Profile· Questionable@Incentiv_net On Ethos

Incentiv

7 reviews, 29% of them positive.29% positive · 7 reviews· Influence factor 20, above 4% of accounts

The record

From 6 activities · May 2026

Incentiv faces significant skepticism regarding founder background and fundraising practices, with multiple reviewers citing connections to prior failed projects like DOP and concerns about undisclosed or manipulated funding rounds. One supporter praises the "Every Action Counts" philosophy for rewarding activity over capital, though critics question whether the heavy reliance on incentives attracts genuine product adoption or primarily reward farming.

What people say

Received · 7 Given · 0

“shady project”I would advise anyone not to invest time and money in this project, some of the founders have been involved in rugs and shady projects in the past. please dyor guys.

Negus · 1242· 1y ago · negative15

“i wouldnt advice because the founder is very questionable. he was involved in a scheme with DOP. be careful”

Kacey.ip · 1301· 1y ago · negative8

“I'm one of those who likes it.”I’ve been in crypto for four years now, and honestly — I’ve seen dozens of so-called “revolutionary” blockchains come and go. But Incentiv truly stands out because it doesn’t just talk about “mass adoption” — it actually focuses on the user. First off, their philosophy — “Every Action Counts” — is brilliant. They don’t just reward capital like most projects do; they reward activity and contribution to the network. That’s something crypto has been missing for a long time — encouraging not only investors but also real users who actually push the ecosystem forward. Second, usability. Incentiv has made simplicity a priority — with Account Abstraction, a single gas token, and the ability to bundle multiple actions into one transaction. It’s genuinely convenient, especially if you’re tired of endless confirmations and constant network switching. Another thing I really like is their community-driven growth. Instead of relying on flashy marketing, they’re building from the ground up — already attracting millions of users in the testnet through engaging tasks, fair rewards, and genuine participation. Sure, it’s still early stage, and of course, it’s worth keeping an eye on how they roll out the mainnet and tokenomics — but the potential is seriously strong. Incentiv feels like the kind of project that could become that long-awaited “smooth entry point into Web3” for the masses everyone’s been talking about.

Artem · 1250· 1y ago3

“why iam convinced $CENT / @Incentiv_net is likely an SKM style project : i might be wrong, but after observing the p...”> why iam convinced $CENT / @Incentiv_net is likely an SKM style project : > > i might be wrong, but after observing the project closely, several concerns caught my attention > > 🚩 1. > > No clear evidence of traditional fundraising from reputable VCs or institutional investors > Instead, they reportedly raised around $28M through $ CENT pre-sale > > 🚩 2. > > weak community support system > i opened a support ticket on their Discord server. it has been almost 3 days, and the issue is still unresolved. 3 different moderators responded at different times, but none provided a clear solution > after asking a question, moderators often disappear, and i had to tag them again in general chat to get attention. the ticket remains open with no proper follow-up or accountability > > 🚩 3. > > some moderators seem to be engaging in irrelevant discussions (sports, casual chats) instead of focusing on project-related topics > > 🚩 4. > > ambassador program structure > the project is recruiting a large number of ambassadors, and currently anyone can join without experience or clear responsibilities > > there is no monthly compensation; participants are only earning Discord points, with promises of possible rewards in the future > > these are just observations from my experience > > Always DYOR X post saved by: [@Salmanph9](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/Salmanph9) Authored at: 2026-03-16T06:35:30.000Z Author user id: 1768546724493361152 Link to tweet: [link](https://x.com/Foyeajuddinovi/status/2033431948639494642)

Ethos Agent · 1365· 6mo ago · negative1

“Scam project (same founder dop + same fake raised funds strategy)”Incentiv is a big scam, the founder/team is from dop and they used the same pattern, let me explain, with DOP they "raised" 20M but that raised was fake (no info about this sale on Gems) + after that they decide make 20+ private sale with ref link, meanwhile launching a testnet campaign with ref link for kols, after the testnet they launched another sale, they launched a poll for asking if they want a pre-sale for testnet users, but the site of the poll was manipulate (the site was created by dop team), after everything they launching the TGE, and the price at TGE was -90% from pre-sale, after dop the founder launched Incentiv a new L1, same pattern, they launched a testnet with ref + they announcing a fake 28M raised funds with the same platform (Gems), so they follow the same playbook, but instead a privacy token, they launching a L1 (because in that period L1 was hyped), be away from this scam i see they paid also some kols for shilling this scam.

Boku · 1235· 9mo ago · negative1

“Incentiv”Incentiv ( @Incentiv_net ) is a Layer 1 blockchain focused on simplifying Web3 with features like Account Abstraction for easy wallet recovery, a Unified Token for streamlined transactions, and the Incentiv Bundle for efficient actions. It rewards users, developers, and operators while supporting sustainability efforts. Built for Ethereum-based dApps, it uses DAO Proof of Authority for low-cost, high-performance operations. It’s user-friendly and innovative but may trade some decentralization for efficiency—overall, a promising project if it delivers on its vision.

azile · 1235· 1y ago2

“I wanted to like Incentiv, but something just doesn’t feel right.”Everything sounds good on paper — simple onboarding, rewards for everyone, better UX. But in reality, it feels like the focus is more on incentives than actual value. When a system relies heavily on rewards, you start to question: are people here for the product… or just farming? That gap is hard to ignore.

Waizh · 1150· 6mo ago · negative0

7 of 7 · most upvoted first