Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Donald J. Trump
Ethos
Bold
jeff.hl
Tucosalamanca
Dpuck (bob)
MMatt
Anton Boiarchuk
Tbeagle ⨀
Bboat
Rahulxero.hlProfile· Known@miyaspokeofthisOn Ethos
Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)
28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accountsThe record
From 25 activities · Apr 2026A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.
What people say
Received · 28Given · 241“internet legend”if you grew up chronically online and were a regular on imageboards, then you should probably know who this legend is. 420chan FTW! <3
on Kirtaner / Milady Maker for 💞Game Boy!!💫 · 1267· 1y ago5
on Kirtaner / Milady Maker for 💞Game Boy!!💫 · 1267· 1y ago5“worst marketplace ever”Censorship and unfriendliness. Crappy support. Restricting artists based on geolocation. Not fixing issues they've been contacted about for years, even after claiming that "a fix is about to be deployed". Restricting ENS names they deem too controversial to be traded (LOL) Recently their new CTO asked about improvements on twitter and we started DMing after a short public exchange, you can scroll up from here: https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1961608763925741719 Someone I know got banned for their VPN usage. People get routinely flagged for VPN usage, and if you connect from a sanctioned country once (that VPN connection prevents ads on streaming sites lol) they will nuke your profile and won't ever unlock it. Even if it's a singular and obvious VPN connection. Talked with their CTO about. Even though that persons US based employer, including the CEO of the company (!!!), reached out to them vouching for that person - OS decided to keep that person banned - including nuking their deployed collections. I talked with their CTO about some other OS issues - banner scaling (always stretching, preventing anyone from seeing the banner 1:1 the way it was intended), removing the "view original image" option to view full resolution. All the things I've tried OS to fix for literal years by now. Finally thought someone might fix some issues. Even talked about some issues regarding ENS display that opensea was struggling with. As a thanks for my help, they restricted a bunch of my ENS names on their platform because they decided they are too 'controversial' to be traded. So much for open decentralized markets lmao.
on OpenSea · 1891· 1y ago · negative17
on OpenSea · 1891· 1y ago · negative17“promoting drainers, lack of accountability, not sharing details of the person behind the drainer”You're putting your personal stamp of approval on everything you choose to promote. We're talking about leveraging reach, reputation, amount of followers and notability (=your name/brand) to promote something in return for a payment. Your stamp of approval carries weight. So does getting people rekt via misplaced endorsements and promoting rugs/drainers. ESPECIALLY when you failed to do basic due diligence and just blindly accepted the money while ignoring the red flags / choosing not to see them. When you promote something then it's up to you to do your due diligence instead of blindly accepting offers and potentially ruining your reputation when people get affected - as is the case here. When you're entertaining offers from anon telegram accounts to promote something, and they want to pay you via the platform (obfuscating the address of origin) then it's imho enough of a red flag to choose to not accept the money. If you for some reason decide to accept payments to promote something that has red flags (because "yaay free money"), and you opt in to leverage your name to put a stamp of approval on it - then it means that when something rugs or drains people, there will obviously be repercussions and an impact to your reputation. (Duh.) Imho. the lack of DD and logical thinking, as well as the post-scam response and choosing not to share the messages / TG username of the person who paid you to promote a scam is definitely weird. I usually like to give people the benefit of the doubt, maybe not so much in crypto, but the reaction does speak for itself. When the rug/drainer promoter decides not to share the username/messages from the scammer behind the drainer - that's a massive eyebrow raising decision. "if someone will contact me like zach i will provide it otherwise i dont care about slash here" (https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434?replyId=69223) This response is incomprehensible to me. Why would someone choose not to share the messages or the TG username of the scammer that had them stake their reputation on promoting a drainer? Choosing to "protect" the scammer and making it harder to gather information about the scammer is certainly not the way to handle the fallout of you promoting drainers. Related to this slash: https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434/promoting-a-wallet-drainer
on Aleiah · 1152· 6mo ago · negative4
