MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓263TradeDonald J. Trump↓13.3%Bold↑1.7%Itsakm8↑2.6%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%VouchesAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethCole West8 WHUF → zypherxbtCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethstellarobject5 WHUF → 0xGeeGeeReviewsPendlepositive · 86 upvotesAnton Boiarchukpositive · 67 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 54 upvotesWildcallnegative · 46 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@Ethereum_MaxisOn Ethos
Ethereum Maxis

Ethereum Maxis

485 reviews, 14% of them positive.14% positive · 485 reviews· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 11 activities · Mar 2026

Known for misleading followers and taking advantage of community trust, resulting in significant financial losses—including over $1M defrauded through an NFT mint. Rebranded multiple times while maintaining the same pattern of broken promises, manipulation, and deception. Deletes critical comments and has publicly admitted to lying for personal gain.

“[Anon review] Bad coms”Before I say anything, just know this is coming from an ASC holder. I didn’t mint ASC during the official drop. I picked mine up from the secondary market when the community was still forming. At that time, it felt like something real was building. The Eclipse team was actively supporting ASC, the main Eclipse account was engaging, and with the airdrop on the horizon, the energy in both Discords was high. It felt organic and genuinely fun. Being part of the ASC community came with real perks too. Early whitelist access for Eclipse ecosystem mints, boosts in the Tap Tap game, ecosystem point bonuses, and more. It really felt like ASC and Eclipse were aligned. But as we got closer to the Eclipse TGE, the messaging started to shift. First there was the post telling people to delist ASC from marketplaces. Then it was “don’t buy ASC for the airdrop,” followed by “ASC will be rewarded.” That kind of flip-flopping isn’t great communication. To be honest, a big part of why I bought ASC was for airdrop exposure. I'm not spending $800 to $900 worth of ETH on some JPEGs just for fun. I also put skin in the game by LPing in multiple Eclipse eco projects and participating in Tap Tap. What really worries me now is the fear that holders like me might end up getting sidelined, while insiders and the team walk away with the biggest share of the airdrop. I hope I'm proven wrong, but right now, that’s how it feels.Kairos Agent · 1273· 1y ago · negative16
“A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: A Threat to Eclipse and the Crypto Community”1. Exploiting the Trust of the ASC and Nata Army Communities Alucard gained the trust of loyal holders, only to use their support for personal gain. He showed no commitment to the people who stood by him only to himself. 2. Lack of Transparency in Eclipse Airdrop Distribution As the community lead for Eclipse, he openly admitted using a private leaderboard and manual selection methods. The result was a vague, biased, and unaccountable process that left many confused and disappointed. 3. Harsh Reactions to the Simplest Criticism When I posted a lighthearted and polite comment thanking Eclipse for excluding me from the airdrop, he immediately blocked me. That overreaction speaks volumes he can’t even handle the mildest form of critique. 4. Systematic Silencing of the ASC Community For a long time, he kept watch over anyone using ASC related NFTs as their profile pictures, assuming they might be critical. Instead of fostering dialogue, he mocked, labeled, and silenced any voice that didn’t align with his narrative. 5. Disrespect for the Community, No Personal Integrity Alucard showed no consistent values or principles. He lacked both self respect and respect for the community he claimed to lead. In the end, his attitude caused real damage to the reputation of Eclipse. Final Thoughts: Alucard wasn’t a leader or an inspiration just a self serving individual who used the community for his own agenda. Ultimately, he harmed Eclipse from within more than any outside threat ever could.🌈0xexel ☕️ · 1304· 1y ago · negative11
‹ Back420 of 485 · most upvoted firstMore ›