Profile· Established@PacmanBlur On Ethos

Pacman | Blur + Blast

160 reviews, 44% of them positive.44% positive · 160 reviews· Influence factor 200, above 39% of accounts

The record

From 8 activities · May 2026

Built noteworthy projects including Blur and Blast that initially showed promise and pushed the industry forward, but both suffered from poor execution and mismanagement post-launch. Blast in particular disappointed users with ghosting after the TGE, undelivered promises to builders, abandoned ecosystem projects, and prolonged communication silence before eventual shutdown. Created conflicts of interest by running both Blur and Blast simultaneously with separate investor bases while tokens remained publicly traded.

What people say

Received · 160 Given · 0

“Innovator”Great builder and fantastic with creating incentive structures. Was able to pivot following Blur with the direction the NFT interest was dipping. Masterclass in captivating attention on Blast but lacked the founder presence for the community side until many participants had already left the ecosystem. The mobile app seemed promising but interest has wained, but hopeful a long-term solution will emerge that gains traction.

0xSammy · 2195· 1y ago · neutral17

“A Tale of Two Projects”I was an early investor in Blur, and they delivered,building a top notch NFT trading platform, rewarding liquidity providers, and launching a solid points program. Blast, on the other hand, felt rushed and distracted the team from Blur, causing missed opportunities in areas like ordinals and runes, which Magic Eden capitalized on. As someone who supported Blur early, I was hoping for a similar chance to get involved in Blast, but that didn’t happen. While Blast introduced interesting mechanics like native yield and gas refunds, it ultimately feels like both projects lost focus, and I can’t help but feel slightly left out.

elina · 1169· 1y ago · neutral16

“It takes one wrong move to destroy a legacy”Pacman did good with Blur but destroyed his "reputation" with blast.

JPEGG · 1374· 1y ago · neutral16

“Neutral Feelings about Pacman”On the one side great dev with large experience. On the other very bad communicator and low transparency. His last tweet is from May, from there he is silent and so on with his both projects (Blur, Blast). I have mixed feelings about Pacman

0xDeepmouse · 1483· 1y ago · neutral19

“Great Builder”i respect pacman for building blur and blast, i enjoyed using blur and their drop was one of the best in the space. respect

King.sol 🇶🇦 · 1154· 1y ago15

“It was all a Blur”Look, love him or hate him, Pacman pushed the boundaries and seriously shook up the NFT game with Blur. From then on, Blur season 2,3,4,69 and following that with Blast I think we can say man made a bag but forgot where his priorities sat. My opinion anyway. If he does something in the future, based on his track record I won't hesitate to try be apart because at least we know this man can market the shit outta things.

𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚚𝟸𝚠𝚊𝚍𝚎 · 1645· 1y ago · neutral15

“In Pacman we trusted until Blast happened”

Sethi · 1274· 1y ago · negative15

“blast还不错”虽然blur把我割了，blast也有种种问题，比如跨链费用，如果在一年前我可能会狠狠给上一个差评，但现在看来可能要求过高了，也许未来我会给个好评。当然，卖高价t恤衫真的绷不住。

孤鹤.hl · 1820· 1y ago · neutral18

“Disappointing Experience with Pacman | Blur Blast””I had high expectations for the Pacman | Blur + Blast project, but unfortunately, it didn’t deliver. The execution felt rushed, communication was inconsistent, and many of the promised features were either incomplete or poorly implemented. During the drops, the process was confusing and disorganized, leading to missed opportunities and frustration. What was most disappointing is the lack of transparency and support. Questions in the community often went unanswered, and it felt like the team wasn’t prepared to handle real engagement or provide meaningful guidance. Overall, the project had potential, but the lack of planning, execution, and communication significantly undermined the experience. Verdict: Needs major improvements in execution, transparency, and community support before it can be recommended.

Nastassia Larsen · 1295· 1y ago · negative17

“He's a builder who has a clear idea for the future of his products even if it's a future that the users don't want.”Perhaps we just don't see the forest for the trees but a mobile chain (blast) seems to be where pacman believes that we are headed.

Chesco · 1512· 1y ago17

“pacman - pacman”On one hand, I respect this man so much. On the other, I feel like he didn't build the community the way I expected him too. As someone who launched a collection on his chain, a single acknowledgement of that would've went a long way.

tut™ · 1562· 1y ago · neutral13

“The creator”I dont know why he got alot negative review cuz he is one of the greatest creator of all time he invented the blur who definetly dominates opensea for ethereum nfts then he created blast and he gained insane hype on the chain , he developed new chain with great new specs so even he didnt resume the hype on blast he is deff a great creator

UMANN · 1333· 1y ago12

‹ Back84 of 160 · most upvoted firstMore ›