Vladimir son-of-a-snitch 💎

2 reviews, 100% of them positive.100% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · Jul 2026

Vladimir is a talented Telegram bot developer known for quickly grasping product ideas and shipping polished, working solutions. He built @Starsfather_bot, which continues running smoothly, delivering features exactly as envisioned with meticulous attention to detail and edge cases.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 4

“Thoughtful Contributor with Real Impact”One of the people who subtly improves the quality of every community they are a part of is Mihail. Although he doesn't have the loudest voice in the room, he is unquestionably one of the most important. Discussions quickly move from conjecture to substance when Mihail joins a discussion. Whether it's about future ecosystem changes, protocol incentives, or tokenomics design, he makes connections that others miss. Mihail's ability to balance curiosity and discipline is what most impresses me about him. He analyzes hype rather than jumping on it. He frequently conducts his own product testing and provides both technical and user-focused feedback. His advice appeals to both developers and regular users because of its balance of accuracy and usability. His remarks are given more weight because he also possesses a unique sense of timing, understanding when to speak and when to listen. Mihail's presence adds structure, calm and clarity to the chaotic Web3 environment. Instead of pursuing followers, he is establishing knowledge and credibility, which is precisely the kind of basis that any robust cryptocurrency community requires.

on Mihail Pochekai · 1432· 12mo ago32

“A Great Connection”I've known Benss for over a year now. Our relationship began when he was looking for someone to help him create a Telegram bot, a task for which I had the necessary skills. Since then, we've kept in constant contact. Through our conversations, it became clear that he is an incredibly intelligent and knowledgeable person. Benss made a huge contribution to my understanding and immersion in the world of cryptocurrency. With his help, I learned where I could invest my money, and he even loaned me significant sums of money on my word alone, despite the fact that we have never met in person. I consider myself very fortunate to have crossed paths with such a person.

on Benss.base.eth · 1588· 1y ago20

“Builder Who Actually Ships”Serhii is one of those rare people in Web3 who talks less and builds more. While others are still debating approaches, Serhii is already testing his third iteration. He has that maker mentality - constantly experimenting, refining, and pushing things forward without getting stuck in analysis paralysis. What immediately stands out is his technical depth combined with practical execution. Serhii doesn't just understand how protocols work - he knows how to make them work for real use cases. Whether it's smart contract optimization, API integrations, or automation workflows, he approaches problems with both precision and creativity. He's also genuinely collaborative. When Serhii shares insights or feedback, it comes from hands-on experience, not theory. He's the kind of contributor who elevates the technical bar of any project or community he touches. In an ecosystem full of talkers, Serhii is a doer - and that makes all the difference.

on Serhii Volkov · 1341· 12mo ago7

“Why i'm out”Listen, I gave Anoma a fair shake. The intent-based story line sounded intriguing and with $60+ million in venture capital backing, I was hopeful they’d actually produce something real. But after seeing how the airdrop unfolded at the end of Septemeber, I’m out. The token dump was obvious So XAN was listed on Binance Alpha, Kraken, Bybit and Gate on September 29th. Within 24 hours, it dropped nearly 60% from $0.24 cents to $0.11. And honestly, anyone who was paying attention knew it was coming from a mile away. They have unlocked 10% of total supply at launch. One billion tokens hit the market all at once. All these airshippers who got free tokens had no incentive to hold them. No skin in the game means no loyalty. They simply waited for the listing, dumped all of their tokens and moved on to the next farm for more free tokens. The futures market told the whole story before any of it even happened. Open Interest was down 24% immediately after the listing and funding rates went negative — that means more people were going short than long. The smart money was short this before retail even woke up. Same playbook, different name What really bothers me is this — ZachXBT did a whole thread outing the fact that co-founder Christopher Goes allegedly employed the same exact tactics with his last effort, Agoric. Agoric raised an $88 million round from the same VCs — Polychain, Electric Capital, the usual suspects. They promised ATOM airdrops and revolutionary JavaScript smart contracts. Then the token launched, instantaneously the price tanked and the community got essentially nothing. Now we are seeing the same exact emergence in Anoma. Same founder, same investors, same hype cycle, same disappointing outcome for the average individual. The VCs got their allocation at better terms, setters got early entry, while retail got the scraps which immediately lost 60% of their value.

on Anoma · 549· 1y ago · negative7

4 of 4 · most upvoted first