Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
jesse.base.eth
Sk0rp.eth
BlindSquirrel
Corey0001 📉 📈
chosta.eth
SamZ
🫎 Scaply .ink .sand
一川drive 🔴
₿IRB
vaggelis.vavaroutsos.base.ethProfile· Exemplary@serpinxbtOn Ethos
Serpin Taxt
2,004 reviews, 92% of them positive; 152.3K WHUF vouched for them by 113 people.92% positive · 2,004 reviews· 152.3K WHUF vouched· Influence factor 330, above 63% of accountsThe record
From 719 activities · Mar 2026Serpin is the founder and CEO of Ethos, an on-chain reputation protocol addressing a critical gap in Web3 trust and credibility. A 12-year product leader with experience at Atlassian, HouseCallPro, and as an early investor at 0x5f Capital, he brings deep expertise in fraud prevention, identity verification, and high-growth product scaling. Known for relentless focus on product quality, transparency, and community engagement, Serpin actively hosts verification sessions, vibe coding streams, and spaces while maintaining hands-on involvement in slashing bad actors and building systems that reward genuine contribution over manipulation. The community consistently describes him as a visionary builder who prioritizes doing things the right way over chasing hype, with particular respect for his frank communication, willingness to take feedback, and unwavering commitment to making Web3 more credible and human-centered.
What people say
Received · 2KGiven · 1K“Would think twice before listening to what they say publicly”Took allocation to promote a project and lied about said allocation. This is a pretty standard way KOLs/Influencers make money in the space - take % allocation, promote the project, and get paid. It creates an artificial facade of interest when they were actually paid to do it All info from Zachxbt here https://x.com/zachxbt/status/1848028277002137886
on 2K JAY · 1220· 1y ago · negative45
on 2K JAY · 1220· 1y ago · negative45“Raised donation money for an Eth marketing collective, walked away within a year with weak delivery”Emmanuel's account grew in popularity in early 2024, arguing that Eth had a marketing problem. He leveraged his deep technical writing background to push for a marketing collective, called 2077 Collective, to author content and "market ethereum" He contacted me to "invest" (but it was just a donation) and many others including Vitalik in this project. He largely disappeared from the social sphere within months, and as of today (Apr 11 2025) he is walking away from the project. https://x.com/eawosikaa/status/1910706345478697458 QUOTE> "First things first, I have a couple of announcements to make: - I'm stepping away from the @2077Collective/ @2077Research projects. Both will likely take on new names + branding (details TBD) and continue to exist under new leadership ( @Ceci_Sakura007 and team have been holding it down for as long as I can think of). - I'm also taking a break from Ethereum and crypto in general. If it looks like I'm going out like @apolynya , then yes, you guessed correctly. Maybe the details are different (I'm simply exploring different directions in tech), but the conclusion is the same." I argue that this type of behavior where people raise money, especially through donations, and exit on their promises, is net negative behavior for the space. Some references: Lito confirming disappearance after fundriase: https://x.com/litocoen/status/1910743297091387752 Gabe confirming donation & similar experience: https://x.com/lex_node/status/1910728670584422411 Evan Van Ness calling him out originally: https://x.com/evan_van_ness/status/1910019621102444653 https://x.com/evan_van_ness/status/1910068449423786074
on Emmanuel Awosika⚡ · 1454· 1y ago · negative45
on Emmanuel Awosika⚡ · 1454· 1y ago · negative45“Underrated Trade.xyz chad”Poor bro is so new on X that his Ethos score is 950 Absolute masterpiece of a response to the tradexyz / S&P deal in terms of comms. He might be a nobody, but he's working on important stuff and clearly not "questionable"
on B | Unit · 1232· 7mo ago44
on B | Unit · 1232· 7mo ago44“Posting clanker replies”Can't believe this guy has positive reviews, he's literally replying to AI slop with AI slop
on Alex Vent. · 1278· 11mo ago · negative44
on Alex Vent. · 1278· 11mo ago · negative44
“Big fan of Tyler's work, have met him IRL”Fidenza was perfect for web3 gen art and is still legendary in the space. I have mixed feelings about QQL - mostly bc the dutch auction screwed so many buyers over - but it was a cool project that created some cool stuff. He's super nice IRL and authentically cares about his art and buyers
on Tyler Hobbs Studio · 1546· 1y ago44
on Tyler Hobbs Studio · 1546· 1y ago44“trying to sell you some marketing solution crap using hacked number of followers”
on Mr M.A.D 🇬🇧 · 1183· 1y ago · negative44
on Mr M.A.D 🇬🇧 · 1183· 1y ago · negative44“A vision of hope for crypto”She gets it. She supports crypto. She wants to provide transparency into how to regulate and how not to. Our fate rests in Hester's hands, and I feel pretty good about that.
