MoversGrethos↓276Abhi | AP Collective↓255Ethos↑221jeff.hl↑218openthefridge ❄️↓205TradePump.fun↓3.5%Sk0rp.eth↓1.2%Frank↓1.6%aikendrum.eth↑3.2%VouchesPublius50 WHUF → Fishy CatfishStonks Surfer24 WHUF → Samorityanin🧢Itsakm81 WHUF → aikendrum.ethMaster Yi ⛺1 WHUF → LedgerReviewsLedgernegative · 95 upvotesIrys (✧ᴗ✧)negative · 57 upvotes𝑿_𝑩𝑳𝑨𝒁𝑬𝑹*negative · 56 upvotesEthosiansneutral · 47 upvotes
Profile· Reputable@monadOn Ethos
Monad

Monad

1,947 reviews, 67% of them positive.67% positive · 1,947 reviews· Influence factor 293, above 59% of accounts

The record

From 843 activities · Apr 2026

Monad is a high-performance EVM-compatible Layer 1 with impressive technical architecture—parallel execution, 10,000 TPS target, and low latency—that has attracted a passionate community and strong funding. However, the project is deeply polarized: supporters praise the tech, speed, and community bonds formed during testnet, while a substantial portion of the community feels betrayed by the airdrop distribution, which heavily favored influencers and external crypto participants over testnet users who spent months testing and providing feedback. The core tension centers on broken trust—many early supporters view the tokenomics as extractive and the community rewards as unfair, with testnet participants receiving minimal allocation despite their contributions, while others remain bullish on the technical foundation and long-term potential.

“Monad Airdrop Controversy: Community Backlash Over Eligibility and Transparency”Based on numerous reports and widespread community feedback, the airdrop distribution planned by Monad (@monad) is facing significant controversy and criticism. The primary concerns center on the eligibility criteria, the exclusion of dedicated community members, and a perceived lack of transparency from the project’s foundation.Core Criticisms Against Monad's AllocationThe criticisms against the Monad airdrop are focused on several key areas, suggesting a misalignment between the project's stated goals and its rewards structure:Exclusion of Testnet Contributors:A major point of contention is the alleged exclusion of many users who actively participated in Monad’s testnet environment. Critics argue that these individuals provided free, crucial testing and development support, yet are being overlooked in favor of other distribution methods, prompting widespread frustration within the technical community.Hyperliquid Trading and NFT Holders Disqualified:Despite initial expectations that activity on key perpetuals exchanges like Hyperliquid and ownership of HypurrNFTs would be prioritized, reports indicate that most of these users did not meet the final eligibility thresholds. Instances of users with substantial trading volumes (reported to be over $200 million) being disqualified have amplified the disappointment among the derivatives trading community.Marginalizing the Discord Community:Data analyzed by DeFi researchers, including Coin Metrika, highlights a severe disproportion in the allocation strategy. Only a fraction of the active Discord community—estimated at just 5,500 wallets, or 0.74% of Discord users—were deemed eligible. Simultaneously, the project is allocating tokens to approximately 225,000 external addresses, many of whom have no verifiable history or engagement with the Monad ecosystem.Lack of Disclosure and Policy Opacity:A persistent source of community skepticism is the Monad Foundation's refusal to disclose clear details regarding the airdrop's allocation rules, vesting schedules, or the total token supply. This opacity leaves participants uncertain about the value and future utility of the token and fuels distrust regarding the fairness of the distribution.Regulatory Exclusion of U.S. Users:Consistent with industry trends, U.S. residents are excluded from the distribution due to regulatory constraints. This exclusion, while standard practice for many token launches, underscores the ongoing compliance difficulties projects face when attempting a global distribution.Security and Scam Risks:The controversy was further complicated when Monad co-founder Keone Hon issued a public security warning after scammers successfully compromised the project’s official Telegram channel. These bad actors promoted fake claim portals, highlighting the acute security risks that accompany high-profile token distribution events.SHAHIN 🦅 · 1211· 1y ago · negative11
“The Overhyped "Ethereum Killer" That Brings Nothing New”Let’s be brutally honest—Monad Network is just another wannabe "Ethereum killer" with the same recycled promises we’ve heard a hundred times before. High throughput? Parallel execution? Low fees? Solana did it. Aptos did it. Sui did it. Hell, even Fantom tried. So what exactly makes Monad special? Nothing. It’s the same old story with a fresh coat of paint and a bigger marketing budget. The "Community"? Just a Bunch of Mercenaries Waiting to Dump If you’re looking for real developers and long-term believers, you won’t find them here. Monad’s so-called "community" is 90% airdrop hunters, degenerate traders, and VC-backed shillers waiting to pump and dump. The discussions aren’t about real innovation—they’re about token price, airdrop farming, and exit strategies. Sound familiar? That’s because it’s the same script every overhyped L1 follows before fading into irrelevance. The Tech? Nothing Revolutionary Yeah, Monad uses parallel execution—big deal. Solana’s been doing that for years. Optimized EVM? Fantom and BSC already tried. The truth is, Monad isn’t bringing anything truly new to the table. It’s just another VC-funded experiment hoping to ride the hype wave before the next shiny thing steals the spotlight. Will Monad Fail? Not Necessarily—But Will It Matter? Let’s be real: Monad might technically work, but so what? The crypto space is littered with "functional" blockchains that nobody uses. Unless Monad can pull off real adoption (spoiler: it won’t), it’ll just become another ghost chain propped up by speculators until the next big thing comes along. Final Verdict: Skip the Hype, Save Your Money If you’re here for quick profits, good luck—you’re competing against insiders and VCs who will dump on retail. If you’re here for real tech, look elsewhere. Monad is just another overhyped blockchain in a sea of copycats. Wake us up when something actually changes. (And no, a slightly tweaked consensus mechanism doesn’t count as innovation.)Farhad 🦍 · 1312· 1y ago · negative11
‹ Back1,416 of 1,947 · most upvoted firstMore ›