Profile· Untrusted@FortuneDungeons On Ethos

Dungeons of Fortune

247 reviews, 37% of them positive.37% positive · 247 reviews· Influence factor 50, above 10% of accounts

The record

From 109 activities · Apr 2026

Dungeons of Fortune is a Web3 dungeon-crawler game that raised millions in April 2025 but abandoned the project shortly after launch, with the team going silent and no updates since late April. The token and NFT prices collapsed dramatically within 24 hours, and the project is widely characterized as a rug pull that left investors and players with significant losses. While a small minority praise the game's concept and mechanics, the overwhelming consensus describes broken promises, aggressive pay-to-win monetization, lack of transparency, and complete absence of communication or roadmap delivery.

What people say

Received · 247 Given · 0

“Neutral because it's a GameFi”I have had terrible experiences with GameFis. Lost money most recently to immortal rising so I have a negative bias towards GameFi projects. Also, I think the web3 space is now more than just GameFi. It is more into AI and agentic projects. This impacts my voting which is basically to sit on the fence on GameFi projects until I see something positive happening in that region of Web3

Medico · 1285· 1y ago · neutral12

“Dungeons”Dungeons initially appeared to have good potential within the community, but over time several challenges have become clear. Their level of commitment has been inconsistent, with periods of activity followed by long stretches of absence, making it difficult to rely on them for consistent contributions. Communication has also been a weak point, as they are often unresponsive or slow to engage, which disrupts collaboration and affects the flow of projects. While they do bring some ideas to the table, they often lack follow-through, leaving tasks incomplete or without the necessary depth of effort. This creates an impression of unreliability and reduces the overall confidence others can place in them. Professionalism and accountability are also areas that need significant improvement, as consistent participation, initiative, and responsibility are crucial in a community setting. I believe [Name] has room to grow and could improve if they put more focus on discipline, communication, and reliability, but at this stage, their shortcomings outweigh their contributions.

PeaceMaker · 1291· 1y ago · negative17

“A failed hope”Came with so much energy and hope, pushed by KOLs as the next possible onchain hero creating a bubble around the NFT and token that has disappeared into oblivion at the expense of the community who chooses to believe.

Bejosetale · 1236· 7mo ago · negative9

“Scam”They collected a large sum of money and disappeared. There was no information about them on Twitter, I do not recommend contacting them

MG-CRYPTO · 1106· 1y ago · negative9

“Unos sinverguenzas”Son un equipo de ruggers, lanzaron un juego y no ha durado ni las 24 horas del día, lo han sacado todo a la velocidad de la luz, unos caraduras. Siento mucho la gente que habrá caido. Además parece que estan mirando de sacar otro juego, tened mucho cuidado con esta gente.

Gami · 1318· 1y ago · negative9

“not properly executed game”

Gambit · 1174· 1y ago · negative9

“A Bold and Promising GameFi Experience”Dungeons of Fortune left a strong impression on me as a project that balances creativity with functionality. In my view, this isn't just another blockchain game it’s a carefully designed experience that respects players' time and rewards their effort. The visuals are clean, the mechanics are intuitive, and the overall flow of the platform feels smooth and user-centric.

MunchMunch · 1257· 1y ago9

“地牢探索與經濟機制的遊戲”該遊戲目前正處於最終地牢測試階段，採用了一個遊戲引擎來模擬每個地牢，玩家的選擇、裝備和策略將影響遊戲結果。遊戲內建有一個數學模型驅動的經濟系統，確保玩家的收益（或損失）與其承擔的風險成正比，旨在避免玩家花費大量時間卻僅獲得微薄回報的情況，例如「花費 5 小時只贏得 8 美元」。

xbb · 1213· 1y ago9

“Rug”This felt like it had a lot of thought and effort put into it, but the initial phase did not go well and instead of trying to fix it, the devs disappeared. Both frustrating and disappointing to see potential go to waste by some poorly aligned devs.

Onchain Chemist · 1324· 1y ago · negative9

“revieww”The handle @FortuneDungeons suggests a connection to either a gaming project (likely in the crypto or DeFi space, given the context of "DeFi Dungeons") or a board game community (as hinted by the "Dungeon of Fortune" Reddit post). Let’s break this down: Likely Focus of @FortuneDungeons DeFi Dungeons Connection (Crypto Gaming): The web results describe DeFi Dungeons as a crypto game developed by Longwood Labs, featuring a fantasy RPG experience in the "Nightvale Valley." Players can choose from three hero classes (Warrior, Mage, Marksman), level up their Combat Level, and improve stats like Power, Vitality, Fortune, and Luck to tackle dungeons and raids. The "Fortune" in @FortuneDungeons aligns with the stat mentioned in DeFi Dungeons (Fortune affects rewards in the game), suggesting this X account could be the official handle for DeFi Dungeons or a related fan account. Given the crypto/DeFi context in the X posts about @union_build , it’s plausible that @FortuneDungeons focuses on this game. If this is the official account, it likely posts updates about gameplay, tokenomics (e.g., in-game rewards or NFTs), new features (like the three initial games mentioned in the Dragons Den Casino and Arcade), and community events. For example, they might announce new dungeon releases or token airdrops, especially since the game’s design emphasizes a "scalable and replayable gameplay loop."

mister00 · 1277· 1y ago · neutral9

“very boring game inactive long ago”

0x0072...D916 · 1160· 11mo ago · negative11

“Very additive and fun to play”This game is quite similar to the popular Dungeons and Dragons game. It is highly addictive and gives you an immersive experience. Highly recommend

IkeBillion.eth · 1175· 1y ago11

‹ Back108 of 247 · most upvoted firstMore ›