Profile· Untrusted@StarknetOn Ethos

Starknet
430 reviews, 19% of them positive.19% positive · 430 reviews· Influence factor 98, above 19% of accountsThe record
From 44 activities · Apr 2026Starknet is a ZK-rollup with solid technology—STARK proofs, Cairo language, low fees, and account abstraction—but faces severe community backlash centered on its airdrop distribution. The snapshot criteria excluded active users who lacked ETH balance despite using the network, and dismissive team communication (notably calling community members "e-beggars") fractured trust. Post-TGE, the token price collapsed dramatically, user activity dried up, and the project is widely perceived as having prioritized insiders over genuine supporters, leaving it labeled a "ghost chain" despite its technical merit.
What people say
Received · 430Given · 0“What’s Going On With Starknet?”Lately, Starknet has been going through a rough patch, and the community isn’t too happy about it. The first big problem came with the Starknet airdrop. They decided that only wallets holding at least 0.005 ETH (before Nov 15, 2023) would get rewards. For many people who were active on the network but didn’t keep that much ETH, it felt really unfair. Because of this, a lot of users just walked away. In fact, the daily active users crashed from more than 220k users to about 84k in just one week. That's a huge drop. Then there were technical issues. For example: The system didn’t properly check contract addresses. So, if someone accidentally sent tokens to a wrong or invalid address, the money basically got lost forever. During a past upgrade, users had to update their accounts to get access to their own funds. The ones who didn’t update on time got locked out. Around $550k worth of assets was stuck until Starknet later reopened the process. All this has created frustration in the community. It shows that no matter how good the tech is, if the team doesn’t communicate clearly and add strong safety measures, users lose trust really fast.
Ajeet Jhurawat · 1240· 1y ago · negative8
Ajeet Jhurawat · 1240· 1y ago · negative8““Starknet Disappoints””Tried Starknet early, but the experience was frustrating. The platform is confusing for new users, token distribution felt unfair, and community support is weak. The hype doesn’t match reality.
bytevoid · 1290· 1y ago · negative8
bytevoid · 1290· 1y ago · negative8“Exploiting users through oversized monthly unlock withdrawals”this project turned out to be all hype with no delivery. instead of building, they dumped liquidity straight on the community, which killed trust and pushed players away. they launched with an inflated fdv and added weird requirements like forcing users to hold 0.01 eth at snapshot. in the end, the setup feels like it was designed to exploit users with massive monthly unlocks rather than create real value.
glaze · 1330· 1y ago · negative8
glaze · 1330· 1y ago · negative8“Starknet làm mình thất vọng quá”Thật tiếc cho Starknet: nền tảng kỹ thuật thì ấn tượng, nhưng cách phân phối token lại đẩy người dùng thật ra ngoài. Blockchain không chỉ là code, mà còn là niềm tin. Khi niềm tin gãy, adoption khó mà bền.
00K · 1221· 1y ago · negative8
00K · 1221· 1y ago · negative8“Total disaster”The project received the maximum at the beginning of the journey, the support of Vitalik Buterin, the entire crypto community, top funds and influencers. Thanks to the absolutely incompetent and dishonest leadership, the team aimed at earning money at the expense of the community, eventually turned into a vile meme and lost everything! Die die die starknet
Fed'ka · 1479· 1y ago · negative8
Fed'ka · 1479· 1y ago · negative8“โปรเจคที่กินเวลา กินเงินของฉัน”Starknet เป็นเป็นเจคที่ฉันใช้เวลา ใช้เงินลงแรงไปเพื่อทดลองระบบ แต่สิ่งที่ได้รับตอบแทนมาคือมูลค่า0 การพัฒยาตอนนี้ดูเหมือนจะไม่มีอะไรน่าดึงดูดให้กลับไปใช้อีก บอกได้อย่างเดียวมันจบแล้วสำหรับฉัน
Karn-is Bored👹 · 1360· 11mo ago · negative10
Karn-is Bored👹 · 1360· 11mo ago · negative10“No community = Ghost Chain”They had a lot of promise initially with a lot of investments, New tech and Developers flocking into the ecosystem but the turning point was the airdrop distribution. They were stubborn and decided to stick with the Devs and ignored the community. They even openly called the community memebers E-Beggars. After that the rest is history. I went there for the airdrop and received it as well but there was just nothing else to do there later on no active and happy participants. After that I never touched starknet and bridged everything out.
degend.eth · 1267· 11mo ago · negative10
degend.eth · 1267· 11mo ago · negative10“Farmed community”Starknet came with a proposal to be a different blockchain. I used for over a year, spent hundreds dollars in fees, and in the end I received 0 airdrop. Meanwhile a lot of influencers got full budget. They just farmed VC and community money.
0xManoel · 1299· 11mo ago · negative10
0xManoel · 1299· 11mo ago · negative10“Scam Chain”แม้จะได้ทุนมากมาย และคิดว่าเทคของตัวเองดีแค่ไหน แต่ทีมกลับพูดเหยียดหยามผู้อื่น โดยเฉพาะ User ไม่เคยฟังชุมชนจนกลายเป็นเชนร้างที่แทบไม่มีใครนึกถึง แต่ตอนนี้กลับมาบอกว่า "We listened" อาจจะเพิ่งรู้ตัว แต่มันก็สายเกิน ถือเป็นบทเรียนครั้งสำคัญ ถ้าไม่ให้ความสำคัญต่อ User ก็คงจบไม่ดีเท่าไหร่
BlackShark .base 🐉 · 1357· 12mo ago · negative10
BlackShark .base 🐉 · 1357· 12mo ago · negative10“Not a good chain with bad management”I've been keeping an eye on Starknet for a while and while my experience with chain activity lately has been underwhelming. There was a significant surge of users during the token-airdrop hype, but then things dropped off hard many dApps feel quiet, transaction volume seems low compared with its earlier peaks isn’t matching the everyday user feel.
fantasytale | (❖,❖) · 1251· 12mo ago · negative10
fantasytale | (❖,❖) · 1251· 12mo ago · negative10“total garbage”I was pretty active on Starknet early on, but their airdrop distribution left me disappointed. It now down over 87%, it’s a rough spot for holder and the community, hopefully the team turns it around soon but I doubt it.
ThreeEyedOracle · 1307· 1y ago · negative10
ThreeEyedOracle · 1307· 1y ago · negative10“Bullish on the tech, but the team lacks clarity”Last year, I was very bullish on the team to the point that I bought their token using a portion of my margin as a form of support for the technology they were building. However, in mid-2024, I sold all the allocation I had accumulated in this token, so I no longer hold any share of it. The reason I sold my entire position was because I didn’t see progress in the technology and fundamentals, which led me to make the decision to sell everything. But at the moment, I remain neutral in observing this project.
0xknowledge · 1271· 1y ago · neutral6
0xknowledge · 1271· 1y ago · neutral6
Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Sk0rp.eth
Ethos
vitalik.eth
jeff.hl
Tucosalamanca
Dpuck (bob)
MMatt
Anton Boiarchuk
Tbeagle ⨀
Bboat
Rahulxero.hl