on Commissioner Hester Peirce (Archived) · 1587· 1y ago44
on Commissioner Hester Peirce (Archived) · 1587· 1y ago44“This person looks like they are farming ethos”All reviews have been left by a group of similar wallets I want to believe but her profile indicates higher likelihood of farming than serious usage Happy to leave this as neutral as a warning to others as opposed to outright negative - want to give her a chance to respond
on Big Nana 👩🏻💻🦋 · 1292· 1y ago · neutral44
on Big Nana 👩🏻💻🦋 · 1292· 1y ago · neutral44“Reason to be cautious about Hydraze”People wanted me to negatively review Hydraze instead of slashing him, so I am doing that here. Hydraze promoted what is now alleged in federal court to be a Ponzi scheme- and he wasn't just a bystander. He sat on the governance team of the UA3/StakX syndicate structure (according to the lawsuit), was a signatory on the multi-signature wallet that controlled investor funds (according to the lawsuit), and actively directed his On Chain Buccaneers community to deposit money into these instruments. They even had their own 15% weekly return pool just for OCB (lol) The scheme, TradeAI and later StakX, promised returns like *15% every 10 days with "principal protection."* That's roughly 14,000% annualized. Anyone with basic financial literacy knows that's a Ponzi. A later review of over one million transactions found the trading accounts actually lost more than $4 million; the only way anyone got paid was with money from newer depositors. Hydraze posted on Discord claiming depositors were earning 14.58% in a single week. He told his community the syndicate was "asset backed with $15M worth of Banksy art." He funneled his followers in, and when it collapsed, suddenly claimed he had "zero visibility" into the accounts, and still does today (why wouldn't he?) This isn't a one-off either. Hydraze also recently promoted Aquabot, another project that rugged its community, backed by a shady partnership. The pattern is clear- build trust, promote "opportunities" through partnerships, and when things collapse, distance yourself. His followers / people in OCB aren't partners in these ventures.. they're exit liquidity (and somehow they don't seem to know it?) Some have told me I should wait for the court to decide before taking any action on Ethos. But that argument has never once been the standard for a single slash or review on this platform. Ethos is entirely independent of the court system; it's a community driven credibility layer, not a legal tribunal. No one has ever been required to wait for a verdict before slashing. Credibility scores are meant to reflect what the community knows right now, not what a judge rules two years from now. Those who defended against the slash told me to leave a negative review instead, so here we are. Final statement: his credibility score on Ethos doesn't reflect any of this. His score gives him a stamp of trustworthiness people rely on when deciding whether to follow him into the next opportunity. His trustworthiness comes almost exclusively from a small group of friends in various alpha groups. While this is the definition of reputable per the protocol today, I don't believe Hydraze is as reputable as his followers tend to think he is.
on Hydraze 🏴☠️ · 1763· 7mo ago · negative886
on Hydraze 🏴☠️ · 1763· 7mo ago · negative886“stop writing slop reviews”you’re reviewing stuff using my own words? very odd ngl
on Daniel.hl · 1323· 11mo ago · negative55
on Daniel.hl · 1323· 11mo ago · negative55“Not really sure how to think about doodles going forward”Art is some of the best Captured some of the best times in NFTs But made some odd moves - duplicator, the spaceship thing… idk none of it really ever stuck They are trying to be big into marketing to normies but tbh I am not bullish looking forward
on doodles · 1692· 1y ago · neutral55
on doodles · 1692· 1y ago · neutral55