AdeXBT (Rich arc)

121 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 121 reviews· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accounts

The record

From 8 activities · May 2026

Known for authentic, honest reviews backed by real evaluation rather than AI-generated content or project shilling. A steady, insightful presence across Web3 communities (Eclipse, Monad, ASC) who brings genuine opportunities to others' attention, offers clear ecosystem breakdowns, and maintains approachable, consistent community engagement without noise-making.

What people say

Received · 121 Given · 389

“scam”9k collection 2$ per mint 18k scammed, after mintout, dev starts posting some erotic contents(most likely out of joy of scamming people). os: https://opensea.io/collection/prismals-9000

on Prismals · 928· 51d ago · negative7

“grifter”His words, plus some fact-check from me "i spent $300K (obviously a lie) building a crypto game It made $0 Last week, we launched @Jaileddotfun a prison simulator on Solana It was our most anticipated game since our last hit game @addicteddotfun (it wasn't the most anticipated game, this is the game where early access was given to influencers, it was basically a token launch where influencers get to buy first for at least 48 hours before the public, I already made a negative review on the conduct of that account, they farmed CT) The numbers before launch looked insane: 10M organic views (no paid marketing is a lie, they had tier F kols shilling codes, cold dming almost everyone on CT, farmed views with fake promises) 40K followers in 30 days (because you farmed it) more attention than addicted got it felt like we're about to ship another banger But the results were launch tweet: 200K views users: ~1000 rev: $300K (mainly trading fee) - Cost: $288K 3 full time devs + 4 audits. (another lie) = profit $12K (another lie if we consider all the insider dumps to the public) We rejected all VC money (lie) and chose to be an independent game studio, so each game's revenue is extremely important to keep shipping new games (lies, they abandon these games after 1 week of cashing out) and we completely fucked up (at least one truth) so far we shipped 5 games (5 rugs) here's the break down of each games rev 1. @infecteddotfun → -$50K 2. @Insddotfun → $0 3. @addicteddotfun → +$4M 4. @pussycattech → $0 5. @Jaileddotfun → +$12K before infected, we shipped 5+ mini games and all made $0 failure rate is 99.9% that’s the reality of building crypto games but one hit changes everything just like we saw with addicted compared to Defi Kingdoms, Axie infinity, Stepn, it’s still peanuts tho we just need to keep shipping faster and better till we build a biggest crypto game in history we’re now building an onchain heist game (just last week you built an on-chain jail game, bruh) Drop a comment if you want early access to @Heistedxyz (THIS IS THE BANGER, HE IS LAUNCHING ANOTHER ONE, JAILEDOTFUN WAS LIKE 1 WEEK AGO) (if you want to participate in anything he launches, be sure to be among the tier-F KOLs who will get early access. If not, do not waste your time or money here, or else you will lose both. Stay safe.) (In his own words, Jaileddotfun would remain live but their focus is no longer on it. This should in fact be a slash, but these tier F kols won't let me breathe.) To those who don't understand the grifting MO here, EVERY NEW GAME comes with a token launch, tier F kols & the team get access to buy the token first, then at least 48hrs later they open it up to the public & dump on them.

on Kohei · 1249· 4mo ago · negative7

“building privacy on Solana”Arcium is building privacy-focused infrastructure on Solana. The project appears to be aimed at enabling more confidential computation or privacy-preserving functionality, which is a meaningful area if execution matches the vision. Still early from my perspective, so I’m mainly watching for product maturity, real adoption, and how clearly the team communicates practical use cases over time.

