, they blocked my account! What’s the point of their appeal form if, in reality, they don’t even read users’ explanations—which actually provide proof of the user’s authenticity—and just vent their disagreement and reasons? With this clown’s arrival, so many problems have started on the social network that aren’t doing it any favors. It’s unclear why Elon keeps this moron around at all!

Irina G | π² | 💚| base.eth | 🍊,💊 · 1312· 6mo ago · negative1

“This person I hate the most, how can they mass-ban x””

🌶️mucha🌶️ · 1306· 6mo ago · negative1

“Fuck him”Fuck him and anybody that reviewed him positively.

Preacher | ∑: · 1445· 6mo ago · negative2

“FEEDBACk”Recently, many people have been using bots for interaction, and it's become very trendy. Ironically, the vast majority of interactive content still generates revenue. Now, nobody reads posts to interact anymore; they just view and leave, a far cry from before. I hope there will be captchas for comments or something to prevent bots.

NTV · 1202· 5mo ago · negative0

“Head of Product for Banning Real User”Saya berubah dari Netral menjadi Negatif karena menilai bahwa aturan X terkait pernyataan spam terlalu berlebihan. Banyak akun orang yang nyata menggunakan X sebagai social media dan kehidupan sehari-harinya malah masih terkena pembatasan distribusi konten, alhasil. Sangat sulit untuk menjangkau dan menerima hal baru setelah diterapkannya aturan ini. Disisi lain, aturan ini memiliki tujuan yang mulia, namun hanya bagi X sendiri. Karena di aturan terbaru, jangkauan tentang crypto memanglah dibatasi. Padahal, kebanyakan orang diluar sana, bahkan termasuk saya. Ingin menggunakan X dengan pengalaman yang lebih baik saat menggunakan fitur premium, namun pada kenyataannya, tampilan akun di batasi, tulisan dan informasi yang dibuat ditutup persebarannya ke jangkauan yang lebih luas, aturan interaksi yang terlalu rumit sehingga malah membuat setiap orang harus seolah punya gaya kritik layaknya sang penyair, dan lain sebagainya. Saya mengingat, sebuah perubahan dengan tujuan yang baik memanglah bukan perkara mudah, tapi tanpa kesadaran dari si pembuat aturan, maka tujuan tersebut akan jauh lebih sulit tercapai. Silahkan direnungkan! Dan kepada Ethos, tolong jangan hide review saya, karena saya tulis ini agar supaya orang bisa lihat, apa yang mungkin tidak terlihat.

nostalgiagila (❖,❖) · 1302· 6mo ago · negative0

“Wrongly banning real humans and acting like the platform police”Just looked through the reviews and it’s pretty clear why this profile is sitting at 15% positive. The guy is out here banning actual humans with no real evidence, then giving templated email responses when people try to appeal. One person even had to do a video call just to prove they weren’t a bot. On top of that the ego and micromanaging style is exactly what people are calling out rude, aggressive, and killing the vibe for creators who’ve been building for years. Doesn’t feel like someone who should be shaping reputation or moderation. The low score and all the thumbs down reviews tell the story. Not someone worth trusting here.

Itsakm8 · 1382· 6mo ago · negative0

“nor fav one”shit x team memeber

Blue Researcher · 1292· 6mo ago · negative0

“X Twitter killer”Musk made twitter great again few years ago idk is it this guy faut that X become down to facebook level platform but of course he put efforts on that the worst part is banning real people accounts calling them bot incl me was banned as well.

yminati · 1205· 6mo ago · negative0

“I know, the destroyer, the Suspender”Misuse of power. Nigga purposely killed crypto and drag all the attention to himself by aggressively suspending accounts of innocent users, tagging them bots or spam. Suspending accounts doesn't make him a hero but he remind everyone that it is not a good idea to give so much power to the premature child"

GARBY 🕯️☯︎☣︎𖤐✡𓂀✝☪︎ · 1279· 6mo ago · negative0

“Kebijakan Terbaru Terasa Berlebihan Sehingga Memblokir Orang Secara Acak Meskipun Kamu Bayar Premi/Centang Biru”Kebijakan pemblokiran akun crypto di X akhir-akhir ini terasa terlalu berlebihan. Memang spam dan scam perlu dibersihkan, tapi pendekatan massal yang dilakukan sekarang, justru merugikan banyak pengguna crypto yang legitimate. Banyak akun asli, builder, researcher, dan komunitas kecil tiba-tiba kena auto-lock, hanya karena pertama kali membahas crypto. Pernyataan bahwa “80% crypto is just bots” juga sangat menggeneralisir. Hal ini membuat banyak orang merasa dicurigai sejak awal, sehingga enggan lagi berbicara terbuka tentang crypto di X. Seharusnya X atau orang seperti Nikita bisa sistem yang lebih humanis, misal dengan memberikan warning atau peringatan yang ringan, sebelum kemudian mengambil tindakan yang lebih tegas. Dengan demikian hal ini bisa membuat sistem yang lebih tepat sasaran, bukan memblokir secara massal dan menyulitkan akun-akun yang beneran orang. Pendekatan seperti ini malah menghambat adopsi dan diskusi sehat di ekosistem crypto.

nostalgiagila (❖,❖) · 1302· 6mo ago · neutral0

‹ Back24 of 31 · most upvoted firstMore ›