Believe

373 reviews, 24% of them positive.24% positive · 373 reviews· Influence factor 95, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 125 activities · Apr 2026

Believe is a Solana launchpad platform founded by Ben Pasternak that has faced overwhelming criticism for broken promises, locked funds, and repeated token migrations. Users report scam-like behavior including rug pulls, supply manipulation, poor support, unresponsive teams, and failed product delivery—with particular concerns about the chaotic $LAUNCHCOIN to $BELIEVE migration involving admitted 'math errors' and the project's history as a rebranded version of the failed Clout token. While a small number of supporters praise its innovation in lowering barriers to token launches, the dominant sentiment reflects distrust, financial losses, and accusations of deliberate extraction tactics.

What people say

Received · 373 Given · 0

“gonna pass on this one for sure”If you invest in anything Pasternak or believe related at this point you need a mental eval, From my research lately I discovered They are scammers, you have harmed several investors and developers!

Linus · 1218· 9mo ago · negative10

“Tidak meyakinkan”Banyak sentiment buruk terhadap project ini. Mulai dari ponzi, scam, negative impact, bad launchpad. Dan saya melihatnya lebih kepada utilitas, tidak ada kegunaan sama sekali, hanya hype sementara saja

0xrizrekt 💵 | 🐺 · 1238· 9mo ago · negative10

“Dangerous Believe”I haven’t personally used it but a large number of users are reporting locked funds, broken promises and unclear processes, which makes this impossible to ignore. You should definitely stay away.

Visionary · 1218· 9mo ago · negative10

“Seems like many perople hate this app, the one that I didn't use, So, just gonna leave neutral.”Well As I have never used this app and never really know anything about this app, but seems like many people do hate this app already, seeing those huge number of negative reviews, so I am just gonna leave the neutral.

B0ttl3 · 1202· 9mo ago · neutral10

“Broken Promises and User Distrust”The biggest red flag came in October 2025 with the chaotic migration from $LAUNCHCOIN to $BELIEVE. What was billed as a smooth upgrade turned into a disaster due to admitted "math errors" and massive supply confusion. Holders were left scrambling, trust evaporated overnight, and the token's reputation took a permanent hit. Even the team’s own announcements about buybacks and fee redirection feel like desperate damage control rather than genuine value creation.

aldocedok · 1226· 9mo ago · negative10

“Social hype as a product”Believe made a strong impression by turning X hype directly into token launches with an extremely low barrier to entry. At its peak, it captured the chaotic energy of SocialFi well, showing how attention alone can bootstrap markets. Over time, speculation and quality issues cooled momentum, and today it feels more like an interesting experiment than a mature platform

Zarina · 1233· 10mo ago · neutral10

“Ponzi launchpad”A lot of projects launched on the Believe launchpad, but 99.9% of them are pump-and-dump scams. Almost everyone has suffered some degree of loss—myself included.

small fish · 1292· 10mo ago · negative10

“Я не верю”Ужасные отзывы, я бы не доверял этому проекту. Делайте собственный ресерч.

Oleg in Profit · 1253· 10mo ago · negative10

“another launchpad, be very careful”Just another launchpad, making it possible for anyone to launch memecoin on Solana. Anyone can launch tokens via X just by replying, therefor spaming the bad score here says everything you need to know about how trustworthy this project is.

SelfmadeGojo.base.eth · 1342· 10mo ago · negative10

“Scam Master”This project is just another scam on the Solana blockchain. Sadly, that’s quite common there - and this one is no exception. Just yesterday, they announced an increase in their token supply. These are truly scammer tactics. I don’t see how the holders of that coin can have any trust in such practices, which should honestly be considered criminal in the crypto ecosystem. We need to stop letting this kind of thing slide. We need to sanction it. We need to ban it. These are strong words, but I truly mean them. Their shady and fraudulent behavior damages the credibility of the entire crypto industry.

Zan · 1246· 1y ago · negative10

“Just in case you thought this dumpster fire couldn’t get any worse. (Spoiler: it does.)”I could probably write an essay on what I've learned about "Believe", but I don't think it's quite worth the time or energy. Instead, I'd like to share this particular tweet where the newest token they launched will sporadically be burned if you don't migrate to their *new* token within 2 weeks: https://x.com/believeapp/status/1978518893875613885 Others have written about it as well in case they delete their tweet above: https://x.com/palis/status/1978549433764925843 This is the type of antics and behavior that is erodes trust in the entire crypto ecosystem.

0xbrendan.eth · 1256· 1y ago · negative10

“BelieveApp Is a Total Dumpster Fire”I’ve been trying to give BelieveApp a chance, but man, this platform is an absolute disaster. It’s hyped up as this revolutionary way to fund creators and launch tokens through X posts, but it’s basically a scam magnet dressed up as innovation. The whole setup feels like a chaotic free-for-all where anyone can mint a token, and that’s exactly the problem. The app is flooded with shady projects and memecoins like GOONCOIN that pump up with hype and then crash into oblivion, leaving users like me holding worthless bags. I saw posts on X about how 90% of launches on BelieveApp are either hacked or straight-up rug pulls, and I’m not surprised—there’s zero vetting process worth mentioning.The app itself is a nightmare to use. The interface is clunky, slow, and looks like it was slapped together by someone who’s never heard of user experience. Transactions fail half the time, and when they do go through, you’re left praying they don’t get stuck in some blockchain limbo. Customer support? Forget it. I’ve sent multiple tickets about a botched transaction, and it’s been weeks with no response. Meanwhile, you’ve got tokens like LAUNCHCOIN—rebranded from some sketchy PASTERNAK coin—spiking 27,000% on hype alone before tanking hard, screwing over anyone who bought in. It’s like the wild west, but with worse odds. What really gets me is how BelieveApp lets creators change token details, like names or website links, even after launch. Sure, they call it “flexibility” for rebranding, but it’s a scammer’s dream. Someone could launch a token, pump it up, then swap the metadata to a phishing link or impersonate a legit project. Rugcheck.xyz pointed this out, and it’s insane that BelieveApp hasn’t fixed it. And don’t get me started on the hype around “democratizing funding.” It’s a nice tagline, but X users are calling it an inner-circle game where only the already-rich or famous get any real traction. Recent posts on X are ripping into BelieveApp for having no real value behind its tokens—just speculative fluff that collapses when the buzz dies. I believed in the idea of supporting creators, but this platform feels like a cash grab for clout-chasers and scammers. Save your money and steer clear unless you enjoy losing it.

raspon · 1221· 1y ago · negative10

‹ Back156 of 373 · most upvoted firstMore ›