Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Sk0rp.eth
Ethos
vitalik.eth
jeff.hl
Tucosalamanca
Dpuck (bob)
MMatt
Anton Boiarchuk
Tbeagle ⨀
Bboat
Rahulxero.hlProfile· Questionable@OrangeHare_ioOn Ethos
OrangeHare
1 review, not positive.0% positive · 1 review· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accountsWhat people say
Received · 1Given · 0“serial NFT rugcore slop deployer, weekly liquidity extraction”Randomly noticed a "featured" collection on the OS frontpage. And then I looked closer... This deployer has two addresses: OrangeHare_Network https://opensea.io/OrangeHare_Network/created 0x7fd2bb95699d4df935b7a544840928d46532159f This one has 16 collections (!!!) that somehow ended up as OpenSea featured mints. Their previous address, Orangehare-Official, has deployed 50 (!!!) collections: https://opensea.io/Orangehare-Official/created 0xb28077284a81b23bf4709ac326accb8142662cff Their discord is dead, but they do mention AI generating WEEKLY collections out of a single artwork (which most likely is also AI). This is a mass deployer who drops weekly rugcore AI slop. Basically doing a weekly liquidity extraction. For some reason, the 16 collections they dropped from one wallet were all featured on the OS main page. Opensea FAQ mentions a "high standard of quality" for featured drops - but apparently it doesn't apply to this specific deployer. This is not even "not doing proper due diligence", because you can notice it's absolutely awful AI slop on a quick glance. It took less than a minute to notice that they deployed 50 collections on their other wallet. HOW did this deployer manage to constantly be approved as a "featured drop"? It's far from the "high standard of quality" Opensea claims is required to become a curated "featured drop" they promote on their frontpage. I recommend staying away from anything deployed by "OrangeHare".
Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°) · 1460· 7mo ago · negative19
Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°) · 1460· 7mo ago · negative191 of 1 · most upvoted first