MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓263TradeDonald J. Trump↓13.3%Bold↑1.7%Itsakm8↑2.6%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%VouchesAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethCole West8 WHUF → zypherxbtCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethstellarobject5 WHUF → 0xGeeGeeReviewsPendlepositive · 87 upvotesAnton Boiarchukpositive · 67 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 56 upvotesWildcallnegative · 46 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@Ethereum_MaxisOn Ethos
Ethereum Maxis

Ethereum Maxis

485 reviews, 14% of them positive.14% positive · 485 reviews· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 11 activities · Mar 2026

Known for misleading followers and taking advantage of community trust, resulting in significant financial losses—including over $1M defrauded through an NFT mint. Rebranded multiple times while maintaining the same pattern of broken promises, manipulation, and deception. Deletes critical comments and has publicly admitted to lying for personal gain.

“The Hype Architect Who Hollowed Out Promises”Alucard presents himself as a champion of community, but the real story reveals a systematic exploitation of trust. Instead of welcoming support, he built a positional hierarchy—offering “exclusive” whitelist spots, invite-only airdrops, and alpha campaigns that sidelined long-time contributors in favor of his inner circle. The account’s rhetoric centers on fairness and participation—but the outcome is exclusion. Long-term supporters who backed Eclipse from the beginning report being brushed aside when token claim opportunities appeared. Meanwhile, insiders and allies received early access and private rounds, despite vows that “any community contribution would be valued” . The chronic disappointment of loyal contributors makes the message feel less like vision, and more like selective payoff. His communication style compounds the problem. When critics raise concerns, he shifts the language—framing dissent as a lack of dedication or branding naysayers as outside the community while claiming that “strong community voices” are rewarded. That gatekeeping rhetoric masks opaque decision-making and reinforces hierarchy over meaningful inclusion . Even the tokenomics feel engineered. The token giveaway tactics—such as free BITZ distributions tied to 10-day airdrop schemes—appear promotional but have exacerbated sell-offs and inflation fears in the broader community, raising concerns about manipulation over genuine utility . Alucard isn’t building an open ecosystem—he’s staging it. He builds narratives around belief and participation, but delivers exclusivity and insider privilege. If you're drawn to vision wrapped in community talk, Alucard’s style may look promising. But if you value transparency and genuine inclusion, this account is a cautionary tale in selective visibility and scams hidden behind community rhetoric.argonstark.eth · 1288· 1y ago · negative9
‹ Back432 of 485 · most upvoted firstMore ›