MoversGrethos↓351aadvark↓296Majdi↓264Abhi | AP Collective↓255Meiv↓243TradeEthos↑21.3%Pump.fun↑56.8%clioagent.eth↓10.5%ZachXBT↑30.4%VouchesSerpin Taxt100 WHUF → PerilousSeeker44 WHUF → EthosYura40 WHUF → DmitryTheo Tzu9 WHUF → ryskReviewsngbshpend.eth 🍌positive · 73 upvotesPerilouspositive · 62 upvotesDmitrypositive · 22 upvotesAxiomnegative · 15 upvotes
Profile· Known@waleswooshOn Ethos
wale.moca 🐳

wale.moca 🐳

858 reviews, 90% of them positive; 267 WHUF vouched for them by 2 people.90% positive · 858 reviews· 267 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 243, above 48% of accounts

The record

From 117 activities · Mar 2026

Influential Web3 and NFT voice on crypto Twitter with a large following, known for consistent content on market trends, project analysis, and early-stage opportunities. However, reputation is significantly damaged by undisclosed paid promotions—most notably receiving $8,000 USDC to promote the Trove ICO, which later collapsed as a scam. This led to a formal slash on Ethos with 92.5% community support. Pattern of undisclosed ads, deleted posts after projects failed, and collaborations with questionable projects (DeepNode, others) without clear disclosure undermine credibility despite acknowledgment of past mistakes and some supporters' belief he has learned from them.

“An influencer who knows how to scam his own community”I discovered him as an active creator of Web3-related content and information on X. This helped him grow his account and establish himself as an influencer. For him, the good times began here—but for his followers, that's where the trouble started. But why? As we all know, influencers often receive deals and information from projects to promote them. The positive side is that these deals benefit the influencers, and it's up to them to decide which ones to accept. However, he began sharing promotions for some spammy projects. While he made money from them, his supporters—who followed him for his content—ended up suffering losses. As a result, he is now being slashed on Ethos: https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/354/involved-in-undisclosed-ad-for-scam-project This is always a reminder: In the crypto world, always do your own research (DYOR) before taking any action. Now, let’s explore this situation together step by step, as curious learners. What do you think makes the shift from “helpful content creator” to “promoter of questionable projects” happen for someone in Web3? Is it purely financial temptation, or could there be other pressures at play? When an influencer starts promoting projects that later turn out to be scams or poor investments, who do you believe carries more responsibility—the influencer for not disclosing or vetting properly, or the followers for not doing their own research? Why might that balance feel unfair to the followers?Aditya · 1256· 9mo ago · negative2
‹ Back744 of 858 · most upvoted firstMore ›