Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)

28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 25 activities · Apr 2026

A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.

What people say

Received · 28 Given · 241

“???”Tagged me in some random twitter drama from a year ago and called me a slur. https://i.imgur.com/8vvNOt9.png https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/709147/ I don't know sassypantsnininja, and I have no clue why tf he's tagging me. The tweet he mentions me under is made by hrithikk and is about GrindingPoet. The only screenshot in that tweet that shows GP's username is the "GrindingPoet has blocked you" image. hrithikk has been frequently calling GP out for "donation scamming" but the other screenshots of telegram messages don't show any username and look to be from some random alpha chat. Not sure what exactly happened here, but it looks like someone probably pretended to be GP. hrithikk was annoying GP and calling him a scammer, so he got blocked. That's my assumption based on the lack of proper proof from hrithikk that would actually tie the messages to GP. Why I'm being dragged into some drama from a year ago by sassypants - I don't know. Don't tag me in some random bullshit. Especially not in the way you did.

on sassypantsninja · 1337· 4mo ago · negative14

“Stoney legend 😤”Stoneys were one of the first communities I called home; SM created a great place to vibe and share dope art. He's been around since forever and has always been very supportive and has always kept the vibes high - even deep in the bear. During the golden age of manifold, SM has supported a LOT of artists and shared a LOT of amazing art he found while scrolling the manifold mint feed that showed all newly deployed art - during that time I minted well over a thousand NFTs from various artists - not based on their names or reputation, but based on the art itself. SM is a great artist himself, he made me a 1/1 artwork of one of my cats which I truly appreciate. Now my meow will live forever on the ethereum blockchain 🤍 SM is a legend :)

on Satoshi’s Mom · 1372· 1y ago14

“Most feared person in DPRK”Tay is a legend. Straight shooter, no fluff or bullshit. I've seen people on twitter sometimes focus more on the tone of the message rather than the content of the message, which in most cases was rooted in the fact that many people couldn't handle a female researcher knowing more than they do 😹 Lowkey kinda funny, because when Tay speaks about security you better listen up. If you are unfamiliar, I recommend checking the github repo on Lazarus / DPRK: https://github.com/tayvano/lazarus-bluenoroff-research

on Tay 💖 · 1695· 1y ago14

“Spammer”Joined a discord server I’m in, and within two minutes half the server got friend requests from him. Anyone who had their twitter connected also got twitter shill DMs. He will use your community to shill crap and turn your users into a personal leads list. I didn’t even look beyond that, I don’t know the project he is shilling but it’s sus enough to stay away from it.

on Nomico | 诺米科 🐬 · 1199· 1y ago · negative14

“rebranded grift”project 02 -> rare friends The Rare Friends mint has the following mint lists: >"Poopie's Mint" >Started: September 14 at 8:00 PM GMT+2 >1 wallet, up to 64 mints of 1024 supply >"$RAREFRIENDS Fair Launch Supply" >Started: September 14 at 8:30 PM GMT+2 >1 wallet, up to 128 mints of 1024 supply >"Partners Airdrop Supply" >Started: September 14 at 9:30 PM GMT+2 >1 wallet, up to 192 mints of 1024 supply >"Whitelist FCFS" >Starts: September 14 at 10:00 PM GMT+2 >709 wallets, up to 709 mints of 1024 supply Those lists would add up to 1093 (out of 1024), so it's slightly overallocated. As of now 967/1024 are minted 1.6M USDG volume $5000+ floor Public mint (of the remaining 57 NFTs) was supposed to start 25 minutes ago: >"Public stage" >Starts: September 16 at 4:00 PM GMT+2 Instead, it was silently postponed by yet another day: Starts: September 17 at 4:00 PM GMT+2 Public stage was already moved multiple times: 14 September -> 15 September -> 16 September -> 17 September You can see it in the IPFS configuration changes on the OS page: https://imgur.com/a/l9SFzFy https://x.com/TheOnlyWidow/status/2099833355646963865 poopie never planned this mint to reach public stage, it's insiders max extracting only. Initially the public mint was supposed to happen on the same day as previous lists (September 14) but it kept being postponed multiple times with no specified reason. Even though only a handful of unminted NFTs remains, poopie will keep postponing it so that only insider wallets can mint. And whoever gets frustrated and sends out bids will get dumped on by insiders. Btw since making this review 2 hours ago, the NFT floor price did a -50% 😅 https://imgur.com/a/lDhk2yw Which is probably related to the token part of rare friends + the fact that they keep postponing public access so that the remaining ~50 NFTs go to insiders as well... plus it serves as an incentive for outsiders to send out bids instead of waiting on more delays, which gives insiders the opportunity to dump. The constant public stage postponing is there mainly to make people who wanted to freemint on public stage frustrated. If they decide to send out a few bids instead of waiting on more delays, then it will just let insiders dump into bids. Poopie is in max extract mode.

