MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%jeff.hl↑1.0%VouchesTucosalamanca943 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍MMatt25 WHUF → Rahulxero.hlMazzy 🇫🇷10 WHUF → BboatReviewsMark Karpelèspositive · 107 upvotesRiyonegative · 75 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 65 upvotesTbeagle ⨀positive · 19 upvotes
Profile· Questionable@network3_aiOn Ethos
Network3

Network3

4 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 4 reviews· Influence factor 1, above 0% of accounts

What people say

Received · 4Given · 0
“Project Scam”I ran a node in this project and at first everything sounded so promising. But reality was very different. The listing kept getting delayed, and when it finally happened the community started dumping tokens. The worst part was that the team itself was the first to dump, even though they were supposed to have locks. The airdrop gave people only 2–3 dollars, and it wasn’t about the money - it was about the way the community was treated. After the listing the team basically disappeared. The last post on their Twitter was on January 17, and it was only about the listing. Since then, nothing. Just FUD and disappointment, while $5.5M in investments remain unexplained. I’m glad that now we have platforms like Ethos, where you can leave honest and transparent reviews about projects. That is exactly what the community needs, and I believe Ethos has a great future ahead.vsdkk · 1398· 1y ago · negative9
“Time Spent, Value Missed”I ran a node, claimed badges, and followed the steps end to end and the final drop was about $2. That outcome doesn’t justify the hours of setup, monitoring, and constant check‑ins, especially when the expectations set by early communications hinted at something more substantial. What disappointed me most wasn’t a single glitch, but the overall reward design. The economics felt misaligned with the workload, and the lack of clear, upfront projections made it hard to judge whether the effort was worth it. As it stands, this felt like wasted time; without transparent accruals, better base rates, and realistic guidance, it’s not something I’d recommend.Володимир Вагилевич (Ø,G) π² · 1432· 1y ago · negative7
“Excellent case of the scam in crypto”Yes, I see this project as a great example of how the world is hard and cruel. The project raised millions of dollars from investors at an early stage. The idea of the project was simple and did not stand out among many others in the market. What happened then? The project went to market. It came out badly. The drone was thrown at users for 3-5$. It lasted half a year and closed. At the same time, the early investors did not even get their tokens, because they have on tokenomics a year of cliff after TGE. That’s it. The only people who made money in this whole story was the project team. They did it beautifully and went off into the sunset.Alex Dark · 1295· 1y ago · negative6
“Skam”I was very disappointed with this project. I held the node for about six months, but in the end, it turned out to be a scam because we only received the tokens after the token had already been rolled outTonni · 1307· 1y ago · negative2
4 of 4 · most upvoted first