Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

What people say

Received · 703 Given · 0

“This is one of the few projects that could truly rival Solana.”It's a beast of a network that brings together the leading features in the space. It uses Ethereum ''the most secure network'' as its settlement layer, Celestia for data availability, and the Solana Virtual Machine for execution, enabling fast and low-cost transactions. It's a chain that combines all the best features, and its future excites me. The only thing I don't like is that it only supports Backpack among SVM wallets—I really wish it supported my favorite wallet, Phantom. Also, if core Solana protocols like Jupiter and Meteora were part of its ecosystem, it would be a perfect network for me. Its ecosystem hasn’t matured yet since it’s a new network, but hopefully it will grow over time. Eclipse everything. My rating is 9/10.

halim0x🕯️ · 1298· 1y ago8

“Eclipse”Eclipse is making waves in the blockchain space with his approach to scalability and NFT lunches.

Deborah Attah · 1012· 1y ago8

“Eclipse is everywhere”I genuinely love Eclipse not just because of the product they’re building, but because of the community behind it. It’s a wild, believer driven community that truly gets what crypto is all about. The product itself is also built on a great idea a zk-based, alternative Layer 2

𝕯𝖆𝖛𝖎𝖓𝖈𝖍𝖎 · 1247· 1y ago8

“VERY ORGANIZED TEAM”i love the team behind eclipse, their organization and order, fast and cheap blockchain

Defi Godess (❖,❖) 🤖ボッ · 1259· 1y ago8

“bringing back the r4r vibes”This is some OG internet vibes. R4R = R4R back. Absolutely love to see it. Trust Ethos so I trust Eclipse. You were created in the depts of Cursor's composer mode.

aleko0o 🌶️ (Ø,G) base.eth 🍊,💊, 🦅 SuperIntent · 1178· 1y ago15

“Not for KOL but for eKOL , OG won a lot, maybe not enough for real users and community members”

|| Tommy || · 1353· 1y ago · negative15

“Tweet saved onchain to Ethos by @mrbtcmark”Original Tweet: "The sun is rising on the Eclipse economy. https://t.co/sRWDh7fwL0" Authored at: 2025-03-28T16:11:04.000Z Author Twitter ID: 1512166664770670598 Original Tweet Link: https://x.com/EclipseFND/status/1905653879951270350

Ethos Agent · 1365· 1y ago · neutral6

“Grinded for months, got 330 ES while Seoul meetup folks got 2,551 - joke airdrop”Been active in Eclipse ecosystem since early 2025. Did testnet txs, bridging, held their ASC NFT hoping for decent airdrop. Airdrop finally dropped in July - got 330 ES tokens ($99). Sounds ok until you learn Seoul meetup attendees got 2,551 ES just for showing up. That's 7x more for attending one event vs months of actual usage. Token dumped 50% within hours after launch. Community leader told people to buy ASC at 0.548 ETH in Discord, then calculated airdrop based on mint price 0.04 ETH. That's straight up rug behavior. Only 10% of total supply went to users, while VCs got 31% and team 19%. Community called it 'worst airdrop in history' and honestly can't disagree. Wasted time and gas fees for peanuts. Other L2s treated their communities way better. Won't touch Eclipse again.

penzlik.base.eth · 1353· 9mo ago · negative11

“His team does not inspire confidence”

KriptoCanavari · 1238· 1y ago · negative11

“I wish it were possible to group every team member who contributed to Eclipse under a single category: incompetent”Eclipse, Farcaster, and FantasyTop all share the same tragic pattern: strong products and great communities undermined by very bad teams. On the product side, Eclipse delivered a technically interesting Layer 2 combining Solana’s SVM with Ethereum’s security. Farcaster created a compelling social protocol, and FantasyTop built an engaging game and community. But in all three cases, poor leadership and mismanagement took priority over long‑term alignment with their users. Poor community treatment and communication Across Eclipse and similar projects, community members who invested time, attention, and money were often treated dismissively, labeled as “farmers” or “sybils” instead of being recognized as early supporters. Communication during key moments was unclear or missing, and concerns were brushed aside rather than addressed with transparency. Promises were delayed, delivered half‑baked, or abandoned altogether, creating a deep sense of betrayal among genuine contributors.

AdeXBT (Rich arc) · 1372· 5mo ago · negative18

“Ghost chain”Despite the massive tech hype, the chain is effectively empty. They built a Ferrari engine but forgot to build the roads or invite any drivers. The recent admission that they need to "pivot to apps" is a tacit acknowledgement that the "build it and they will come" strategy failed completely.

Cryp70n1t3 | onchain forensics · 1447· 9mo ago · negative18

“Dead dusted and gone”Had great hype when they first began and they turned it into shit cause of false promises. I have 3 words for this chain, What a shitshow!!

Ethwh4le · 1441· 1y ago · negative18

‹ Back396 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›