Profile· Questionable@Rivalz_AI On Ethos

Rivalz Network

8 reviews, 25% of them positive.25% positive · 8 reviews· Influence factor 39, above 8% of accounts

What people say

“卖节点, 割韭菜, 反撸垃圾项目”伪装成 AI 概念的 Depin 项目, 实际售卖节点 400 U 一个, TGE 后暴露本性, 买节点的全部亏麻了, 还要缓慢解锁参与测试网挂机的用户全部被反撸, 消耗 CPU 资源挂了个寂寞挂机 3 个月, 空投给 1 u, 恶心人 ! TGE 时散户的空投解锁一拖再拖, 项目方自己先出货, 币价上线小所后一跌再跌 ! 垃圾项目 !

逸星web3 · 1262· 1y ago · negative15

“Six Months In, Nothing To Show”I ran a node for this project for over six months and ended up with 500 tokens - at today’s prices that’s under one dollar, which doesn’t come close to covering the time, setup, and maintenance involved. The messaging around incentives set expectations that simply didn’t match the realized payout, especially for small, non-institutional operators. Operationally, the node ran fine, but the reward structure felt misaligned with the effort required. If the economics don’t improve clearer accrual, better base rates, and more transparent projections - it’s hard to recommend this to anyone who values their time.

Володимир Вагилевич (Ø,G) π² · 1432· 1y ago · negative5

“Negative Experience with the Rivalz Network Project”My journey with Rivalz Network was, without a doubt, the worst experience I’ve ever had in the Web3 universe. From the beginning, the project showed total disregard for those who believed in and invested in its proposal, especially those who bought nodes during the pre-sale. Many people, including myself, put in around 400 dollars per node hoping for a return that would at least match the risk. What we received was just a loss: the token’s value collapsed after the TGE, while token releases for regular investors were extremely slow. Meanwhile, the team was already moving and selling their own coins, showing clear signs of bad faith. In addition, Rivalz Network totally harmed those who provided GPUs to run nodes during the testnet. Many dedicated time, money, and hardware resources, betting that extra effort would bring a fair reward in the airdrop. The result was the opposite: active participants ended up practically “rugged,” receiving crumbs or absolutely nothing in return. There were frequent reports of people who spent months running nodes and received ridiculous rewards, sometimes not even corresponding to a single dollar. The project promised a lot and delivered little. It was sold as an innovative initiative integrating DePIN and AI, but ended up limited to just talk. They constantly stalled on delivering functionalities, delayed airdrop releases, failed to meet deadlines, and only increased the frustration and sense of scam among the community. After launching on exchanges, the token only suffered more declines, reflecting the lack of investor confidence. In summary: Rivalz Network harmed early buyers, exploited those who provided resources for the testnet, failed to fulfill commitments, and brought only loss and frustration to the community. I would not recommend anyone getting involved or trusting this project, my experience was totally negative and serves as a warning to others who may come next.

Bordel · 1259· 1y ago · negative4

“Rivalz: My Experience & A Warning”Tried Rivalz for real: ran a node for months, paid for VPS, got nothing Bought a zNode during node sale for $495, 9+ months later it earned me $2 Spent another $200 on their AI agents in Rome activity Zero return. Cool vision maybe, but in practice it’s been pure disappointment

Frost · 1261· 1y ago · negative4

“A Project That Promised Too Much”I had high hopes for this project Rivalz_AI since it was presented as a serious DePIN idea with a lot of potential. Unfortunately the reality turned out very different. The whole process dragged on for a long time and in the end it felt like everyone was left disappointed and basically scammed. What frustrates me most is that the trust and excitement people had was wasted. It is a clear reminder to always be careful with projects that promise too much.

Tonni · 1307· 1y ago · negative4

“Big Disappointment”People trusted the project and ran nodes - spent a lot of money on storage, but TGE was really disappointing - the RIZ price dropped a lot due to wrong listings and people who participated in the testnet couldn't even cover their costs. It was a big fiasco that the team continued almost as if nothing had happened.

Uzman · 1317· 1y ago · negative4

“Gema oculta?”A pesar del desastroso inicio que tuvo, por mas que la quema de nodos no funciono y que realmente no hay nada de nuevo en la red mas que el hecho de hacer stake a un % razonable, a pesar de todo eso aun confio en la tecnologia que pregona, tiene un gran chance de revivir si ya saca su red operativa y se despega de Base.

LaCriptizaX | base.eth✨🐐🛡️💚🌙 · 1220· 12mo ago3

“''made agents system for crypto''”I know the project made mistakes during the TGE, and even I lost $450 because of it. But I still believe in it. Why? Because the project is still active and improving day by day. A bad TGE doesn’t mean the project itself is bad.

deepu · 1265· 1y ago3

8 of 8 · most upvoted first