ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 90 activities · Apr 2026

A crypto veteran and rigorous investigator known for thorough sybil detection, human verification work, and evidence-backed reviews on Ethos. Respected for digging into patterns, calling out bad actors with receipts rather than speculation, and maintaining ethical principles across Web3—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain accusations. Active mentor and community builder who mentors others on research methodology, writes detailed project analysis, and consistently contributes to ecosystem integrity.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

“Spammer, potential phishing”Posts a bunch of posts with fake announcements from Binance and tags everyone: "Crypto Pump News just dropped — stay sharp"

on Brk ksck · 1185· 6mo ago · negative28

“A Beginner with Great Potential”I also met Orkney through the Monad ecosystem while discussing the Amertis project not long ago. We've maintained a good friendship since then; I know I can always turn to him if needed. The Monad ecosystem, much like the Monad project itself, has been in development for a long time. However, this lengthy period has attracted many developers. Yet, it would all be for nothing without true ecosystem enthusiasts like Orkney. I often gauge a project's potential by how many of my peers are deeply involved in it. For me, that's a green light for investment, including my time and attention. Thank you, Orkhey.

on orkney · 1401· 1y ago28

“This is the new X account of user Gladiy”This X account belongs to a registered Ethos user, [brother Gladiy](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x6f93e4a35e5BD9491A414A3Fb10DC50005cA1A6B). The Credibility Score of his active profile is 1,304 points. He has community support through reviews, and he also writes reviews for other users, contributing to the protocol. For a very long time, his X account linked to his profile has been suspended (likely permanently). There have been many attempts to resolve this, but without success. Currently, his reputation within the protocol suffers because of his suspended Twitter account. No one can assess his social signals and behavior via X, and his account seems incomplete. Replacing (connecting a new X account) is not possible due to internal restrictions, which require his Credibility Score to be 1,600+. Reaching such a trust level is also impossible because of his incomplete profile (including reasons related to EIP15). Given the situation, he now has two options: 1/ Try by all means to increase his Credibility Score to 1,600, which is practically an impossible task for him. 2/ Mark the old profile as obsolete and start over from scratch. Even if I and others manage to verify him to Human status, his old account would reach a score of 1,404 - still insufficient for the conditions required to change the X account on his profile. The 1,600-point restriction was designed before Human verification was integrated into Ethos. That Score was intended as a signal of trust and seriousness. It was much easier to achieve before than it is now (EIP14-15). Today, however, verification is also a result of trust. I propose changing the conditions from a Score of 1,600 points to 1,400 +/ Human verification. Thanks to this change, many users affected by X suspensions could update their data in Ethos without losing credibility, provided they have Human status. For many, a Credibility Score of 1,600 is an unattainable goal and serves as motivation for grinding and abusing the system. Today, Gladiy is completing bounty tasks to earn XP and apply for verification. I propose helping him with his issue and considering the possibility of changing the conditions in light of the new circumstances and integrations for everyone.

on gladiy (newacc arc) · 1160· 5mo ago · neutral27

“Unknown project, potential risks”Practically nothing is known about the project, so it's SUPPOSEDLY an NFT project and SUPPOSEDLY related to AI agents. Currently, there is a "Whitelist" campaign for a free NFT mint. Some content creators are voluntarily involved in this, but through a form with the goal of getting on the WL and extracting profit from it. On their behalf, content with artwork is being created that carries no informational value (because there's practically nothing to talk about, since nothing is known about the project). Potential address drain. The interface prompts you to connect your X account, provide an EVM address, and complete a short survey. It's unclear where the engagement on the very first posts came from. As of today, there is no reason to trust. The official account reposted a user https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/Tma_420, who has an "established" credibility score on Ethos. In the future, if the project turns out to be a scam, every content creator will receive negative reviews for promoting a project to their audience that they themselves are not sure about and know nothing about.

on remeko · 967· 7mo ago · neutral27

“From Content Creator to Expert”In the 3 years I’ve known Fairu, I’ve observed his remarkable transformation as he has grown stronger, more skilled, and more experienced with each passing day, post, and valuable idea. He evolved from a newcomer into an experienced project ambassador, then into a community leader, and ultimately the founder of his own community, Berserk DAO. This progression represents a commendable journey in the crypto space. Fairu continues to expand his influence by engaging with new communities and projects, leading others along the way. He provides valuable insights and practical knowledge, drawing from his extensive experience. His expertise is a rich source of information gained through hard work, overcoming challenges, and achieving personal milestones. I don’t know what initially drew him to crypto or when he arrived, but I do know that through a year of collective effort, he earned my trust and established himself as someone reliable. I believe that the true driving force behind any project is not just its technology or investments, but the people who are passionately dedicated to the idea and remain loyal to it even more than the founders themselves. Everything is built on people, and it is we who give startups life, regardless of rewards and prospects.