on Rare Friends · 1096· 32d ago · negative48

“farming their users with cube mints and fees to finish tasks”I feel like the correct way to use L3 is not minting their cubes or doing any tasks, but just discovering new platforms and protocols that have campaigns with L3. The cubes thing has been such a waste of time and money. It's unbelievable. They required you to mint cubes to mark tasks as finished. Which means you constantly had to mint the same cube NFT over and over and over - which definitely adds up over time and spams your wallet with useless cube NFTs. On top of that -> Layer3 also takes an additional fee on every cube mint. You literally have pay them to finish campaign tasks - for which they are already getting paid by the platforms that created those campaigns... WTF? They don't have to farm their users because they are already getting paid... yet they still chose to farm their users. At one point I used to be on top of their leaderboards and also got their measly airdrop that BARELY covered the cost of minting the cubes and paying fees to L3 for every minted cube. To be honest I think I actually lost money because the airdrop just barely covered the mainnet activity, I don't think I even looked at the spend on other chains LOL The only upside is that I discovered a lot of nice platforms and protocols through L3 that I otherwise wouldn't have known about. Gas.zip is one of the platforms that I've been using constantly, and I only know about them due to the Layer3 task (I used gas.zip 579 times up until today.) But yeah, their whole cube model and taking fees to finish tasks is absolutely stupid. Don't do that. Just lurk at the campaigns, skip the cubes and their token. All of that is worthless. Use L3 primarily to find new protocols and platforms through the campaigns but don't give L3 any of your money.

on Layer3 · 1300· 4mo ago · negative17

“scam DMs”Scam DMs. Sent me the following message: "Hello Miya My name is Thomas, I represent Winklevoss Capital We’ve noticed your profile and your activity, and we’d like to offer you a place in our foundation Let me know if you're interested" The next step is getting drained 😹

on Thomas · 1171· 6mo ago · negative13

“known him since 2021”I've known Lit for quite a few years now. He was a Jr. Moderator at a project I've joined in ~2021. At some point I became a Moderator -> Sr. Moderator for the same project and got to know him better in some private & group chats. We often didn't agree on the same things and our opinions sometimes clashed to the point it got really annoying - but while we might not always agree on the same things, I can say that Lit is a honest and passionate person. We did have a lot of great conversations over the years. One thing I really appreciate about him is that he also likes to contribute and make things he is involved in better than they currently are. While we were mods at the same project, we were both constantly providing feedback and coming up with new things to make the product and user experience better. If Lit likes what you're doing, there's a high chance he will sooner or later provide you with massive amounts of feedback.

on Lit 🔥🍀🚫 · 1274· 7mo ago13

“scam outreach”Scam profile trying to phish people. They will try to lure you into meetings, it's the type of ancient crypto scam where they try to phish you via fake meeting links. Part of their message: "Reaching out to you from the team at Consensus VC Fund @consensusvcfund (...) To get in touch and learn more, please message our Venture Partner and investor on Telegram: @alisheikh_vc, and he will explain everything." Sending the both @ here as it might be beneficial to avoid their future scams.

on Marlon Hank ∞ · 1091· 8mo ago · negative13

“every connection has a different name, too many permissions required”Tried to use it due to the Ethos exclusive access. First they need Discord connection. I really hate it when web3/crypto services don't have a crypto native sign in (like SIWE) - but okay, whatever. The Legion Discord connection app is called "Quastor" and gives them access to your email address. Not really a fan of giving random apps too much access to personal data if it's not needed. And it's not needed. Also not a fan of services having connections using different names, as it makes it harder to pinpoint what service it is when you periodically revoke access (or when you get rekt by a malicious approval). If you sign in via Discord you still don't get the Ethos bonus. To actually get the Ethos bonus you will need to connect your Twitter account as well - tbh they could have just used the Discord/Ethos connection for that. Or you know, just use Twitter connection and nothing else. Or even better, used a crypto native wallet sign in. Any of those would already prove Ethos score/human verification on it's own - but only one is valid (SIWE - as no personal data is shared besides wallet -> which already lets them pinpoint the ethos profile and score) When trying to connect Twitter to get your Ethos bonus, even if you're logged in, they try to log you in via a new session. Why? I took a look around their service and immediately revoked all access and nuked the last session. Their Twitted connection app is called "Excellerate". Legion platform -> Quastor on Discord -> Excellerate on Twitter? The permissions it wants from your Twitter include: "Upload media like photos and videos for you." "Post and repost for you". NOPE NOPE NOPE! The permissions and data sharing seems to snowball with every step. Different connection names, the permissions snowballing, the session sign in to connect twitter, the twitter media upload and posting permissions... Yikes! That's a no go for me. Way too intrusive. If you feel the same way about the platform then don't forget to revoke app access + log out of the newly made twitter session. Or you know, just don't even use it in the first place.

on LEGION · 1547· 6mo ago · negative23

“not very "big brain"”This guy just spams "Great Project" reviews for everyone, including people that definitely are NOT projects lol

on Big𝔹𝕣𝕒𝕚𝕟 · 1160· 54d ago · negative12

“Nick's patsy. the rot that destroyed the ENS DAO”Highly relevant review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/710295/the-rot-that-destroyed-ens Katherine was the one that put in all the proposals for Nick and endorsed Nick yoinking ~$500M from the DAO. https://discuss.ens.domains/t/temp-check-next-era-of-ens-dao-empowering-the-ens-foundation/22175 Also wrote the proposal for a new Security Council, one fully controlled by Nick: https://discuss.ens.domains/t/draft-social-proposal-for-a-new-security-council/22219 Before that Nick said: >Speaking personally: I will vote against any replacement Security Council that includes a member on record saying they would veto a proposal that does not violate the ENS Constitution. And I will vote against any replacement Council that does not commit to that standard publicly before the vote. Which basically translates to: "I will use my 50% of the voting supply to remove anyone that disagrees with me snatching $500M from the DAO." Katherine is basically just Nick's patsy. She is not to be trusted.

on Katherine Wu | katherine.eth · 1552· 4mo ago · negative12

‹ Back120 of 241 · most upvoted firstMore ›