Sup

240 reviews, 28% of them positive.28% positive · 240 reviews· Influence factor 20, above 4% of accounts

The record

From 124 activities · Apr 2026

Sup is a memecoin that raised over $2 million in presale on Avalanche with promises of AI-powered utility, liquidity additions, and token buybacks, but failed to deliver on these commitments. The team disappeared after launch with minimal communication, no roadmap clarity, and no real product behind the hype—leaving presalers with worthless tokens. The project is widely characterized as a textbook rug pull with glitchy quests, failed airdrops, and radio silence on social media since mid-2024.

What people say

Received · 240 Given · 0

“Worst Meme Based Token built on AVAX”SUP appears to be one of the slowest-executed rug pulls, where the team allegedly raised $2M via presale and added $100k to the liquidity during the launch. They chose MEXC to launch the token, whereas the value dump began well before presale participants could see their allocations. By the time participants received their tokens, the value had significantly decreased. https://x.com/joshdcrypto/status/1916053200739725699 Many warned the community ahead of time about the team's shady past, receiving multiple accusations and FUD. However, the team never provided a valid explanation, often remained silent or dropping out of conversations when tagged. They also frequently deleted their own posts which they made to defend. https://x.com/mikesnft/status/1916209893054599335https://x.com/EstridNFT/status/1915795085977096455 https://x.com/EstridNFT/status/1915818876061028529 The team launched a buyback program using the remaining presale funds without addressing community concerns or answering questions. One notable issue was the accidental transfer of funds to a freshly created MEXC wallet, which remains unaddressed to date. https://x.com/kingthefantacy/status/1916212226052264444 The team lacks transparency regarding fund usage and often avoids or blocks individuals who question them. It’s been a month since the buyback program started, yet there are no posts confirming the amount of tokens burned or the total spent on the buyback. Instead, their main account has been posting irrelevant content. Based on these patterns, I would suggest staying away from @J_May111 and @kangthefantacy who might show up some day in future and launch another token on a different chain.

AgentHunt · 1401· 1y ago · negative15

“Rugged Their own Community in the name of Presale”This project lacks transparency, mishandling presale funds, and contributing to low liquidity on both decentralized and centralized exchanges. Sup is a project which left community, presale investors at a loss and they have even failed to build confidence among early supporters. Cannot be trusted and have to be removed from Ethos.

AgentHunt · 1401· 1y ago · negative15

“Slow Rug Pull”I’ve been tracking @supcoin_ai since its presale hype, and as someone wary of the crypto wild west, it’s a textbook example of why DYOR is non-negotiable. Launched as an AI-powered token with promises of utility, it raised over $2M from investors only to fizzle into obscurity. The X account (@supcoin_ai) has 18.9K followers and a bio playing on "SUP The first rule of $SUP? You pretend you knew about $SUP first," but activity is sparse, with no real updates on roadmap or token delivery. Market cap sits below presale levels, and sentiment screams scam bots defending it only fuel the suspicion. The community’s unanimous: it’s a “shilled rug,” with bad team decisions leading to a worthless token. Reviews warn of a slow rug pull, where funds vanished post-presale, leaving holders with $0 value and no recourse. No utility, just empty hype from “respected” KOLs. Crypto has gems, but @supcoin_aiis the trap avoid it like the plague. Do deep research and stick to RM (risk management) to steer clear of these pitfalls

Andreus · 1269· 1y ago · negative18

“"Another scamm project."”They raised millions of dollars under the guise of a presale, provided no liquidity, and pocketed the money. The token's market value is deplorable. They victimized so many people.

Belialoglu · 1531· 1y ago · negative18

“More Noise Than Value”After checking out @supcoin_ai, the account feels more like a stream of promotional posts than a place to actually learn something. Most of the content is focused on pushing the token or repeating the same type of marketing lines, and it doesn’t give followers much clarity about what the project is really building. Another weak point is the lack of genuine interaction. The posts don’t seem to spark meaningful conversations, and there’s little effort to engage with the community in a way that feels authentic. It comes across more like a broadcast channel than a real Web3 account. Overall, @supcoin_ai doesn’t stand out in a space where originality and transparency matter. It feels repetitive and shallow, which makes it hard to see the long-term value in following.

CryptoPoti · 1164· 1y ago · negative14

“rug coin”SCAM

Trockn · 1249· 1y ago · negative14

“Community Doubts and Credibility Concerns”Supcoin presents itself as a memecoin project building a DeFi and AI ecosystem on Avalanche. While the concept may seem interesting at first glance, several user reports on social media have raised concerns including complaints about lost funds and issues receiving tokens after transactions. Additionally, third-party scam-check platforms have flagged the project with low credibility scores. There is currently no publicly available record of past Twitter handle or display name changes for this account. Given the uncertainty and negative feedback surrounding the project, it's strongly recommended to exercise caution and thoroughly research before engaging or investing.

Mehregan | Web3 · 1306· 1y ago · negative14

“$2M down the drain and not even a meme worth saving”Caught Sup early 'cause the visuals slapped and the AI pitch sounded meta. But damn if that wasn’t all it had. Raised millions, delivered air. Quests broke, airdrop logic made zero sense, and by the time tokens hit, the value already ghosted. No comms, no roadmap, no tech. Just another presale bait with KOL perfume sprayed on top. Got rugged so slow it almost felt polite.

ProMint · 1539· 1y ago · negative17

“Betrayed from the start”I put money into the presale thinking it might be a fun meme play, but instead it turned into one of the worst experiences I’ve had in crypto. The moment they chose to launch on MEXC with barely any liquidity, it was obvious something was off. Watching the price tank before presalers even had a chance to breathe felt like being slapped in the face. What hurts the most isn’t just the money, it’s the silence that followed. No real answers, no accountability, just a founder with a shady past disappearing into thin air. You start questioning yourself - why did I trust them, why didn’t I listen to the warnings? It leaves you angry, but mostly just tired. Another rug, another scar on the space.

qatqa · 1319· 1y ago · negative17

“Same promises, nothing new”

Nanami · 1269· 1y ago · negative17

“Scammer Sup”If youu look at this coin chart, you can see how the team emptied the currency.Now they've announced a buyback, and the funniest part is that the $300,000 models are already under warranty.But it's not funny. Always do your research; there are many projects like this, so you need to be careful.

serry.sand · 1273· 10mo ago · negative13

“RUG Programmed" – A Deep Dive into the Red Flags”A Project Built on Promises, Not Potential. This token is a textbook example of a slow-burn rug pull, with no legitimate use case or team to back it up. Here’s why you should steer clear: Project Assessment No Value Proposition: A "totally unnecessary" project with no clear utility or innovation. Scam Team: The team lacks credibility, and the token’s future value is projected at $0. Market Cap Warning: The current market cap is below the presale funds raised—a major red flag.

Rawr Drops · 1159· 1y ago · negative13

‹ Back72 of 240 · most upvoted firstMore ›