MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281Majdi↓266Tradevitalik.eth↑1.2%Brandon scott↑2.9%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%Ethos↑1.0%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsCoinbase Ventures 🛡️positive · 85 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 73 upvotes一川drive 🔴positive · 33 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 29 upvotes
Profile· Questionable@leaguesfunOn Ethos
Leagues.Fun

Leagues.Fun

6 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 6 reviews· Influence factor 31, above 4% of accounts

What people say

Received · 6Given · 0
“Nice scam project”It’s just a scam project. The guys had initial investment, then they collected money from the pack sale, and after that they said, ‘We understand this is basically a pyramid scheme and it will collapse, so we’re shutting the project down and removing all liquidity from the cards. That’s why you can’t sell anything - this way it will be fair, so the price doesn’t drop if someone manages to exit earlier than others. Basically, the team’s position is completely infantile. Instead of using their brains and pushing the project onto an upward path, they just killed it and scammed their believers. No words, just emotions.PuperSuper | GoH · 1431· 10mo ago · negative26
“requiring verification”Zaddy_Fi has provided extensive information on why this project should be avoided. Before interacting with the project learn more about it DYOR!Lacrimatrix · 1442· 11mo ago · negative22
“Stay Away”From the outside it looks like Leagues.Fun are trying to recreate the FootballDotFun formula without really understanding what made it work in the first place. The biggest red flag is still their launch on Avax. It was rough, people weren’t happy, and they had every chance to refund and fix the situation but chose not to. Instead of owning it, communicating properly, or rebuilding trust, they basically went quiet and suddenly pivoted straight to Abstract like nothing happened. That kind of behaviour tells you a lot about them. If a project is already avoiding accountability this early, I don’t have much confidence in how they’ll handle anything bigger down the road. So yeah, if you’re looking at them because they “look similar” to FootballDotFun, be careful. Surface-level branding is easy to copy. Execution, transparency, and community trust are not. At the end of the day it’s your choice, but personally I wouldn’t touch a project that already ducked at its first real test and copies everything the original does.Samooves · 1415· 11mo ago · negative22
“ATTENZIONE PREGO, PROBABILE SCAM”Ho trovato questo post che spiega un po' l'accaduto https://x.com/Zaddy_Fi/status/1991116748070764793?t=idC3ugYeXVMa5OY4nynJqQ&s=19 Fate attenzione prima di investire soldi in questo progetto. DYORCryptomane420.base.eth · 1629· 11mo ago · negative16
“проект - пустышка”scam и позор. они провели продажу паков после которой запустили всего несколько турниров. Игроков из паков невозможно продать, так как они ввели налог на продажу более 60%,а затем и вовсе закрыли все операции по продаже. Больше месяца от них никаких новостей и активностей. Проект умер вместе со средствами пользователей, хотя они могли просто сделать рефанд.cryptof4ck · 1301· 10mo ago · negative14
“scam”scamCragHack | GoH · 2106· 11mo ago · negative11
6 of 6 · most upvoted first