MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓264Tradeclioagent.eth↑64.8%jesse.base.eth↑30.2%Sk0rp.eth↑15.3%BlindSquirrel↑7.8%VouchesCorey0001 📉 📈10 WHUF → ChescoCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethSamZ5 WHUF → SafZ🫎 Scaply .ink .sand3 WHUF → AndrewDReviewsWildcallnegative · 58 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 58 upvotessibzbnegative · 39 upvoteschosta.ethpositive · 28 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@EclipseFNDOn Ethos
Eclipse

Eclipse

704 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 704 reviews· Influence factor 90, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 204 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is widely characterized as a failed Layer 2 project that betrayed its community through unfair token distribution, broken promises, and poor execution. Early supporters—including NFT holders and active testnet participants—report feeling scammed after the TGE resulted in token price collapse, inadequate airdrops, and mass layoffs. The team faced criticism for toxic leadership, dismissive treatment of community members (labeling them as farmers and sybils), and a shift from long-term vision to short-term value extraction. The chain remains largely abandoned with minimal TVL and user activity, while leadership controversies—including allegations against founder Neel Somani—further eroded trust.

“Innovative SVM Layer 2 with Strong Technical Vision but Mixed Community Reception”The project presents a compelling technical proposition as Ethereum's first SVM Layer 2, combining Solana's parallel execution capabilities with Ethereum's security guarantees. The modular architecture utilizing Celestia for data availability represents genuine innovation in the Layer 2 space, achieving impressive performance metrics with over 6,000 TPS and significantly lower fees than traditional EVM rollups. The technical team has demonstrated competence in shipping a functional mainnet with over 60 dApps deployed, showing that the core infrastructure works as intended and can attract developer interest across DeFi, gaming, and consumer applications. However, Eclipse faces notable challenges in community management and ecosystem development that temper the technical achievements. Multiple reviews highlight concerns about leadership decisions, particularly regarding community communication and airdrop distribution strategies that have alienated some early supporters. The dApp ecosystem, while growing, still lacks the depth and quality found on more established Layer 2 solutions, with several users noting that many applications feel incomplete or poorly executed. Additionally, the project's approach to community building through initiatives like Turbo Tap has created division, with some viewing it as innovative engagement while others see it as prioritizing gamification over genuine ecosystem development. Eclipse's future success will likely depend on addressing these community concerns while continuing to leverage its technical advantages. The 74% positive review rate from 227 reviews indicates a polarized reception, suggesting that while the project has strong believers, it also faces legitimate criticism that needs attention. The upcoming token generation event and continued ecosystem development will be crucial tests of whether Eclipse can translate its technical innovation into sustainable adoption and community satisfaction. For potential users and developers, Eclipse offers genuine technical benefits but comes with the caveat of an evolving governance structure and community dynamics that may impact long term stability.bluelotus99.base.eth 🍀💫 · 1311· 1y ago · neutral5
‹ Back516 of 704 · most upvoted firstMore ›