on Fairu 🕵️‍♂️ · 1466· 1y ago27

“Economic Exploit”This review is intended to capture the fact of the MEV (which manifested as an economic exploit during early token bootstrapping) during a critical phase for the project and to reflect its impact on the project's credibility score. As some freelance advisors [report](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702193/ive-effectively-been-advising-landbid-but-im-not-a-dev-and-im-not-internally~): "Last night there was an exploit that created more than 75 ETH worth of sell pressure, which seriously damaged a large part of the project. The wallets involved are visible on DEX Screener." // Also, it should be mentioned that the "independent advisor" is self-proclaimed and has a reputation as a KOL in CT. He has a vested interest in this project, which may be justified by a paid partnership. As the project itself [reports](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702195/a-few-hours-ago-we-detected-attacker-bots-exploiting-an-economic-edge-in-the~): "A few hours ago we detected attacker bots exploiting an economic edge in the bootstrap window of WorldMiner, the TWAP oracle hadn't accumulated enough observations yet, which left the genesis price pinned to its starting floor and made early continent mining temporarily over-profitable." To some extent, this was an economic exploit, as a result of which the team was forced to update the mining method to V2. There is no evidence that the attackers were external participants. Likewise, there is no evidence that it was not the team. Some members have expressed their opinion about the project, calling it a rug pull, which is quite understandable given the concerns and the novelty of the project. KOLs with a questionable reputation have been spotted promoting the project. Be careful.

on Land Bid · 921· 5mo ago · negative166

“Engagement farmer”I noticed this guy with his beautiful slogans and giveaways. His reputation on Ethos is already untrustworthy, with 14 reviews, zero of which are positive. They all boil down to the fact that he's a scammer and a larper. My review is just another nail in his coffin. This guy got [really upset](https://x.com/0xKharon/status/2052884946663129109) when I showed him his reputation on Ethos, specifically the AI summary.

on KAI 🐦‍🔥 · 1082· 5mo ago · negative26

“A Valuable Acquaintance”Romj came to my attention about 8-10 months ago during discussions in the Monero community regarding the FCMP++ update, which improves the blockchain's privacy and optimization. Since then, we have continued our communication, sharing thoughts and ideas with each other, and helping the community grow in terms of its audience and ecosystem progress.

on 𝓡•𝓞•𝓜•𝓘 · 1437· 8mo ago26

“Libertarian / Crypto anarchist”A legendary figure, spanning from IT startups to politics to crypto. No longer with us today, but his memory will live on forever. Some may simply know him from McAfee antivirus, while for others he is a crypto-anarchist advocating for human freedom. His turbulent life left a permanent mark on history. From prisons and persecution to creating his own DEX, supporting Bitcoin and Monero, and making bold public statements. John saw cryptocurrencies (especially Bitcoin and Monero) as a tool for liberation from government control over money, actively opposing financial surveillance, the banking system, and regulations. A supporter of cypherpunk and crypto-anarchy, using cryptography and decentralized technologies to build a society beyond state control. Crypto, he said, is the "golden key to freedom from financial slavery". His final years were spent in a Spanish prison, where he was found dead. That is truly a long story. John McAfee's story ended in 2021.

on John McAfee · 1444· 6mo ago278

“Writes low-quality reviews”I don't know what this guy's goal is, but his reviews carry no informational value. Lately, all of them have been written as part of a review bounty. Low-quality contribution that only creates noise. If you have nothing to say, it's better to just stay silent. One step away from losing your contribution XP. Bye bye, contribution XP.

on BrenzyIdl (❖,❖)🫎⚡️ZugChain · 1128· 5mo ago · negative25

“Sybil Account”This account belongs to a different owner, who voluntarily revealed themselves after realizing their mistake. Original confession [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/691358/fixing-my-mistake).

on degenkenzie · 1187· 7mo ago · negative25

on CLI ◈ · 1187· 7mo ago · negative25

‹ Back144 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›