Believe

373 reviews, 24% of them positive.24% positive · 373 reviews· Influence factor 95, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 125 activities · Apr 2026

Believe is a Solana launchpad platform founded by Ben Pasternak that has faced overwhelming criticism for broken promises, locked funds, and repeated token migrations. Users report scam-like behavior including rug pulls, supply manipulation, poor support, unresponsive teams, and failed product delivery—with particular concerns about the chaotic $LAUNCHCOIN to $BELIEVE migration involving admitted 'math errors' and the project's history as a rebranded version of the failed Clout token. While a small number of supporters praise its innovation in lowering barriers to token launches, the dominant sentiment reflects distrust, financial losses, and accusations of deliberate extraction tactics.

What people say

Received · 373 Given · 0

“这个项目从之前的Clout改名而来，团队显然缺乏执行力”这个项目从之前的Clout改名而来，团队显然缺乏执行力。年初发行的代币$Pasternak从高点暴跌90%，路线图完全没兑现，最后只能把之前app里的代币全数退还给购买者。四月底改头换面成Believe重新登场，用的还是原来那个代币合约，明眼人一看DEX上的走势图就知道怎么回事——典型的换汤不换药。现在他们光在推特上发币，还拉着些web2公司一起玩，搞得像是什么"互联网资本市场"，其实就是在误导散户。要我说，这种注意力代币就该老老实实跟梗图挂钩，搞这些花里胡哨的反而本末倒置。虽然顶着AllianceDAO和一堆大V的光环，甚至还有Solana官方的背书，但根本掩盖不了团队画大饼的事实。创作者实际到手的收益连承诺的50%都不到，问起来就被拉黑。2%的交易手续费收得理直气壮，可买这些代币说白了就是在捐款——条款里写得明明白白你啥都拥有不了。平台上80%的交易量都是内部人在倒手，新项目上线没几天就能跌去99%，活脱脱一个抽水机器。有用户尝试提现几个月都没成功，appstore里下载的客户端根本用不了，所谓的创新就是把Vector和Pump fun抄了个遍。当然也有人觉得这种推特发币的模式挺新鲜，确实早期进场的人赚到了钱。但你看那些暴涨暴跌的曲线，活像坐过山车，今天翻倍明天归零的戏码天天上演。团队要是真想把事情做好，就该先把透明度提上来，别整天搞些华而不实的营销。现在这情况，与其说是创新实验，不如说是把原来的骗局包装得更精致了。要参与的话，建议先做好血本无归的心理准备，毕竟连项目方自己都承认，你买的不是代币，是"捐款凭证"。

唐华斑竹🦅 · 1256· 1y ago · negative10

“meme token platform”The newly emerged fake WEB3 token platform is a paradise for scammers. The dealers all open with high market value to attract people to enter the market and then harvest

勤勤恳恳的撸小毛 · 1226· 1y ago · negative10

“Believe App可信度调查重点摘要”早期也参与过，也被骗过，今天我就结合AI的尽职调查整理一份为什么这个平台不可信的原因 1. 核心结论基于法证审计与链上数据分析，Believe App (https://x.com/believeapp) 被认定为一个经过精心包装的掠夺性金融项目。其运作模式具有显著的「拉高出货（Pump and Dump）」与「软跑路（Soft Rug Pull）」特征。目前项目活跃度已枯竭，建议用户立即远离。 2. 五大关键红旗 (Red Flags) 🚩 1. 创始人诚信破产与「换壳」惯犯历史劣迹：创始人 Ben Pasternak 拥有一系列「炒作后遗弃」的创业历史（如 Flogg, Monkey）。恶意更名：Believe App 实为失败项目 Clout 的「殭尸复活」。在前代币 $PASTERNAK 暴跌 99% 归零后，创始人未补偿投资者，而是直接将项目更名为 Believe，并发行新币 $LAUNCHCOIN（后转为 $BELIEVE）试图再次收割。 🚩 2. 代币供应量欺诈（"数学错误"丑闻）虚假公告：在代币迁移过程中，官方公告声称总供应量将增加 25%。隐形通胀：实际智能合约数据显示供应量增加了 33%。这意味著有约 8,000 万枚代币在未经披露的情况下凭空增发。性质：这不是单纯的数学失误，极大可能是项目方为自己预留的「老鼠仓」筹码，导致社区信任彻底崩塌。 🚩 3. 财务操纵与内幕交易指控内幕套现：调查指出，创始人在代币发行初期价格飙升 200 倍时，涉嫌抛售个人持仓套现约 130 万美元。价格操纵：代币价格走势呈现标准的「倒 V」型死亡螺旋，过去一年跌幅超过 99%，目前交易量极低，主力资金已撤离。 🚩 4. 技术裸奔与资金安全风险零审计：项目智能合约未经任何权威安全公司（如 CertiK）审计，代码中可能隐藏后门或无限增发漏洞。功能瘫痪：大量用户反馈 App 内的「费用索赔（Fee Claim）」和提现功能长期故障，且官方无人维护，导致用户资产实质上被冻结。 🚩 5. 法律合规黑洞证券风险：该平台的运作模式高度符合「未注册证券」定义，随时面临 SEC 等监管机构的执法与资产冻结。隐私侵犯：App 收集过度敏感数据（包括财务信息与物理地址），且法律主体模糊，用户维权无门。

