Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“Too Much Hype, Not Enough Practical Clarity”While Eclipse gets a lot of attention, it often feels like the hype moves faster than the actual user experience. The project talks about big ideas, but concrete details and hands-on usability feel limited. More transparency around real progress would make the project feel more grounded.

Santosh · 1207· 10mo ago9

“the worst L2 on this year?”I’m not fully up to speed on everything that happened with Eclipse, I’ve only seen the posts floating around X. but a lot of people on my timeline seemed disappointed with how the team handled the airdrop distribution, the dump price after TGE, and a few other things. I’m staying neutral here, because for all we know the team might’ve simply chosen to allocate a larger share of rewards pools to early supporters and contributors instead of on chain testers.

acumalaka · 1302· 10mo ago · neutral9

“Jokers”Todo se derrumbo desde su salida a mercado, no tuvo ninguna utilidad ni adopción dentro del ecosistema cripto, muy criticado

Seb 🇵🇪 · 1268· 10mo ago · negative9

“kötü proje, kötü airdrop, kötü ekip”aylarca mainneti kullandım, eth mintledim, belki 100 dolar yaktım mainnetinde ama ben sırf turbo oyununu oynamadığım için not eligible oldum. İĞRENÇ

0x3b2A...Cb33 · 1148· 11mo ago9

“never trust blindly”never trust blindly this type of project, they only focus to scam and fake engagement so they can take more funding by fooling investors

Mayank.eth · 1294· 1y ago · negative9

“A Risky Venture Undermined by an Unfair Airdrop”The Eclipse project, which initially generated significant excitement in the crypto community, has since caused deep disappointment and mistrust. The most striking example of this was its airdrop distribution, which was handled in an extremely unfair and unbalanced way. Instead of a transparent and equitable process, the system ended up favoring a small group while leaving behind many early supporters and contributors who had genuinely engaged with the project. This poorly managed airdrop not only damaged user trust but also contradicted Eclipse’s claims of decentralization and community focus. The lack of clear communication and transparency from the team further fueled criticism, raising serious concerns about the project’s integrity and future. On the technical side, Eclipse still fails to deliver the performance it promised. Network issues and a subpar user experience only add to the doubts surrounding its long-term sustainability. In conclusion, Eclipse has become a risky and untrustworthy project, losing the confidence of its community through a combination of poor management, lack of transparency, and a disastrous airdrop distribution.

Ozan.bob · 1224· 1y ago · negative9

“From the Hype to the Allocation Drama”Eclipse started out with a big vision as the first Layer 2 on Ethereum built on the SVM, aiming to deliver faster and more efficient performance than other L2s. On the tech side, it actually did well with fast transactions, low fees, and a stable environment for dApps, but community sentiment dropped sharply after the airdrop because many testers and long time contributors felt the allocation was unfair. Some groups ended up receiving way more tokens than expected while people who had been consistently active for months got very little, and that imbalance became the main reason Eclipse’s reputation took a hit. Even so, the tech itself is still solid and if the team can rebuild trust and manage rewards more transparently in the future, Eclipse could bounce back, but for now the airdrop remains a shadow over what should have been a strong launch.

littlemonkey 👾 · 1289· 1y ago · negative9

“Good Tech and Bad Execution”The concept of SVM was so good but their tap tap game intentions and bad attitude with the community took everything from them, they will be act as an example how with good tech you also remain humble with the community and have gratitude for Them, Otherwise every project will face Eclipse faith

Astro Polo · 1275· 1y ago · negative9

“Traitor to its community”This project betray to its community and become dust chain

Nichoqu · 1337· 1y ago · negative9

“Eclipse: The Thread Is Long, the Technology Is Still a Discussion”Every week there's a new thread: they say the modular revolution, they say GSVM will shake the world. But so far? The testnet is still missing, the coding repo is minimal, and the UI bridge is nowhere to be seen. Billions in transactions? Hundreds of thousands in wallets? That's amazing... if we believe numbers without proof. $ES token listed, immediately plummeting -46%. A big narrative, the market gives it a reality check. Honestly, Eclipse is currently more suited to being a crypto influencer than a blockchain project. They're building image, not infrastructure. If this project were a tweet race, it would definitely win. But when it comes to building a chain? It's still warming up.

KIRI · 1267· 1y ago · negative9

“Combining the best of solana and ethereum Eclipse is design in such a way dat allows for solana-level performance on eth”

gafaru · 1188· 1y ago9

“La importancia de la comunidad”A propuesta de Ethos he decidido valorar este perfil y a teniendo en cuenta la baja puntuacion actual todo indica que es una red flag. No puedo hablar con pruebas feacientes, pero vistos los comentarios de muchos usuarios a los cuales sigo y en los que confio, veo que el proyecto no hizo lo que prometió y eso me lleva a reflexionar... ¿los proyectos nos manipulan? ¿toman decisiones teniendo en cuenta la comunidad? ¿Solo piesan en ellos? Creo que culaquier pooyecto y sus usuarios deberian tener muy claro esto.

0xcryptocat · 1300· 10mo ago · negative13

‹ Back360 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›