MON Protocol 🐉 $MON

2 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 72, above 14% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · Apr 2026

Failed to deliver on core promises around $MON token allocation timing and game development, with community participation in quests and early investment yielding minimal returns. Token price collapsed amid widespread dumping, and trust eroded as NFT hype replaced substantive product delivery.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 0

“''Promises made were not kept''”For about 6 months, the community collected points by doing Mon quest tasks and they managed the airdrop day very badly. The time people spent on the project was a waste. However, they are implementing a scenario different from the promises made in the first days for the token sales they prepared for the community, of which I am a participant. They divided the token allocation day for the community sale winners into more months than they stated. And they managed a very bad token price process in the same way. They both gave us a vesting that would last for months and damaged our investment. Yes, these are real. I am leaving them a negative comment because they are not fair and honest with their community in this regard. Ethos is a good thing.

Skyroncorax · 1322· 1y ago · negative20

“Disappointing”I invested in $25k into $MON but this product could not have been more destined for zero. Games were never delivered, and hype was mostly around the fact that the NFTs pumped. While they do continue to deliver things ... I think .. they've completely lost the community along the way. This token is trading at a pitiful mcap because basically everyone just dumped it. I would not invest in anything the founders put together again.

Serpin Taxt · 2000· 6mo ago · negative13

2 of 2 · most upvoted first