Profile· Untrusted@Humanityprot On Ethos

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748 Given · 0

“Why doesn't the FBI investigate the financial crimes he committed?”I spent the entire day writing negative reviews about projects that behave like scams, and Humanity is no exception. No airdrop! What have they been doing besides interacting with the community, making promises to everyone, and then outright lying? Who did they give the airdrop to? Yes, to themselves, and this is clearly visible on the blockchain. ( they gave almost 60% of the airdrop to themselves, the rest to the community, but that's negligible ) Some guy from Ukraine wrote a great post on Telegram explaining why they can't be trusted at all, and I was shocked when I learned the whole story.. What can I say: they successfully wiped their feet on investors and the community. scammrs. <3

kiriruwu · 1276· 1y ago · negative10

“H”They simply collected biometric data from hands and it is not clear where they will be used.

chupokabra | Renaiss 𒀭 · 1213· 1y ago · negative10

“bad project doing crime szn”my frenz are ambassador and many of them didn't get any appreciation from humanity protocol team, i also as early supporter feel being left out. one of the worst project like DOP and many other worse one in 2022-2025 project. hoping this gonna be another harsh lesson to user, not to put blind faith anymore.

Finball · 1306· 1y ago · negative10

“Worst project came like a scam in the community”In crypto, if the founders/projects can't manage their airdrop effectively & ditching the early/testnet users, die soon after launch. Prime examples are Scroll, ZKSync. This project let everyone down & completely worst in the management.

letsinvest.eth · 1233· 1y ago · negative10

“Red flags and zero credibility”This account projects a formal and cautious personality but in practice it lacks authenticity. It presents itself as a protocol without showing the people behind it. No clear team, no attestations and no trusted partnerships are visible. The engagement is low, with little activity or meaningful community interaction. That makes it hard to believe this account is serious or trustworthy. The choice of name makes it sound official, yet there is nothing to back it up. This mismatch between presentation and substance is a red flag. Many scam accounts use the same strategy, hiding behind professional branding while avoiding transparency. They went live on mainnet recently which left many of their users dissatisfied... I really think they are a bunch of scam hiding under a formal name

megumi · 1253· 1y ago · negative10

“airdrop”humanity protocol is the worst project in blockchain. because in web3 there is no way for kyc and human passport. blockchain should be fully decentralize not be centralize and control by someone else. aside this humanity protocol distributes bad airdrop for its loyal community.

DAOldrich · 1385· 1y ago · negative10

“TeamScam”This project turned out straight up clown vibes. Folks dropped time, effort, even their biometrics - and in the end? Nada. Rewards went to randoms, not the real grinders. Team acted like the community didn’t even exist. Humanity? More like "Rugmanity."

Tonni · 1307· 1y ago · negative10

“transparency and technology issues”I recently had the opportunity to explore Humanity Protocol, and I must say, my experience was far from positive. Despite its ambitious goals of creating a decentralized system for social good, several issues have raised serious concerns about its viability and effectiveness. Firstly, the project lacks transparency. There is insufficient information about the team behind Humanity Protocol, their qualifications, and their track record in the blockchain space. This anonymity breeds skepticism and makes it difficult to trust their intentions and capabilities. Secondly, the technology itself appears to be underdeveloped. Many users have reported bugs and glitches that hinder functionality, leading to a frustrating experience. Additionally, the platform's user interface is not intuitive, making it challenging for newcomers to navigate. Moreover, the community engagement is lacking. There seems to be minimal interaction from the developers, which raises questions about their commitment to the project and its users. Many community members feel unheard and undervalued, leading to a sense of disillusionment. Furthermore, the project's marketing strategies seem overly aggressive and often misleading. Promises of high returns and rapid adoption have not materialized, leaving many investors feeling duped. The lack of clear communication about project milestones only adds to the frustration. Finally, there are concerns about the long-term sustainability of Humanity Protocol. Without a solid business model or clear roadmap, it’s hard to see how this project can maintain its momentum or deliver on its promises in the future. In conclusion, while Humanity Protocol may have noble intentions, its execution leaves much to be desired. The combination of transparency issues, technological shortcomings, poor community engagement, questionable marketing tactics, and sustainability concerns makes it a project that I cannot recommend at this time. Potential investors and users should proceed with caution

ionelan.g · 1310· 1y ago · negative10

“Users Data were sold”I am not gonna talk about the "fairdrop" where organic users gave their data freely from day one and received nothing. What I want to mention is the research done by @MadVincent666. The Humanity sold all the users data, for 600M usdc. Nice work guys for milking the community

Sep D. Tem ( for the peonta arc ) 🎒 · 1234· 1y ago · negative10

“Scammer who sold ur data”This hummanity running by scammer team, they took ur data for airdrop lmao, im always think web 3 no need people data cause everything onchain but so many stupid people sold their data only for Dust. Seen on CT someone make a thread, dev was a scammer in the past, and people still fell, yall need to learn yall data worth more than $ even yall data worth more than $BTC.

T Scottey · 1239· 1y ago · negative10

“umanity Protocol Makes Trust Feel Simple (and Secure)”Humanity Protocol is tackling one of the biggest challenges in Web3—proving you’re human without giving up your privacy. I really like how they focus on trust and identity in a way that feels user-friendly, instead of complicated. It’s an ambitious project, but the idea of making the internet safer and more human is something we definitely need.

Pritom π² · 1185· 1y ago10

“Concerns About Humanity Protocol”While Humanity Protocol entered the scene with bold promises of decentralization and biometric identity innovation, its execution has raised serious doubts. The project’s communication has been vague, and many community members feel left in the dark about key developments. Despite claiming to empower users, its tokenomics and governance structure seem to favor early insiders. Price volatility and unclear utility have further eroded trust. For a protocol that claims to represent “humanity,” its lack of transparency and meaningful engagement with its community feels ironically inhuman.

Tony Gabry · 1225· 1y ago · negative10

‹ Back288 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›