Profile· Questionable@NaoXprotocol On Ethos

NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain

3 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 3 reviews· Influence factor 11, above 2% of accounts

What people say

“What Turned Me Off Naoris Protocol”I went into my research on Naoris Protocol with a fair bit of curiosity, but the deeper I dug, the shakier it looked. 1. Big promises, fuzzy details The website is stacked with phrases like “Decentralised Trust Mesh” and “post-quantum security,” yet I had to hunt for any concrete technical docs or open-source code that could back those claims. Buzzwords alone don’t inspire confidence. 2. Moving targets on the roadmap Every time I check, the mainnet seems to live in “coming soon” territory. If there is a public testnet or an independent audit in sight, it is well hidden. Slippery timelines usually mean the tech is nowhere near ready. 3. Token allocation that tilts toward insiders From what I can see, only a sliver of the supply is available to the public at launch, while the lion’s share sits with the team, investors, and a vague “treasury”. That setup makes me wary of price swings and insider dominance. 4. Security talk with little proof For something that markets itself as a security layer for the entire internet, I expected a stack of third-party audits, transparent bug-bounty payouts, and clear threat models. Instead, I found a handful of marketing slides and a bug bounty that feels tiny next to the value they claim to protect. 5. Metrics that feel padded Headline numbers like “millions of wallets” do not mean much when scripts can inflate activity. Without raw on-chain data or a published methodology, I have no way to tell signal from noise. 6. Polished updates, shallow answers The community channels sound upbeat, but when people ask pointed questions about code releases, token unlocks, or audit results, replies get vague fast. That style sets off alarm bells for me. Bottom line Right now Naoris Protocol reads more like marketing than a finished product. Until I see audited code, a real testnet, clear tokenomics, and honest adoption stats, I am going to keep my distance. If they eventually deliver, great, I will happily revisit. For now, it is a firm pass.

MrJudge · 1177· 1y ago · negative22

“Scamming Testers”They initially started testnet phase as incentivised only for testers to find out days to TGE that they will not be rewarded for running ad testing the nodes that rewards will be provided on mainnet which has no specific date at the moment Also ran a scam giveaway of 30k $NAORIS which no one probably got, such a scammy project should have ignored them from the beginning.

Doorknob.eth · 1237· 1y ago · negative7

“Naoris Protocol: innovation or just empty promises?”I want to share my experience with Naoris Protocol. Honestly, my feelings are really mixed... At first, the project looked super exciting: decentralized cybersecurity, post-quantum protection, all these fancy words about "a new layer of the internet" and a bright future. I was honestly inspired by the idea of the browser node - just surf the web while your device becomes part of a global defense system. Sounds amazing, right? But reality was very different. I joined their testnet back in January, installed the extension, farmed points, invited friends. Everywhere they promised that points would convert into NAORIS tokens at TGE. And guess what happened? The token launched, it's already trading... but for us, the actual testers, they simply said "Wait until Q4 2025". Like, seriously? People supported their testnet for months, and in return we only got promises. Technically, it's not a scam - the project is alive, they raised $31M, and keep announcing partnerships. But the truth is, it feels like we were used as free testers and hype generators, while the team cashed in first.

Fly Pinkish · 1254· 1y ago · negative5

3 of 3 · most upvoted first