on Arcium · 1633· 4mo ago · neutral7

“Best DLP I have used so far”dango is a perp dex but built on its own l1, what i admire most is their dlp, i have participated in LP on multiple perp dex, this is the first one that actually feels like it works, the hedging actually hedges the liquidity, gud tek, although they need to work on their uptime, they go into maintainance mode way too much but i guess its the price you pay for excellence(kidding), the are still very early so this review might change later on

on dango🍡 · 1292· 5mo ago7

“scamming over a non-monetary asset”I’m leaving this negative review because there are multiple public reports on this profile alleging scamming during trait trades in the the1969ETH Discord. Based on the activity summary shown here, the main accusation is non-delivery after receiving items, followed by blocking the other trader. The profile currently shows 3 reviews with 0% positive feedback, and the AI activity summary states: “Multiple reports of scamming in trait trading on the1969ETH Discord, involving non-delivery after receiving items and subsequently blocking traders.” That pattern is also repeated in the visible review excerpts. One visible report says: “Be careful @Cloudine77 is a scammer. He scammed @ibild_ 1150 bust and a background on discord…” and further claims that after receiving the items, parts of the Discord chat were deleted and the user was blocked on both X and Discord. Another visible excerpt says: “You just scammed @Ibild_. U took her bust and background… came back and refused to return her things.” There is also a separate scam alert shown on the page involving trait trading, where the poster claims they sent an eye trait for a skin and were blocked afterward. Taken together, these reports show a repeated allegation of accepting assets in a trade, failing to complete the deal, and then cutting off communication. Because of the number of similar accusations visible on this page, I would strongly advise others to be extremely cautious before trading with this account. If you do engage, keep full screenshots, confirm terms clearly in advance, and avoid sending anything first unless there is a trusted middleman involved.we see many things daily in this space, but it gets really intense when you hear stories of people scamming over things that literally have no value. I do not understand why you'd need to scam someone over things like this if you can get your own.

on Dami💌🧞 · 1192· 6mo ago · negative7

“Young & winning”I recently met tobi Rama, i actually thought she was a boy because of the name, turns out the best alpha caller in our group for the month of December 2025 is a 17 year old girl, she is super hardworking, ready to learn, ready to help & teach, i don’t know what I was doing when i was 17 but definitely not this, she is a very intelligent individual.

on TOBIRAMA · 1234· 9mo ago7

“Action packed rpg”The team behind this project are quite based, been following the project for over two years and i can say playcalamity is one of the very few nft projects that never left, they kept trying to deliver and have now fully delivered the game, from base to treasure and now to ronin, this team doesn't take no for an answer, wish we could have more projects like this in web3

on Calamity · 1253· 1y ago7

“Gamer”Farouk is one of the few top crypto gamer i know, every gaming peohect that has happened in the past 2years have had this guy participates in them,a night alpha caller in our demo, he only operates at night, gets the alpha ready by morning and disperse to anyone interested, with endless dose of alpha, he is an integral part of every community he joins, super active. Very supportive, very trustworthy, he is reliable

on El_farook.eth · 1277· 1y ago8

“scammers”prev: stabledollar_us rugged btw, wrecked alot of users who believed in them, deactivated x but back with another name & possibly here to scam again & steal.

on Ratatouille · 921· 51d ago · negative6

“untrustworthy(rug?)”Account deactivated at the moment Previous rug name: chaintraders (minted out on Robinhood) x: chaintradersnft This was more of a slow rug. It sincerely shouldn't be a negative review, but the team deactivated x, marketed itself as a freemint, had numerous collabs with different communities & promised to airdrop to said communities after mint out as it wasn't a freemint, 2500 was supposed to be minted & airdropped to whitelist holders whilst the hype pushed the remaining 7500 at a paid mp, they didn't airdrop any nft to any commuity. They also appeared to have dumped some of the team's allocation. They would most likely reactivate the account soon enough but with a different name

on Grace · 928· 2mo ago · negative6

“ruggers”Mooncer minted on Robinhood chain, their mechanism was tied to Mancer. You buy $mancer & mint with that, 10 per wallet. After it sold out, the dev instantly sold the accrued $mancer, then bridged it out of Robinhood. X has been radio silent ever since then; I expect either a name change soon or deactivation.

on mooncers · 928· 2mo ago · negative6

“Possible scam collection”Identical art to @mooncer on Robinhood that rugged yesterday; the only change in this art is in the eyes. This time it's not a mancer nft, its a music NFT.

on Haifa · 928· 2mo ago · negative6

‹ Back324 of 389 · most upvoted firstMore ›