Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“Unreliable, Useless, Anti community token project”Eclipse, along with its CEO Alucard, broke their promises, effectively leaving the token and the community to die. They destroyed people's trust. Their welcoming stance before the TGE became history after the launch. Their tokens will soon be history, too.

Erso · 1308· 1y ago · negative18

“stay away from eclipse”Eclipse not only lacks the potential to thrive as a project, but considering its poor management, suppression of criticism, and lack of transparency, it is set to collapse. With the knowledge that 92% of blockchain projects fail (Forbes, 2019) and the evidence presently at hand, this project will join the long list of abandoned blockchains very shortly. Investment in Eclipse is not innocent; it essentially amounts to investing in a fake and unreliable system. It is better to avoid this project and look towards more credible ecosystems

sadegh.base🟦 · 1333· 1y ago · negative18

“Useless chain”Chain with nothing unique, just tap tap scam shit.

ray tio · 1371· 1y ago · negative18

“We dont need something new but something better”I was drawn to Eclipse since the beginning of Turbo Tap. It was fun, but the way the team executed the airdrop was disappointing. The main eclipse chain literally nukes to zero after TGE. The team sybilled the whole supply and disappointed believers who bought ASC and spent a lot in the ecosystem.

Abba 🐂🀄 · 1290· 10mo ago · negative14

“fooled the community”the team of this project just fooled the community with thier lies and all. i don't trust them at all. now they are all gone.

Novadust 💢 · 1277· 10mo ago · negative14

“A good chained married by execution.”Eclipse brought about a novel idea an eth l2. But it was quickly ruined by a useless rap to earn game that caused the protocol to be mocked them , then came the airdrop everyone was shocked at the execution it was very sloppy and the community was left unhappy then the coin started to crater and to cap it all , the team started shit posting, honestly the idea was good but traction was just not their greed and misexcecutions that killed what could have been better

Tunde · 1176· 10mo ago · negative14

“Eclipse bad launch”Eclipse did very little after their bad launch to win their community bad. It's as though the project had no post TGE plans despite raising good money and having the stage, no doubt they had a good tech and a good idea, if it were a different team I think the results may have been different.

DASH W♡RLD · 1270· 11mo ago · negative14

“clown”clown project. that's it

Ginger · 1238· 11mo ago · negative14

“dünyanın en kötü airdrobu ve projesi”dünyanın en kötü airdrobunu yaptılar gerçekten çok büyük rezillik yaptıkları büyük ibnelik zaten yok oldular kendileri bile kendileriyle dalga geçiyolar böyle reziller mainnet kullanıcılarına para vermemek nedir

Fenas Kripto · 1188· 12mo ago · negative14

“eclipse was a bad experience”I was an early participant in the Eclipse ecosystem I minted their first NFT and bridged it to their mainnet. The project initially promised fairness, transparency, and a strong sense of community. However, over time, it became clear that these values were not upheld. Despite their public messaging, the team prioritized their own interests, ultimately extracting value from users while reserving the true benefits for themselves.

afaringan.eth · 1284· 1y ago · negative14

“I was confused by the low rating of around 400”And then I saw that it was Eclipse and my suspicions were confirmed, since I had not had a particularly successful experience with this platform before..

Celsius · 1279· 1y ago · negative14

“scamteam”Post-TGE, EclipseFND has drawn significant backlash, particularly on community platforms like Ethos Network (a decentralized reputation system using reviews, vouches, and slashes to detect scams). Many users accuse the team of poor communication, hidden fees, and mishandling the airdrop/community funds. This has led to slashes (credibility penalties) and negative reviews, with some calling it a "disappointment" or even "scamteam."

Jor⚡️h ⇪ · 1142· 1y ago · negative14

‹ Back156 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›