on Aleiah · 1152· 6mo ago · negative4“Awful!”I used to recommend Human Passport for sybil protection, but oh boy do I regret it now. I used to have over 2x the required "Human Score" from the NFT and ETH activity badges alone - because I have a lot of NFTs and I've been active onchain for the past 4 and a half year on my public wallet. I do not sybil, I do not use automated tools. My activity has been pretty consistent. For clarity: 2922 tx on mainnet ETH / over 1630 days (4 years, 170 days) = avg. 1.79tx per day + 744tx on Base and some exploratory activity on other L2s, but mostly sticking to mainnet ETH. All of that is obviously organic activity. A project I was looking into required having a passable Humanity score, so I went to check my Passport since some badges require a refresh every ~90 days - suddenly all my onchain activity was nuked to the bare minimum. Shouldn't consistent activity and collecting more NFTs actually make my score higher or at least maintain it? (my score was already maxxed out!) Well, the people from Passport weren't really helpful, didn't want to investigate what happened and couldn't tell me why. They couldn't tell me anything because they "do not want people to know the mechanics and game the system". I obviously don't care about their mechanics, but I want some clarity on why my onchain score went from MAX to ZERO. Considering my onchain activity and NFT collection grew - the score that was already maxxed out shouldn't get lower. Especially not that low: https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1955526501111103667 https://x.com/badboykrys/status/1955530083386658913 My collection of 1700+ NFTs includes: plenty verified collections, 100+ ENS domains, collections deployed on manifold / makersplace / niftygateway / foundation / knownorigin / scatter, etc My Passport NFT score? It used to be maxxed out - now it ticks the "owns 1 NFT" box... LOL I was part of OS closed beta and Blur closed beta and did quite some product testing in web3 (remember SoHo portfolio tracker? I contributed to that as well and I still dearly miss that wonderful app...). My onchain reputation being nuked to 0 is seriously awful. Getting Passport to give me an answer why that happened or getting them to investigate - impossible. Now the only option to get to a passable humanity score - "Verify your identity with government ID". So now I have to KYC my public wallet to participate in some projects using Passport for anti-sybil? Eww! Recommending them to projects surely did misfire LMAO I obviously am not going to upload my ID in relation to my public wallet - but I also don't want to set up a new wallet and build up a transaction history and reputation on it - when I already have a public wallet with 4 YEARS 170 DAYS OF ORGANIC ACTIVITY! But those are my only options since I am basically blacklisted as a sybil and prevented from project participation / getting airdrops... Today I reached out to Passport again since another project I was interested in is using them - but got the same answer, can't investigate, can't tell me why my score got lower - but they mentioned they are using TRUSTA and being flagged there might impact my Passport score. I guess the person of contact told me why I'm flagged without really telling me why I'm flagged - I guess that's internal policy lol Apparently Trusta uses AI to auto flag wallets and weigh their reputation / flag sybils. And apparently their system, which is used by many projects, is flawed and falsely flagging organic users as sybils/bots. So that means any project that uses Trusta will flag me. And projects that don't use Trusta might use Passport -which also uses Trusta... That means this Trusta flag impacting the Passport score leads to being blacklisted across a lot of reputation score systems and getting flagged as inorganic/sybil/bot across pretty much every upcoming airdrop - because projects will use one of those services to filter out sybils. If they don't use Trusta, they will use Passport - which also uses Trusta. GG!
on Human Passport · 1213· 1y ago · negative4
on Human Passport · 1213· 1y ago · negative4“Incentivizing positive reviews to inflate reputation score before a liquidity extraction event”The default channel after joining their discord server is the announcement channel. That channel has this message sent by Elorsen: >🎉 10 Kawaii GTD Giveaway 🎉 >Make a good review post about my Ethos and send a screenshot in this channel ethos-review-screenshot >I’ll give FREE mint support (GTD) to 10 winners. https://i.imgur.com/Eq1BQt3.png They are basically incentivizing positive reviews with the promise of free mints. This is a way to inflate the score and seem more reputable than they actually are. As you can see in the screenshot, they are also promoting a private group right under the message incentivizing positive reviews. The reputation inflation scheme has only one purpose. Inflate score to seem more reputable -> funnel more people to the private group -> run up a liquidity extraction event in the private group. All the recent positive reviews were made with free mint incentives in mind. The reviews aren't genuine, they are just incentivized. And it's all leading up to a liquidity extraction event in their private group. Caution advised, don't become their exit liquidity!
on CoinMemes · 1326· 4mo ago · negative11
on CoinMemes · 1326· 4mo ago · negative11“Oekaki friend :)”A friend from the Oekaki server, he actually has a PhD and has saved my cat from a tree :)
on Q ❦ (Q/Acc⁷) =͟͟͞🌈⃤ 🕊️🌞 · 1233· 7mo ago3
on Q ❦ (Q/Acc⁷) =͟͟͞🌈⃤ 🕊️🌞 · 1233· 7mo ago3“moemoe means ily”moemoe is a project by my friend Bluu :) We share multiple communities like Milady, Remilio, Kemonokaki, Radbro, Yumemono, retart, nonon and many more. Now also moemoe 🤍
on moemoe ✮ 🎀 萌萌 🎀 ✮ · 1221· 8mo ago3
on moemoe ✮ 🎀 萌萌 🎀 ✮ · 1221· 8mo ago3“thicc thugz task force”I love Dom, seeing his tweets out in the wild is always funny. If you know you know.
on Based Dom NiggaButt/Acc · 1402· 8mo ago3
on Based Dom NiggaButt/Acc · 1402· 8mo ago3“A true cypherpunk”Tim wholeheartedly loves Ethereum mainnet. There are many Ethereum believers out there, myself included, but nobody believes as strong as he does. That's because there are very few people who understand Ethereum as much as he does. When I hear the word "cypherpunk" I immediately have to think about Tim. A true cypherpunk. "Free speech, free markets, free association, free information, free thought, free Ross, free Roman." -Tim Clancy
on tim-clancy.gwei · 1376· 8mo ago3
on tim-clancy.gwei · 1376· 8mo ago3
