Moverssellhalfandholdthreedaysonacoinwithgoodnarrative.eth↓409MegaETH↓330jeff.hl↓2500xd4b4...3C5f↓211Sk0rp.eth↑165Tradebuz↑25.2%Ansem 🐂🀄️↑1.0%Hyperliquid↑2.0%fomo↓12.6%VouchesSk0rp.eth9.0K WHUF → chosta.ethAndrewD200 WHUF → CragHack | GoHbobby_x77 WHUF → AdamHoangsang9120 WHUF → Hayden Adams 🦄Reviewsvitalik.ethpositive · 99 upvotesalonnegative · 87 upvotesCrypto Colaneutral · 72 upvotesWorldneutral · 71 upvotes
Profile· Exemplary@serpinxbtOn Ethos
Serpin Taxt

Serpin Taxt

2,005 reviews, 92% of them positive; 140.9K WHUF vouched for them by 109 people.92% positive · 2,005 reviews· 140.9K WHUF vouched· Influence factor 327, above 63% of accounts

The record

From 689 activities · Mar 2026

Known as the founder and CEO of Ethos Network, a reputation layer for Web3 focused on human verification, Sybil detection, and on-chain trust, with a background in product, security, and identity verification and a former managing partner at 0x5f Capital. Reviewers consistently describe a hands-on, community-engaged builder who hosts regular spaces, vibe coding streams, and Vibeathon events, and who answers feedback directly. Some note a strict, sometimes controversial stance on slashes and AI-generated content, but the overall picture is of a driven founder whose focus is credibility and transparency.

Vouched · 109 people · 140.9K WHUF at stakeAll vouches ›and 106 more
“Leave a negative review along with a very sarcastic remark on my account even before I joined Ethos.”In the past, I did commit the violation of shilling and posting the link to my article in the ETHOS Discord group, yes. At that time, I did not yet have the right to use the Ethos Network, I completely did not know and did not understand about how Ethos operates and its purpose. And when I received the invitation to join Ethos.Network, the first thing that hit my eyes was a negative comment with extremely sarcastic remarks from the Founder of Ethos.network himself: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/77840/spammed-the-ethos-discord-with-their-threads Although at the beginning I had some difficulties, I understood that the reason was because I was the one at fault for shilling the link in the group, yes. But if judging me negatively is only because of that spam action, then in my view that is very unfair. Because a negative comment from the Ethos Founder is always the first thing everyone sees when they click on my profile, and I had not even known or had the chance to learn about Ethos at the time the negative review was given. I have tried to be active in a positive way, build my reputation, and have tried to send requests hoping Serpin could remove or archive that review, but I have received no response. Building a reputation here does not mean you are not allowed to make mistakes. And when my mistake has been blown up, it has deeply affected the building of my current reputation. When you click on someone’s profile and the first thing that strikes your eyes is a negative review from the founder of the platform you are using, whatever the content is, most people will hesitate a lot if they want to give me a positive review, and most will choose to skip. So what is fairness here?ZzDegenZz · 1119· 1y ago · negative0
‹ Back1,872 of 2,005 · most upvoted firstMore ›