MoversGrethos↓268Abhi | AP Collective↓254Ethos↑230openthefridge ❄️↓208Sk0rp.eth↑169Tradeclioagent.eth↑12.1%Pump.fun↓8.0%Hyperliquid↑20.2%kimchi↓18.0%VouchesAndrewD400 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴Arce135 WHUF → Serpin TaxtSamorityanin🧢20 WHUF → STALKER 🐉Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → ₿ot₿orgReviewskimchinegative · 99 upvoteskimchinegative · 70 upvotesAutistic Intelligence (Reworking Site)positive · 57 upvotesPlanBneutral · 39 upvotes
Profile· Reputable@monadOn Ethos
Monad

Monad

1,947 reviews, 67% of them positive.67% positive · 1,947 reviews· Influence factor 293, above 59% of accounts

The record

From 843 activities · Apr 2026

Monad is a high-performance EVM-compatible Layer 1 with impressive technical architecture—parallel execution, 10,000 TPS target, and low latency—that has attracted a passionate community and strong funding. However, the project is deeply polarized: supporters praise the tech, speed, and community bonds formed during testnet, while a substantial portion of the community feels betrayed by the airdrop distribution, which heavily favored influencers and external crypto participants over testnet users who spent months testing and providing feedback. The core tension centers on broken trust—many early supporters view the tokenomics as extractive and the community rewards as unfair, with testnet participants receiving minimal allocation despite their contributions, while others remain bullish on the technical foundation and long-term potential.

“Disappointing Experience with monad Unfair Airdrop Distribution”As someone who was initially excited about monad and its potential in the blockchain space, I feel compelled to share my disappointment with the project, particularly regarding its airdrop distribution. While monad promised an inclusive and rewarding approach to its community, the execution of the airdrop has left many early supporters, including myself, feeling sidelined and undervalued.The primary issue lies in the unfair distribution of the airdrop. Despite the project's claims of rewarding active community members, the allocation process seemed heavily skewed toward a small group of insiders or large stakeholders. Many dedicated users who contributed through engagement, testing, or promotion were either left with negligible rewards or entirely excluded. The lack of transparency in how the airdrop was calculated or distributed only added to the frustration. No clear criteria were shared, leaving the community guessing and speculating about favoritism or potential manipulation.Moreover, the communication from monad’s team has been lackluster. When concerns about the airdrop were raised on platforms like X, responses were either vague or nonexistent, which only fueled distrust. For a project that emphasizes decentralization and community involvement, this approach feels contradictory and alienates the very users who helped build early momentum.Beyond the airdrop, the project’s overall direction seems promising but lacks the polish expected from a team with such ambitious goals. Updates are sporadic, and the roadmap feels unclear, making it hard to stay confident in monad’s long-term vision. While I still believe in the potential of the technology, the handling of the airdrop and the lack of accountability have significantly dampened my enthusiasm.In conclusion, monad’s unfair airdrop distribution and poor community engagement have left a sour taste. I hope the team takes this feedback seriously and works to rebuild trust with their community. Until then, I can’t recommend getting deeply involved with this project.Cryptozero · 1297· 1y ago · negative12
‹ Back1,260 of 1,947 · most upvoted firstMore ›