Profile· Questionable@assisterr On Ethos

assisterr

14 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 14 reviews· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accounts

What people say

“To add to my negative review from last week.”Today was TGE, where it was promised to launch a checker and Claim, as it turned out paid only to users of Binance Alpha, I dare to assume as a payment for listing and inflating the price, prentensiya never opened, the price collapsed, the team ignores the community, does not give any comments, after a long wait some people had a button, but most of the drop was already 0, also a loophole was found, the Claim, which as you can see in the screenshot ( https://imgur.com/vLlUH7z )has had consequences. Uncompetent, a team that does not respect its community, I think the reputation should be downgraded !

Aalexxx · 1328· 1y ago · negative13

“Menyesal pernah mengenal mereka”Saya hampir lupa untuk mereview satu projek sialan ini. Terlalu banyak gimik dan keburukan dari eksekusi yang mereka lakukan. Dari mulai menjual NFT untuk mendapatkan role dan juga proses pemberian reward yang tidak transparan. Saya masih ingat betul, saat portal claim dibuka, terjadi bug. Sehingga ada orang yang bisa mengklaim berkali-kali.

koalarajin · 1319· 8mo ago · negative11

“"18$"”The first thing that comes to mind is “fraud.” I would like to share my opinion about the team and the project as a whole. It's no secret that in order to get a role in most projects, you need to work hard and improve your skills. It was quite difficult, but we managed to do it with the guys. We also created content, art, and memes. We constantly supported the project. An assister is someone who helps. That is, at the moment, anyone can create one. All you need is a little experience. It's no different from other projects. But when TGE was released, the team blocked the “stamp” so that coins could be withdrawn and sold on the exchange. It was impossible to withdraw funds for a whole day. While the team was dumping coins, we waited) My drop was $18. Isn't that fraud?

Bit Jame · 1312· 1y ago · negative11

“Not a competent team”Following the recent announcement about the upcoming drop, raised many doubts about the team's intentions. -They refuse to provide specific selection criteria. -During the campaign, they started selling NFTs that increase your final drop by a large % - Dubious "verification" of the wallet, where it was necessary to send $5 to some address. Now the big picture: If a person who was not eligible according to secret criteria passed a dubious verification, then he automatically becomes "eligible", despite the fact that he does not pass the unclear criteria, that gives the impression of some kind of sale of allocation for a drop))) Questionable and unfair attitude towards users

Aalexxx · 1328· 1y ago · negative11

“Terrible treatment of the community and project ambassadors.”I'll tell you my story of working for this project! I worked for them for over a year, initially as an ambassador, then as a senior ambassador! I worked diligently, periodically posting on various social networks (Lense, LinkedIn, Twitter, Telegram), maintaining chats, and answering community questions. The result of this work was a ridiculous and crappy drop for the community (pennies), and your drop was bugged. Ambassadors weren't given anything for their work. Some ambassadors (including me) bought junk NFTs for over 1.5 SOL. At the moment, the team has simply withdrawn, and more than three exchangers are simply not responding to questions.

ASS 🇺🇦 | .ink 🐐 π² · 1445· 1y ago · negative10

“total disappointment”after a lot of time and daily check in and mint some nfts.. wtf that drop man it was soo disappointment for all community

basgaan · 1250· 1y ago · negative10

“Bad TGE execution and abandoning community”Prefer to gives Binance alpha users a fat allocation rather than their own community and contributor worse, they let Binance alpha users claim and sell their airdrop while community still can't claim their allocation yet. Bad execution, greedy team, L

ziuuu · 1255· 1y ago · negative10

“Bad TGE and no loyal for community”@assisterr has drawn significant backlash from its community due to its poorly executed Token Generation Event (TGE), which has left many supporters feeling betrayed and undervalued. The airdrop distribution was widely criticized as unfair, with reports of disproportionate allocations favoring insiders or large holders while leaving smaller community members with minimal rewards. The vesting schedule, particularly the controversial 90% vesting at TGE for certain parties, has been labeled as exploitative and dismissive of loyal supporters who expected more equitable treatment. Furthermore, @assisterr lack of clear communication and transparency throughout the process has only deepened the community frustration. Many feel that the project has prioritized short-term gains over fostering long term loyalty, eroding trust and alienating the very community that helped build its initial momentum.

Raftr · 1282· 1y ago · negative12

“Lack of Transparency & Overpromised AI”Asisster has been a disappointment so far. The project lacks transparency regarding tokenomics, the technology feels slow, and the AI hype doesn't truly reflect the actual use of AI. Overall, there's a clear gap between the narrative and the execution, making it difficult to build trust in the project.

zakkk_iam · 1299· 10mo ago · negative8

“rug”

0x8888...1129 · 1149· 1y ago · negative8

“TGE CLAIM SUCK”TGE claim 2hrs after listing while dev are dumping and let the community to dry up.

Insik · 1296· 1y ago · negative5

“Disappointing User Experience and Overhyped Promises”I had high hopes for Assisterr, given all the buzz about its decentralized AI and community-owned Small Language Models (SLMs). As someone who’s been dabbling in Web3 and AI projects for a while, I was excited to try a platform that promised to make building AI agents accessible and rewarding. But after spending a few weeks exploring Assisterr, I’m left frustrated and underwhelmed. First off, the platform’s user interface is a mess. Navigating the dashboard feels like wading through a cluttered attic—nothing is intuitive, and I spent way too much time trying to figure out how to connect my wallet or access the AI Lab. The onboarding process is supposed to be seamless, but I ran into multiple glitches, like buttons that didn’t load properly and error messages that gave no clear fix. For a project that claims to prioritize accessibility, this was a huge letdown. Then there’s the hype around their tokenization and airdrop system. I joined the testnet to farm $sASRR POINTS, hoping to get in early on a promising project. But the tasks to earn points were repetitive and felt like busywork—endless social media quests like retweeting posts or joining Discord channels. It’s not engaging; it’s exhausting. Plus, there’s no clear explanation of how these points will convert to actual $ASRR tokens or what their value might be. It feels like a carrot on a stick, and I’m not convinced the payoff will be worth it. The community aspect, which they tout as a major selling point, also fell flat for me. I joined their Discord hoping to connect with other creators, but the channels were either spammy or eerily quiet. When I asked for help with a bug in the SLM Store, I got a canned response from a moderator that didn’t even address my issue. For a platform that’s supposed to be “community-owned,” it doesn’t feel like they’re listening to users at all. I really wanted to believe in Assisterr’s vision of decentralized AI, but the execution so far feels half-baked. The tech might have potential, but the user experience is clunky, the rewards system is vague, and the community engagement is lackluster. I’m not giving up entirely, but I’m definitely not holding my breath for this one to deliver on its lofty promises anytime soon.

MrJudge · 1177· 1y ago · negative4

12 of 14 · most upvoted firstMore ›