MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281Majdi↓266Tradevitalik.eth↑1.2%Brandon scott↑2.9%Ethos↑1.0%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsCoinbase Ventures 🛡️positive · 85 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 73 upvotes一川drive 🔴positive · 33 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 29 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@HumanityprotOn Ethos
Humanity

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748Given · 0
“Rugbull”After a lot of anticipation and effort, I'm honestly left feeling disappointed and betrayed by Humanity Protocol. I followed this project from the beginning, believing in its vision of a human-centric identity in Web3. I, along with many others, dedicated countless hours to completing missions, participating in events, and taking on roles like "Human Support" to help build the community. We gave our time, and some even gave their biometric data, all under the impression that our genuine contributions would be valued. Instead, we watched as the project's promises of fairness and transparency fell apart. The airdrop campaign was unclear and seemed designed to reward insiders, influencers, and stakers rather than the early supporters and active community members who put in the real work. It feels like our efforts were used to create hype for the project, only to have us discarded when it was time for the rewards to be distributed.Rick Coin Doctor · 1512· 1y ago · negative32
“a disguised scam”KELLY · 1266· 9mo ago · negative10
“Fraudulent”This protocol does not provide anything that is beneficial to the space. I would personally avoid this project at all costs.happynft · 1336· 9mo ago · negative10
“Humanity protocol”Humanity Protocol is redefining digital identity with a clear mission and strong vision. Focusing on proof of humanity and privacy first verification they’re building strong values for more fair, trustless and a human centered web.Cryptochemist · 1265· 9mo ago10
“Pure scam”I participated and farmed more then one year and many farmers like me farmed this but this project decide airdrop less then 0.5% of total community.DevDua.eth · 1214· 10mo ago · negative10
“Scam”The project is a scam projectCheta Of All Trade · 1277· 10mo ago · negative10
“too many promises not enough clarity”I tried to follow Humanityprot and understand the core idea but the more I read the more abstract everything felt a lot of big concepts are mentioned but they’re rarely broken down in a concrete or practical way which makes it hard to really grasp what’s being built the communication feels more like vision statements than actual progress updates and that gap between ambition and clarity left me feeling unconvinced rather than inspiredlove_for_man87 Ⓜ️Ⓜ️Т · 1191· 10mo ago · negative10
“Against humanity”Humanity protocol was one the projects that neglected it's community Asked us for our data and illegally sold it on dark web Then they made a lot of us ineligible Yappers were not even in spared I hope they get arrestedAsta.kennedy 🖤🐈‍⬛ · 1245· 10mo ago · negative10
“Bad Project”I should never have used their testnet; I gave away my KYC information. I feel scammed.Seb 🇵🇪 · 1268· 10mo ago · negative10
“Absolutely negative”The Humanity project united a large community of people active in the crypto world around its idea. Who supported the project and helped it develop. I was an active member of the Discord community. Because I liked the project's concept—personal identification when needed. For several months, we attended AMAs and listened to the team talk about the project's enormous potential, how much they loved their community, and what their ideas and plans were. We went through personal identification several times and actively supported the project on social media. Butwhen the project decided to thank the community, they did it in the most dishonest and vile way possible—they forced participants to re-register on a resource that wasn't working or was working poorly, setting a deadline of just a few hours. Naturally, a huge number of people couldn't do it, including me. Thus, the project team secured a great drop for themselves and left the community behind. We're now seeing the consequences—the project is practically nonexistent. Investors' money has been wasted.minister555🍊,💊 · 1320· 11mo ago · negative10
“Fundraising and the project's utter failure”He promised a lot under the guise of providing human verification, and after collecting a large number of identities, I believe he exploited them for something unethical.wardean · 1267· 11mo ago · negative10
“Humanity is trash”base.ethZetarium (❖,❖) (WOW 🟣).sand · 1166· 11mo ago · negative10
‹ Back276 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›