Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

““Great Idea, Poor Follow-Through””The project had a solid concept, but the execution just never lived up to it. The team promised a lot, yet failed to deliver anything truly useful or substantial. They struggled to bring quality projects onto the chain, and it became obvious after the hype around their airdrop campaigns faded. By the time the airdrop was finally announced, the chain already felt inactive. The token itself didn’t carry enough value to make the distribution meaningful, which only fueled frustration in the community. Personally, I’m not upset about the airdrop itself — I’m just disappointed. What bothers me is how much potential was left on the table because the promises weren’t backed up by real delivery.

han · 1272· 1y ago · negative13

“Good Product with Terrible Execution”It just seems to me that the team overpromised and never got to deliver actual useful stuff. They never managed to onboard quality projects to their chain and that is what showed after their airdrop campaigns. The chain just kinda died and then the airdrop announcement came. The token just didn't have enough value to provide for a good airdrop and that is what got most people mad. I am not one of those people that's mad about the airdrop, but that is disappointed by what was promised and never delivered.

Smorzo · 1353· 1y ago · negative13

“a shady project”A lot of users put in a ton of time and money into this scammer, but in the end, all they got was losses. Honestly, I’ve never seen a scam this big before. These guys are opening a whole new level of scamming. Shame on you, scammers.

Luca · 1309· 1y ago · negative13

“bad”

karasakal.eth · 1304· 1y ago · negative13

“The Eclipse team showed rare maturity by committing to zero rewards for a full year , true integrity in action🔥💚”

sara · 1224· 1y ago13

“Disgusting l2”I didn't take part in this project. But I listen the reviews of my friend about this project and know that is disgusting L2 chain with command of scammers. The last banger from him: https://x.com/EclipseFND/status/1980346706190594460. Really mfkers, why the hell doing this?

AndrewD · 1676· 12mo ago · negative16

“Fucked up project”they disappointed and rugged thier comminity at large

Marhk · 1282· 10mo ago · negative12

“Talk is cheap. Eclipse everything”Eclipse came in with big talk, Ethereum security mixed with Solana speed. On paper, that’s strong, and the idea of SVM on ETH L2 got many people excited. But the TGE really shook confidence. No real apps to engage with, NFT side flopped, and community trust took a hit with the way things were handled after launch. The tech is interesting, but trust is harder to rebuild than code.

Semilore · 1190· 1y ago · neutral12

“turbotap is everything?”eclipse completely mishandled its airdrop farming the community for months and then rewarding almost nothing to the real ecosystem users instead handing out massive allocations to apps like turbotap while the people who actually supported and believed in the project got left behind it felt unfair unbalanced and out of touch with the community that carried them

Sisyphos · 1343· 1y ago · negative12

“Why Eclipse Might Be the Future of Modular L2s ?”1. Solana UX, Ethereum Security 🔐 Eclipse brings the speed and dev experience of Solana to Ethereum by running SVM as a Layer 2 — best of both worlds. 2. Modular & Scalable ⚙️ It uses Celestia for data availability and Ethereum for settlement, making it a true modular chain with high performance and decentralization. 3. Dev-Friendly for Solana Projects 💻 Solana dApps can migrate easily without rewriting — opening the door for Solana-native apps to tap into the Ethereum ecosystem.

Boomoney.🕯 · 1222· 1y ago12

“Eclipse's Hype Train Derails”Scrolling through @EclipseFND's old tweets feels like a loop of the same cryptic hype – stuff like "gsvm" and "eclipse everything" that promises the moon but delivers mostly vague teasers and delayed vibes. It's frustrating how they keep dropping these "big if true" hints without much follow-through on actual Solana-Ethereum magic, leaving followers hanging for real progress. Overall, it comes off as more marketing fluff than solid dev work, kinda disappointing for a project that's supposed to be game-changing.

Printezis · 1289· 1y ago · negative8

“Остров сокровищ. Трагическая и поучительная история о мальчике Бобби Эклипсе, который любил деньги”С первых дней проект производит впечатление, что в приоритете сбор денег, а не продукт. На мой взгляд, маркетинг громкий, а содержание хромает. Ниже по пунктам, почему я отношусь к Эклипсу отрицательно: Коммуникация размытая. Много лозунгов, мало конкретики по срокам и измеримым результатам Продуктовая ценность неочевидна. Обещаний много, ясной дорожной карты и демонстраций прогресса почти нет Токеномика тяжёлая. Фокус на аллокациях и раундах, при этом непонятно, что получает конечный пользователь Прозрачность процесса слабая. Отчётности по использованию средств и статусу задач мало, вопросы из комьюнити часто остаются без чётких ответов Итог простой – ощущение, что Бобби Эклипс копит монеты, а про смысл и пользу забывает. Я бы рекомендовал держаться на дистанции, пока не появится понятная ценность, прозрачная отчётность и стабильное исполнение обещаний.

Dreaman · 1312· 1y ago · negative8

‹ Back372 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›