Monad

1,947 reviews, 67% of them positive.67% positive · 1,947 reviews· Influence factor 293, above 59% of accounts

The record

From 843 activities · Apr 2026

Monad is a high-performance EVM-compatible Layer 1 with impressive technical architecture—parallel execution, 10,000 TPS target, and low latency—that has attracted a passionate community and strong funding. However, the project is deeply polarized: supporters praise the tech, speed, and community bonds formed during testnet, while a substantial portion of the community feels betrayed by the airdrop distribution, which heavily favored influencers and external crypto participants over testnet users who spent months testing and providing feedback. The core tension centers on broken trust—many early supporters view the tokenomics as extractive and the community rewards as unfair, with testnet participants receiving minimal allocation despite their contributions, while others remain bullish on the technical foundation and long-term potential.

What people say

Received · 1.9K Given · 0

“çok harika bir proje marketcapta en iyi yerlerde göreceğiz”

sadık barlas$XAGE · 1211· 1y ago7

“Expect a big fail after TGE”On paper monad looks good. But in fact I expect a big fail like berachain once airdrop is done and some users will be left behind. TPS is high, but tell me why do we need one more L1?

kiroshima.hl · 1264· 1y ago · negative7

“Fusion of Innovation and Reliability”The Monad Project truly stands out as a next generation platform that blends cutting edge technology with remarkable user centric design. Its performance efficiency and scalability make it a game changer in the decentralized ecosystem. The developers have clearly prioritized both functionality and simplicity, resulting in an intuitive experience even for first time users. I was particularly impressed by its lightning fast transaction speeds and minimal latency. The documentation is thorough, making onboarding and integration surprisingly smooth. Monad’s commitment to transparency and continuous improvement builds genuine trust within its community. Beyond the technical excellence, the project’s vision for sustainable and secure innovation is deeply inspiring. Overall, the Monad Project exemplifies what modern blockchain technology should strive to achieve powerful, accessible, and forward-thinking.

poseidon · 1189· 1y ago7

“Built for Real Performance”Monad’s been getting a lot of attention lately and honestly, it makes sense. It’s an ambitious Layer-1 built for high performance with full EVM compatibility and parallel execution that could seriously push blockchain speed to the next level. What stands out is how active and transparent the team is; their posts on X actually explain the tech instead of just hyping it. The community vibe around Monad feels strong too most people who follow the project seem genuinely bullish. Of course, like any new L1, the real test will come when mainnet adoption ramps up and the system faces real load. But so far, Monad looks like one of the few projects that might actually deliver on the “fast and secure” promise.

𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 · 1261· 1y ago7

“MONAD - GAME OF GAS FEE”actually monad will solve the generational problem called high gas fee, a good Chian, a good healthy community, strong team , high tech is involved , now more than 2.5B interaction in testnet soon mainnet will change the crypto plane

ONEMAN · 1300· 1y ago7

“Bullish on monad”I’ve been on monad since the first day of the testnet and I’m really vouching for them

ZAYD ⌘ · 1252· 1y ago7

“The project keeps delivering and feels like one worth watching closely. An exciting L1 scalable up to 10,000 TPS!”

Happy88.eth ❤️ 🎩 · 1391· 1y ago12

“Chain Hype yang Gagal Menjaga Kepercayaan”Menurut pengalamanku, Monad terasa mengecewakan dari sisi perlakuan ke komunitas. Banyak orang ikut testnet, buang waktu dan tenaga, tapi ujungnya tidak ada bentuk apresiasi yang jelas. Rasanya kerja keras itu dianggap angin lalu. Yang kelihatan justru perhatian lebih ke lingkaran sendiri, bukan ke kontributor yang benar-benar ikut membangun sejak awal Hal lain yang bikin ilfeel, narasi dan exposure lebih sering jatuh ke hal-hal dangkal, sementara feedback dan kontribusi nyata dari komunitas kurang dihargai. Setelah mainnet jalan, ekosistemnya juga terasa sepi. Aktivitas DeFi, NFT, dan eksperimen lain tidak berkembang seperti yang diharapkan. Secara keseluruhan, kesannya proyek ini kehilangan arah dan gagal menjaga kepercayaan orang-orang yang sudah lebih dulu percaya

DM · 1278· 9mo ago · negative9

“Tam bir fiyasko”yapılacak en büyük kötülük testnet yapan kişileri dışarıda bırakmak ve emeklerine saygı göstermemek işte gerçekler..

Ilhan Tunçkol🚢FD1H · 1268· 12mo ago · negative9

“Scam project”The biggest SCAM project I have ever seen, please report them and destroy everything 🙏 I have a lot of hatred for those who have been working for 1 year and are neglecting everyone by making people suffer so much. Please all the big admins talk about them. Monad team scam the basic community and gave huge amount of tokens to big accounts to silence them.

LC.Thong · 1213· 12mo ago · negative9

“airdrop dağıtımı kötü aylarca uğraştır aiirdrop verme bu hiç adil değil”

sadık barlas$XAGE · 1211· 1y ago · negative9

“Re-thinking Community”I’ve been reflecting on the recurring phrase “community first” that this project promotes, and the more I observe, the less that slogan seems to hold up in practice. While the messaging emphasizes inclusivity and prioritizing the community, the actual distribution of opportunities and rewards suggests otherwise. From my perspective, a significant portion of the recent allocations has gone not to long-time supporters or active community members, but rather to individuals and groups from outside the ecosystem. For instance, holders of established blue-chip NFTs, projects with already strong reputations and networks, are being given preferential access. While this might serve as a marketing or partnership strategy, it simultaneously undermines the very community that has been supporting this project from its earliest stages. What’s even more concerning is that certain CT influencers, including those who have publicly spread skepticism or outright FUD about the project, appear to have received allocations or exclusive Monad cards. Meanwhile, many core contributors, testnet participants, and engaged Discord members are left questioning their place in the supposed hierarchy of “community.” This creates a perception problem that runs deeper than simple favoritism. If “community first” is meant to define the project’s, then prioritizing external recognition over internal loyalty erodes trust. Community members are not just followers, they’re stakeholders whose ongoing engagement determines the project’s sustainability. When their efforts are devalued in favor of symbolic partnerships or influencer attention, the narrative shifts from community-driven growth to external validation. As someone who genuinely supports the project, I believe transparency and alignment between message and action are essential. Rewarding consistent engagement, loyalty, and authentic contribution should be at the heart of any community-first approach. Otherwise, the slogan risks becoming hollow, a marketing tagline detached from the lived reality of its supporters.

kucink · 1259· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back1,488 of 1,947 · most upvoted firstMore ›