Starknet

430 reviews, 19% of them positive.19% positive · 430 reviews· Influence factor 98, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 44 activities · Apr 2026

Starknet is a ZK-rollup with solid technology—STARK proofs, Cairo language, low fees, and account abstraction—but faces severe community backlash centered on its airdrop distribution. The snapshot criteria excluded active users who lacked ETH balance despite using the network, and dismissive team communication (notably calling community members "e-beggars") fractured trust. Post-TGE, the token price collapsed dramatically, user activity dried up, and the project is widely perceived as having prioritized insiders over genuine supporters, leaving it labeled a "ghost chain" despite its technical merit.

What people say

Received · 430 Given · 0

“Other than the airdrop back then, what are some new things happening on Stark?”

0x10CF...4161 · 1217· 1y ago · negative9

“Terrible Ecosystem”This is definitely the worst ecosystem integration I've seen. Very poor community support. I wasted my time and resources on this ecosystem, with nothing to show for it.

sHoLLy · 1275· 1y ago · negative9

“Sự minh bạch của Starknet chưa rõ ràng”Việc airdrop STRK gây nhiều sự chỉ trích: không công bằng, không minh bạch, thiếu cho người dùng thực sự tương tác.

Thuận Nguyễn Minh · 1234· 1y ago · negative9

“Lacks Communication Skills”This project qualified persons for their Airdrops based on having eth Balance on their chain and not Assets Balance.. Even after all the stress. we were put in while using their platform.. There was no incentives for being early on their chain.. They do not know how to communicate clear terms and conditions to the community... Good Tech, Bad Community management skills....

Elaris · 1266· 1y ago · negative9

“Unclear Token Utility”The STARK token’s utility is still vague, and its limited circulation, coupled with perceived unfair airdrop distribution, has drawn criticism from the community.

pdzeng | 熊貓 · 1302· 1y ago · negative9

“过去一年整，被反撸时刻历历在目，更难受的是二级接盘回本遥遥无期，纯垃圾中的战斗机～”

web3黑奴 · 1319· 1y ago · negative9

“SCAM”Starknet is all talk and no delivery. The tech isn’t ready, the community feels abandoned, and the airdrop was a joke. If this is the future of Ethereum scaling, it’s a bleak one.

TΞΞJAY👻 · 1303· 1y ago · negative9

“L2 chain”Looking back, there’s one project I deeply regret ever getting involved in. At the time, it seemed like it had potential, or at least enough promise to be worth my energy. But as things unfolded, it became painfully clear just how disorganized, aimless, and ultimately pointless the entire effort was. No clear direction, poor communication, and a complete lack of follow through everything that could go wrong, did.

Ifeanyi · 1332· 1y ago · negative9

“Fumbled the loyalty play”I used Starknet when no one was watching, bridged, LP’d, tested dApps, only to get nothing when it mattered. They left early users out in the cold while rewarding wallets that barely touched the chain. The worst part wasn’t just the exclusion, it was the silence: no clarity, no accountability. It’s hard to trust a network that preaches decentralization but forgets the people who helped build it.

Donalds · 1301· 1y ago · negative9

“Another useless Eth L2. Farmed their users and supporters. I don't know what people would even use this for.”A bad use of funds and time. No surprise they are now struggling to get any users. Nothing more to say

Grinko · 1226· 1y ago · negative9

“Starknet's official community incentive is the most failed case.”Starknet's official community incentive is the most failed case. @Starknet ECMP asked everyone to submit their own contribution links, but the forms were not connected to the Twitter API, and Twitter was not verified. The review team could not distinguish between true and false, so many scammers used other people's contribution content to fill in the application form. My contribution content and that of many early contributors were overwritten by someone else's submission. I immediately reported the authenticity verification vulnerability of this form to the administrator of the Starknet official community, but the Starknet ECMP review team (person in charge: Henri) turned a blind eye and did not take any remedial measures. It is really a failed web3 project.

skyman 🦇 · 1289· 1y ago · negative9

“'Bad actors'”Starknet made it seem like they cared about the community, engaged people and ended up disappointing the people who supported them from day one.

Bob · 1343· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back168 of 430 · most upvoted firstMore ›