MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281aadvark↓263TradeAnton Boiarchuk↑2.5%vitalik.eth↑5.8%Biti8↑3.2%Cuzzo 🛡️↓4.2%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsjeff.hlpositive · 84 upvotesDegen Ape Traderpositive · 58 upvotesCoinbase Ventures 🛡️positive · 55 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 54 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@StarknetOn Ethos
Starknet

Starknet

430 reviews, 19% of them positive.19% positive · 430 reviews· Influence factor 98, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 44 activities · Apr 2026

Starknet is a ZK-rollup with solid technology—STARK proofs, Cairo language, low fees, and account abstraction—but faces severe community backlash centered on its airdrop distribution. The snapshot criteria excluded active users who lacked ETH balance despite using the network, and dismissive team communication (notably calling community members "e-beggars") fractured trust. Post-TGE, the token price collapsed dramatically, user activity dried up, and the project is widely perceived as having prioritized insiders over genuine supporters, leaving it labeled a "ghost chain" despite its technical merit.

“A Ghostly Chain with an Airdrop That Burned Trust”The ethos of Starknet’s online presence is a letdown, hyping itself as a cutting-edge Layer-2 solution for Ethereum but stumbling into a reputation as a lifeless “ghost chain” that’s left its community bitter. Positioned as a ZK-Rollup built on STARK technology, Starknet boasts big ideas like scalability and low-cost transactions, but the reality feels like a mirage. Users widely criticize its February 2024 airdrop of 700 million STRK tokens as a disaster—kermonat called it “incorrectly distributed,” noting heavy protocol users got nothing despite thousands invested, while Shishir42069 gave it a scathing 3/10, echoing the community’s frustration over unfair allocations. Starknet’s communication style is cold and overly technical, rattling off stats like 2.8-second block times or partnerships with Wormhole, but sidestepping the growing anger over its failures. The airdrop, meant to reward users, developers, and Ethereum stakers, sparked outrage with claims of manipulation and opaque criteria, as sendmoodz pointed out major errors that left dedicated users empty-handed. The ecosystem itself feels abandoned—0xToluu and DegenDaa called it “dead,” slamming its weak marketing and lack of user activity compared to competitors like Base or zkSync. Starknet’s ethos comes off as a hollow promise, alienating its community with a botched airdrop and a chain that’s struggling to stay relevant.Jay.Base.Eth · 1246· 1y ago · negative8
“you distroiyd my hope”monamani.eth · 1191· 1y ago8
‹ Back216 of 430 · most upvoted firstMore ›