MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374aadvark↓2630xSammy↓253Mitsuo↓249Tradevitalik.eth↑43.1%Anton Boiarchuk↑9.6%Biti8↑3.2%Cuzzo 🛡️↓4.2%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsJeetupositive · 82 upvotesjeff.hlpositive · 47 upvotesDegen Ape Traderpositive · 42 upvotesaikendrum.ethpositive · 31 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@PerleLabsOn Ethos
Perle Labs

Perle Labs

77 reviews, 8% of them positive.8% positive · 77 reviews· Influence factor 38, above 7% of accounts

The record

From 77 activities · Apr 2026

Perle Labs (formerly Kiva AI) is widely characterized as an exploitative project that farmed users for months through gas-fee-dependent tasks, badge minting, and data labeling while promising airdrop rewards. The majority of participants—reportedly 80–90%—were marked ineligible at the checker stage without clear criteria or explanation, despite completing all requirements and paying significant SOL fees. Users report the project raised $17.5 million but distributed less than $350k in actual airdrop value (0.23% of promised 7%), extracted $30k in claiming fees, and maintained poor communication and lack of transparency throughout. A small minority of positive reviews praise the technical vision around on-chain privacy and AI infrastructure, but these are vastly outweighed by accusations of community exploitation, data theft, insider favoritism in role distribution, and deliberate bait-and-switch tactics.

“Scammer devs”Projects like this gradually erode the positive reputation of Web 3. 0 by exploiting the very principles that make decentralized ecosystems attractive in the first place. Instead of building genuine value, these teams harvest community data, social‑media engagement, and token‑sale hype, then pivot to schemes that siphon off funds or lock users into unfulfillable promises. The result is a leech‑like behavior: they cling to the trust and enthusiasm of early adopters, only to dump their credibility onto the ground together with the community’s hard‑earned goodwill. When such tactics become commonplace, the overall perception of Web 3 shifts from a frontier of innovation to a minefield of scams, making investors especially those who trade in AUD and other fiat‑on‑ramps more reluctant to participate. This hesitancy slows down genuine projects, hampers legitimate token launches, and raises regulatory scrutiny, all because the ecosystem’s signal‑to‑noise ratio is crowded by bad actors. If developers and founders continue down this path, the network’s collective security both technical and reputational will be compromised, and the community will bear the brunt of the fallout, seeing their funds diminish and their trust eroded. In short, these opportunistic projects have no place in Web 3; their existence undermines the core promise of decentralization, transparency, and community‑driven value creation, and the only sustainable remedy is a concerted effort from honest builders, vigilant users, and platform custodians to expose, discourage, and ultimately eliminate such malicious behavior.Raia Renaiss · 1263· 6mo ago · negative5
‹ Back60 of 77 · most upvoted firstMore ›