MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓263TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.7%vitalik.eth↑1.0%jeff.hl↑1.0%VouchesTucosalamanca943 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍MMatt25 WHUF → Rahulxero.hlAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethReviewsTbeagle ⨀positive · 24 upvotesBboatpositive · 10 upvotesRahulxero.hlpositive · 8 upvotesSk0rp.ethpositive · 5 upvotes
Profile· Reputable@keoneHDOn Ethos
Keone Hon

Keone Hon

419 reviews, 86% of them positive.86% positive · 419 reviews· Influence factor 247, above 49% of accounts

The record

From 67 activities · Apr 2026

Keone Hon is the cofounder and GM of Monad, a high-performance EVM L1 targeting parallel execution and sub-second finality. He brings deep expertise from high-frequency trading at Jump Trading and holds multiple MIT degrees, applying rigorous engineering and low-latency systems knowledge to blockchain infrastructure. Widely recognized for shipping relentlessly, staying close to the community, and prioritizing execution over hype, he is praised for his technical depth, hands-on leadership, and genuine engagement with builders and supporters. However, his reputation is significantly divided over Monad's airdrop distribution decisions, which disappointed many early testnet contributors and long-term community members who felt excluded or undervalued, creating persistent trust friction despite the project's technical accomplishments.

“What is Monad now? It's trash, and you've become a trash can”Monad has been one of the more controversial projects in crypto. It often felt more focused on marketing than on delivering concrete achievements or meaningful products. From my perspective, there wasn’t enough real output compared to the level of hype, and at times it seemed like attention and incentives were heavily skewed toward certain groups within the community. The community itself also felt quite polarized. Some parts were extremely enthusiastic and closely aligned with the team, while others felt excluded or underrepresented. Over time, this created a bit of a closed ecosystem where criticism or different viewpoints didn’t always get much space. I personally was in the early Telegram OG groups a few years ago, and a lot of the activity there felt more like speculation and hype rather than execution focused discussion. It often gave the impression that the community was more about loyalty to the team than constructive building. Later on, the airdrop distribution also became a point of debate, especially regarding how much value went to public figures or external contributors compared to long term community members. This led to mixed feelings among early supporters. The Discord environment, like many large crypto communities, could also feel quite intense at times, especially with status and roles influencing dynamics. Overall, while the project still has strong technical ambition and vision, the way the community and incentives were handled left a portion of users with concerns and disappointmentInob.ink · 1430· 4mo ago · negative15
‹ Back300 of 419 · most upvoted firstMore ›