Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“An interesting blockchain solution that combines the speed and low fees of Solana with the security of Ethereum”Expanding DeFi capabilities, innovative fee market. I am a little concerned about the reliance on external platforms, if Celestia starts experiencing outages, Eclipse performance may decrease

Elenathere · 1291· 1y ago · neutral15

“Failed by greed , From Believer to Betrayed”It’s honestly painful for me to write this because I was once one of the biggest fans and supporters of Eclipse. For nearly a year, I gave them my time, money, and full attention. I tested their endless stream of useless dApps, tapped a million times on that cow, poured ETH into their liquidity pools, and even held scammy NFTs all because I believed in the project and the vision they sold us. But what could have been a powerful tech and strong community was ruined by greed and deception from within the team. Looking back, the red flags were always there, but I ignored them, blinded by excitement and loyalty. They lied to the community over and over. First, they swore there would never be a points program, then launched Turbo Tap. Later, they promised no money-based points system, and suddenly introduced Passive Grass. Each broken promise chipped away at trust, until there was nothing left. The final betrayal was how they handled ASC holders pure disrespect and disregard. The drama and fallout are too big to summarize here; anyone can go see the wreckage themselves. In the end, Eclipse rugged its own community, destroying both trust and what could have been an incredible piece of tech.

Ehsan | احسان · 1279· 1y ago · negative15

“cuckfest”This might just be the worst executed launch of 2025. And i do not say this because of "airdrop". I never farmed it but i watched from the sidelines how the community collapsed on itself. An active voice in the community, Alucard constantly berated other communities regardless if they threw shades or posted a constructive criticism. Do not even get me started on the pointless cow tapping the team came up with or the daylight grift which is the asc nft

Kennylawrence · 1336· 1y ago · negative15

“People are leaving”There are good applications on the network, but there's no on-chain community. Key products like Bitz and ASC failed. This led many people to abandon the network. Marketing must be implemented to inject new liquidity into the network, and incentives must be provided. Otherwise, it's heading towards a downward spiral.

Seymenyunus · 1349· 1y ago · neutral15

“They had potential”Everything that happened with Eclipse was a shame; for me, it had potential. Their leader, Alucard, destroyed everything, turning the community into a kingdom of fear. A toxic cult and community. The ecosystem simply became a tap with incentives to win an airdrop, with no real value. They promised to reward the community, and in the end, they laughed at it. They only rewarded their OGs for spending all day talking on their Discord about the weather or what they were going to have for dinner. A shame, and in a very unbalanced way. They had potential, but they brought their own ruin on themselves.

ScreenBooy · 1298· 1y ago · negative15

“Not what I expected”Eclipse lied to everyone. They deceived the community. I spent $100 on tapping the turbo cow but I got nothing in return. The painful part was that Tapping manually was the most difficult thing I have done in my life. I wasted my time and resources but got nothing. The team should not be trusted.

Ogoebony| HUDL (Ø,G) KGeN (✸,✸) 🍊,💊 X · 1274· 1y ago · negative15

“Unreliable and Unprofessional”I had high hopes for @EclipseFND, but the experience was honestly disappointing. The communication was vague, timelines kept shifting, and the final delivery didn’t meet the promised quality. It felt like professionalism took a backseat throughout the entire process. There was very little attention to detail, and feedback was either ignored or poorly addressed. For the time and money invested, the outcome was far from satisfactory. I wouldn’t recommend this service . Definitely not what I expected.

shana (privacy szn) · 1214· 1y ago · negative15

“Why Eclipse Fails Its Community: Empty Words and Rigged Airdrops”Eclipse promised big but failed to deliver. The team stays silent when questioned, and their airdrops feel rigged and unfair. This project lacks transparency and genuine community support. Web3 deserves better than empty hype and broken trust.

MOFRAD⟠ |'Noya' · 1266· 1y ago · negative15

“Strong community and best l2 chain”Eclipse Chain is building one of the most exciting modular L2s in the space combining Solana’s lightning-fast SVM with Ethereum’s battle-tested security. It’s designed for developers who want both speed and trust, offering EVM and SVM compatibility in a single environment. Whether you’re into high-performance DeFi, gaming, or next-gen apps, Eclipse gives you the scalability to build without compromise. @EclipseFND is a goldmine of updates, dev insights, and community alpha definitely worth following if you’re serious about the future of modular blockchains.

𝓢𝓽𝓾𝓷𝓷𝓪™️ · 1165· 1y ago15

“Toxic community & founder will mass extract from 'community'”The Eclipse community is arguably the most toxic in all of crypto. Their community lead, Alucard, profited from the community before the token generation event (TGE) by selling ASC NFTs, reportedly earning $1 million according to TMB. Even before Eclipse went mainnet, their ex CEO Neel Somani, engaged in an undisclosed token sale with Niraj Pant, a former general partner at Polychain Capital, which violated Polychain’s policies. Somani conducted an OTC sale of Eclipse tokens worth “8 figures” for context. Somani stepped back in 2024 May due to sexual misconduct allegations, he would slid into every women's dms sending obscene atrocious pictures. Eclipse hasn't handled the situation well and right now as TGE is around the corner, they are trying to screw the whole community. Please don't bridge any funds to Eclipse, transferring money to eclipse is showing support to rapists and scammers. Stay away from this chain.

MEGA RUKIA · 1253· 1y ago · negative15

“Tech Seems Good But....”Something seems off. I will revist this review after TGE to see how that is handled.

Schlitz · 1353· 1y ago · neutral15

“Broken Community Experience”К сожалению, мой опыт с проектом Eclipse оказался крайне негативным. Сообщество токсичное и недружелюбное, вместо поддержки и идей участники часто сталкиваются с агрессией и непониманием. Работа модераторов только усугубляет ситуацию - они ведут себя предвзято и не умеют выстраивать нормальную коммуникацию. Впечатление складывается такое, что проект сосредоточен не на развитии, а на выкачке денег с комьюнити. Это разочаровывает и полностью убивает доверие.

Margaret · 1305· 1y ago · negative18

‹ Back144 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›