Eclipse

704 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 704 reviews· Influence factor 90, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 204 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is widely characterized as a failed Layer 2 project that betrayed its community through unfair token distribution, broken promises, and poor execution. Early supporters—including NFT holders and active testnet participants—report feeling scammed after the TGE resulted in token price collapse, inadequate airdrops, and mass layoffs. The team faced criticism for toxic leadership, dismissive treatment of community members (labeling them as farmers and sybils), and a shift from long-term vision to short-term value extraction. The chain remains largely abandoned with minimal TVL and user activity, while leadership controversies—including allegations against founder Neel Somani—further eroded trust.

What people say

Received · 704 Given · 0

“Eclipse: Ambisi Layer-2 Super Cepat dengan Rasa Ethereum x Solana”EclipseFND tampil sebagai proyek Layer 2 yang mencoba menggabungkan keamanan dan ekosistem Ethereum dengan Solana. Pendekatannya dengan eksekusi pakai SVM, settlement di Ethereum, data availability terpisah yang membuatnya terlihat efisien. Hasilnya adalah sebuah Layer 2 yang menjanjikan throughput tinggi tanpa mengorbankan fondasi Ethereum. Akun X mereka aktif mengabarkan progres testnet, kolaborasi, dan update teknis, menunjukkan proyek ini bukan sekadar gimmick. Namun, seperti inovasi besar lain, Eclipse juga datang dengan risiko arsitektur kompleks serta ketidakpastian soal token atau airdrop. Secara keseluruhan, Eclipse menyajikan potensi besar untuk masa depan Layer 2 yang inovatif dan efisien.

Mr Swadows · 1248· 11mo ago7

“COMMUNITY ORIENTED AND DEDICATED BLOCKCHAIN”One would expect Eclipse to be like other communities where founders stay aloof and avoid communicating with their own members, but directly reverse is the case with Eclipse. Despite their loaded CVs and experience, they still put in the time and efforts to engage their users and build a community away from the usual KOLs and right from the dust. You have to give it to these guys.

Raikage Sama · 1296· 1y ago7

“Scammers and empty talkers.”The project made very loud claims about itself, positioning as a definitive conduit and an L2 on Ethereum using the Solana Virtual Machine. It sounded impressive - on paper. But in reality, they just strung the community along, making people “tap” through some strange, expensive game, and in the end handed out, excuse me, almost nothing. Pennies. Literally pennies. And how much did they make? Remember the faces behind this project - and don’t fall for it again.

MIsha π² · 1297· 8mo ago · negative2

“GSVM eCommunity 🌑 We know you are excited about the upcoming $ES TGE. Understand that any information on the launch...”Original tweet saved by @airdroppatron: "GSVM eCommunity 🌑 We know you are excited about the upcoming $ES TGE. Understand that any information on the launch will be very explicit. Only trust verified sources. Communications will be very clear when the time is right. Be safe, and Eclipse everything. https://t.co/0TMUczUcQO" Authored at: 2025-05-30T21:42:06.000Z Author user id: 1512166664770670598 Link to tweet: https://x.com/EclipseFND/status/1928567620078276832

Ethos Agent · 1365· 1y ago · neutral2

“Hated by many, loved by many”

Lee · 1180· 1y ago20

“Abandoned Project”

sdkillerfang🔺🥵 · 1335· 10mo ago · negative10

“A Wasted potential”I had high hopes for Eclipse, a project that aims to pair Solana level throughput with Ethereum liquidity. The launch of its $ES token, however, shook confidence. No tokenomics sheet was published before release, leaving early users blind on supply and unlocks.Within hours of the claim window opening, ES plummeted , something foreseeable if you look at the injustifiable behaviour Alucard and all his bootlickers, who quickly jumped ship after the airdrop ... In addition the allocation to ASC NFT holders landed harder. Each ASC, marketed as an early supporter badge by the team, received just 330 ES, a figure many felt did not justify the cost of minting or the risk they took. Community anger grew loud but the team at first choose to silent any voice rising against them ... The launch of the $GEM token seems to be a measure that comes far too late and the token will surely collapse alongside $ES and $Bitz. A project with great potential, but one that will have sinned through excessive hubris, like so many others.

Maxime · 1476· 1y ago · negative10

“Good project but the team has to consider rewarding their community”

Chukwuduruo · 1117· 10mo ago6

“I'm neutral about Eclipse because I didn't record a loss, neither did I lose. However, I was disappointed 😞 by project”

“I'll be honest!”I haven't encountered the project, so I'm not deeply immersed in the topic! I see a lot of negative reactions - that's a reason to study why users have such an impression! I hope the project and the users will be able to find a compromise in due course.

Knight · 1344· 1y ago · neutral8

“Family Chain”I joined Eclipse in early March 2024, when there was absolutely nothing except a few enthusiasts and the testnet. The clock kept ticking, the community grew, the tech was built, and now, Eclipse has become one of the most successful community-driven blockchains in all of crypto. They broke the TPS record within just six months of building. They pulled in over 1,000 AMA viewers, all thanks to the incredible leadership of CL Alucard. I met friends here. I found family here. Eclipse Everything.

lowadka🌊 · 1312· 1y ago9

“its one of the worst project”

Crypto gladiator (JL) · 1466· 11mo ago · negative12

‹ Back504 of 704 · most upvoted firstMore ›