Punkcan · 1422· 10mo ago · negative18

“ı dont believe”

Arzu (Ø,G) · 1160· 10mo ago · negative12

“Consistent and Trustworthy Member”Believe demonstrates reliability, steady engagement, and a constructive presence within the community. Their interactions are clear, respectful, and aligned with shared goals, making them a valuable and dependable contributor in every discussion

Yasaman | 𝔽rAI · 1271· 11mo ago12

“Wild hype with shaky ethics - not quite the decentralized dream it sells itself as”Believe App offers instant, tweet-triggered token launches using X. It’s undeniably viral, anyone with a meme and engagement can spin up a meme coin on Solana without code. But that code-free, social-first model creates fertile ground for chaos and questionable practices. Some creators report that Believe App is withholding payments unless creators sign contracts that potentially compromise their IP, forcing them into legally binding agreements before releasing their own earnings. Meanwhile, platform claims about not owning creator IP are vague at best. At one point, they paused automatic token listings to try a manual review, just to reverse course a few hours later. The tokenomics paint a messy picture. LAUNCHCOIN with nearly total supply immediately circulating, extremely high concentration among top holders (over 50%) and astronomical bull-run volatility (3,000% surges in a week). It reads more like meme mania than stable infrastructure. High fees, rampant volatility, lack of quality control and IP uncertainty make it feel more like a speculative petri dish than a fair creator economy.

Andrejka | CryptoLife · 1219· 1y ago · negative9

“Stay Away”I would rather suggest to stay away from believe if you dont want your funds to be held hostage.

CryptoCloudTV(💜,💜) · 1342· 1y ago · negative9

“Believe: A project making steady moves, still shaping its path without clear strengths or weaknesses yet.”Neither groundbreaking nor disappointing, Believe sits in the middle as it defines its role in the Web3 space.

Esclucive · 1300· 1y ago · neutral9

“Repeated Patterns, Repeated Losses”This isn’t just about one failed project — it’s a repeated pattern. From Clout to Believe, the same cycle has played out: hype, flashy launches, rebrand, and then silence when it matters most. Many supporters already lost over 90% in the past, and now the same team is trying again with a new name. The app itself adds no real innovation, funds are difficult (sometimes impossible) to withdraw, and communication is almost nonexistent. What bothers me most is how it’s framed as “equity” when in reality it gives you nothing of the sort. For me, this is not a platform to trust, but another rug waiting to happen.

Ozkiyici · 1320· 1y ago · negative9

“Bearish”Even with all the noise around its rebrand, Believe cannot escape the shadow of its past failures. The project, previously known as Clout, has already shown what happens when promises outweigh execution: a token launch in early 2023 that quickly collapsed, losing over 90% of its value and leaving supporters with nothing but disappointment. Instead of delivering on its roadmap, the team abandoned the initial product and handed tokens back, only to return months later with a new name but the same playbook. Backing from big names, KOLs, or even ecosystem support doesn’t change the fact that this team has repeatedly failed to prove they can build or sustain real value. With the same token now being pushed under the Believe brand, the red flags are impossible to ignore, and the track record speaks louder than any marketing.

Shiirenchan · 1211· 1y ago · negative9

“Too Much Hype, Not Enough Substance”While Believe App promises an innovative way for users to launch tokens and participate in decentralized funding, it falls short in execution. The platform is often overwhelmed by meme coin hype and speculative tokens, which makes it risky and confusing for average users. Issues like spam, potential scams, and manipulation of token metadata raise concerns about security and transparency. Overall, Believe App currently feels more like a gamble than a reliable crypto tool, lacking the trust and usability needed for long-term success.

Zero Sum · 1298· 1y ago · negative9

“believe发射台”之前很火，但是发射出来的token被较多机器人干预，导致大部分人亏损

tom 🎒🔴💊DOJO3.ink · 1213· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back168 of 373 · most upvoted firstMore ›