Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Sk0rp.eth
Ethos
Brandon scott
vitalik.eth
Dpuck (bob)
Samorityanin🧢
Mark Karpelès
一川drive 🔴
aiobkhan ✨
RiyoProfile· Questionable@sehi1999On Ethos
Shiro
1 review, not positive.0% positive · 1 review· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accountsThe record
From 1 activities · Jul 2026Received criticism for a Pyth Network review deemed inauthentic and lacking personal experience, with concerns raised about the credibility of claims regarding ultra-fast, institution-backed infrastructure.
What people say
Received · 1Given · 37“''Yeet the new casino''”Crypto needs entertainment… and when trading slows down like right now, we all still want fun, fast-paced, gambling experiences—but ones that feel native to our world. Might be perfect for the current market, and a great timing. I like how they are trying to build a casino that's deeply aligned with the crypto culture and that you can get that feeling that you are right at home. It's a thing that a lot of casinos miss, you need to play us degens in the hands.
on YEET · 1583· 1y ago11
on YEET · 1583· 1y ago11“pure scam project”"The Leader Goes First? No One’s Allowed to Leave, the Project Team Goes First---Who’s Selling SPON Coins?" The Spheron project has genuinely disgusted me; it’s the kind of behavior that flip s the table outright. I can’t help but wonder: community that running nodes are 100 locked up and can’t claim airdrops, so who exactly got the coins? With the coin price so low 70 dump , who’s responsible for the selling pressure? So, I checked the on-chain data and combined it with the token model disclosed by the project team. I found that, aside from the project team, no one else—node runners, public sale participants, or even investors—could possibly be selling coins. Here’s the evidence: This is the project team’s token circulation chart: 1️⃣ 78% of the total token supply, including network rewards, is in this contract: https://basescan.org/token/0x080d43c2164afdbc3712422ce78ab902ccab5ca1?a=0x2cde9919e81b20b4b33dd562a48a84b54c48f00c 2️⃣ 8% for ecosystem incentives is in this contract: 0x8fE1F50d7f1759dDB9544ABB7b88DCb1fd3E26e3 3️⃣ Out of the 9% allocated for airdrops, 50,485,500 (5.048%) is likely the locked airdrop allocated to nodes, held in this contract: 0xD9e5D96d604ECdd3cd87fd84Ea8b34f2FC656e40 4️⃣ So, what about the remaining nearly 4%—was it distributed to the nodes? The rule is that those holding uSPON can directly unlock and convert to SPON, which accounts for about 3.76%. This portion was indeed sent to a distribution contract, but hardly anyone claimed it. In this contract, only a little over 80,000 SPON airdrops were claimed: 0xEE1c4d80AF9aB191f2EE9983DdBe8bA5E28505b0 So, the circulating coins can only come from here: Liquidity (5.00%) As we all know, the liquidity portion is essentially the project team selling coins. I’m not saying you can’t sell, but locking everyone else up—your investors, the people who bought in the public sale, or those who provided equipment and formed the foundation of your computing power—and leaving only you able to sell? what a shameless team
on Spheron Network · 898· 1y ago · negative8
on Spheron Network · 898· 1y ago · negative8“Absolute cinema”Imagine grinding a gated testnet for half a year and getting less than some Binance alpha user who never contributed and doesnt know what is succinet. people who got into the gated testnet and got way lower allocation than they should. Instead of fixing that, succinet team went ahead to lower people’s allocation the more. When Binance gets more than testers who actually used the product the incentives are clearly misaligned. This ain’t airdrop, this is public humiliation. Real ones got slapped. End of story.
on Succinct · 1749· 1y ago · negative10
on Succinct · 1749· 1y ago · negative10“Underrated OG Veteran Trader”Flood has that rare mix of sharp analysis and zero fluff. He’s been around since the early Bitcoin days, and it shows in the way he cuts through hype with grounded, data-driven takes. Between building tools like Insilico Terminal and dropping objective insights on how markets really work, he consistently adds value without noise.
on Flood · 1793· 1y ago9
on Flood · 1793· 1y ago9“best lending protocol”The world’s largest onchain lending protocol and borrowing protocol built on Ethereum and other EVM-compatible blockchains with $53B+ in net deposits across 14 networks. It enables users to supply crypto assets and earn interest, borrow assets using collateral, and engage in flash loans, among other services. Exciting times ahead! Aave's presence at SmartCon 2025 will be a game-changer for DeFi. Can't wait.
on Aave · 1888· 1y ago9
on Aave · 1888· 1y ago9“i do”ZachXBT is a well-known on-chain investigator in the crypto community who has exposed numerous scams, hacks, and fraudulent activities. While they have a strong reputation for accuracy and thorough research, it's always wise to verify claims independently before fully trusting any single source—especially in crypto, where misinformation can spread quickly. proven track record – Has uncovered multiple high-profile scams. Detailed evidence – Often provides blockchain data, transaction links, and clear explanations. Community respect – Many in crypto security and investigative circles acknowledge their work.
on ZachXBT · 2518· 1y ago9
on ZachXBT · 2518· 1y ago9“Lack of Utility $ZORA “Just for Fun” Token”the token was explicitly described as “for fun only,” with no governance rights, no staking, and no other functional use cases. Most Disappointing project who betrayed its own community many early supporters received token rewards which didn’t even cover gas fees i personally used their product and minted so many nft for 2 yrs only to end up getting betrayed in the end
on Zora · 658· 1y ago · negative8
on Zora · 658· 1y ago · negative8“Sharp & community-minded”Cristian in the Ethos community have been really impressed with his knowledge and feedback. The way he breaks down updates and changes shows he’s sharp, and on top of that, he’s got a great sense of humor. I haven’t personally engaged with him 1:1, but his reviews keep popping up on my feed and they always stand out. They’re detailed, well thought out, and clearly not rushed
on Cristian P. · 2108· 1y ago17
on Cristian P. · 2108· 1y ago17“scammer beware”this person @gigaverse is impersonating @playgigaverse . the real x account for gigaverse is @playgigaverse not @gigaverse so beware of scam.
on @gigaverse · 401· 1y ago · negative5
on @gigaverse · 401· 1y ago · negative5“Great tech but failed to meet community's expectation”after year of using stress testing and minting so many nft they failed to reward their earliest supporter i,e community and ended up giving 5,6 figures to yapper
on Caldera · 1666· 1y ago · negative4
on Caldera · 1666· 1y ago · negative4“best thing to do is to- unfollow, report and block”When the content’s stolen from others and the giveaways are just for farming clout. If you’re following this guy, be careful - the engagement tricks and copied content aren’t a good sign. thanks to beau for exposing him https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/213/scammer-engagement-farmer-fake-giveaways-and-stolen-content
on nobi 🇵🇹 · 697· 1y ago · negative3
on nobi 🇵🇹 · 697· 1y ago · negative3