Believe

373 reviews, 24% of them positive.24% positive · 373 reviews· Influence factor 95, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 125 activities · Apr 2026

Believe is a Solana launchpad platform founded by Ben Pasternak that has faced overwhelming criticism for broken promises, locked funds, and repeated token migrations. Users report scam-like behavior including rug pulls, supply manipulation, poor support, unresponsive teams, and failed product delivery—with particular concerns about the chaotic $LAUNCHCOIN to $BELIEVE migration involving admitted 'math errors' and the project's history as a rebranded version of the failed Clout token. While a small number of supporters praise its innovation in lowering barriers to token launches, the dominant sentiment reflects distrust, financial losses, and accusations of deliberate extraction tactics.

What people say

Received · 373 Given · 0

“Empty Promises Wrapped in Rebrands”Once again, the same recycled pattern: a team making loud promises but delivering nothing tangible. What you see is a showcase of endorsements, not a vision for the future. From the very beginning, steep price crashes and the inability to execute on the roadmap made everything clear. Now, with a new name and fresh marketing, they’re simply repackaging the same failed story to lure in new victims. There’s no trust to be placed in projects like these. The goal is not building value, but repeating the cycle of extraction and exit.

NabiYok🍌 · 1340· 1y ago · negative14

“scam projelerden birisi. herkesi mağdur edip paralarına el koydu.”ScamPlatform

H.Keops · 1289· 1y ago · negative14

“Rebrand Without Real Innovation”I’ve seen a lot about Believe and honestly, the project doesn’t inspire confidence. It’s basically a rebrand of Pasternak’s previous failed attempt, and most people feel the trust was already lost back then. The platform looks extractive, with tokens that have no real utility and high fees more like donations than investments. They hype it as innovation, but in reality it feels like recycled ideas with poor execution. A lot of users couldn’t even get the app to work properly, and past tokens collapsed in value. It creates the wrong impression for retail investors, framing itself as “internet capital markets” while delivering little substance. Yes, some early entrants might have made profits, but long-term it doesn’t seem sustainable. Overall, the project feels hype-driven, lacks transparency, and doesn’t offer much real value more smoke and mirrors than meaningful innovation.

Nadır · 1289· 1y ago · negative14

“I don't believe”Believe started with an attractive idea, but quickly became a garbage. Instead of supporting creators, the project turned into a stream of ‘tweet-to-mint’ spam, without any moderation or verification. The model of launching tokens directly from social networks only increases the risk for users, creating an ilusion of reliability where there is none. The community is already openly discusing the lacck of transparency and manipulation of supplies, and trust in the platform is noticeably declining. Without radical changes and an honest review of the approach, the future of the project looks extremely doubting imho.

ChiterSan · 1266· 1y ago · negative14

“TOP rugger”This platform purports to make serious crime appear trivial, but it fails to inspire any confidence. I highly recommend avoiding it; interacting with it is likely to result in disappointment due to their misleading bundled offers. The app is underwhelming; I anticipated some genuine innovation, but there's nothing remarkable about it. It's disappointing, and I prefer not to waste any time on it.

Severus · 1277· 1y ago · negative14

“I’m struggling to Believe”I really like the concept behind Believe, but so far the experience hasn’t lived up to the promise. I’ve run into too many rugs, to the point where I’ve had to disable the Believe tab when trading on Axiom. It’s a solid idea in theory and I’d love to see it improve, but right now it’s hard to trust the signal.

DEL · 1207· 1y ago · negative14

“nice”

ricky blunts $ROLL · 1219· 1y ago14

“believe or not believe”honestly don't looks good mb it's because 27% postive

OtecRoma. · 1259· 1y ago · negative20

“A Sophisticated Engine for Generating Noise”At first glance, the premise of tokenizing belief is compelling. However, a deeper analysis of this model reveals a system that is not designed to create signal, but to manufacture and monetize noise. The core issue is that it mistakes financial speculation for genuine conviction. The platform creates a zero-sum or negative-sum arena where users are incentivized not to express authentic beliefs, but to front-run social sentiment. This transforms the platform from a tool for discovery into a social casino. It doesn't measure what people truly believe; it measures their ability to predict what other people will believe, creating a feedback loop of self-referential speculation that is ultimately detached from any ground truth. Furthermore, the mechanics appear to be fundamentally extractive. By financializing every social interaction, the system creates countless opportunities for value to be siphoned off through fees, spreads, or opaque tokenomics that benefit the "house" or early insiders. It's a perpetual motion machine for user engagement, but the energy it generates is primarily captured by the platform itself, not the users who power it. This is not a tool for building a more trustworthy or insightful social fabric. It is an architecture that gamifies social consensus for the purpose of capital extraction. I would exercise extreme caution, as the design itself seems engineered to ensure that, in the long run, the only winner is the platform.

mobin · 1222· 1y ago · negative20

“Believe”not like Believe for my prospect , your point of view can be different .

𝐑𝒂𝐣𝐮𝒊𝐜𝑒.𝒃𝒂𝐬𝑒.𝑒𝐭𝒉 · 1258· 9mo ago · neutral11

“Fund stuck”I have been trying to withdraw fund from their platform ,but it's always getting delayed . Looks like very bad execution from the team

0xD74f...3842 · 1205· 9mo ago · negative11

“Disgrace of launchpads”None of the promises were kept. This project reeks of being a scam; it's best to steer clear.

Aylak_Adam · 1283· 1y ago · negative13

‹ Back144 of 373 · most upvoted firstMore ›