MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%VouchesDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → d1namitSamorityanin🧢20 WHUF → Stonks SurferReviewsMark Karpelèspositive · 84 upvotes一川drive 🔴positive · 82 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 69 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 44 upvotes
Profile· Questionable@pigskindotfunOn Ethos
Pigskin Fantasy Football

Pigskin Fantasy Football

11 reviews, 9% of them positive.9% positive · 11 reviews· Influence factor 17, above 3% of accounts

What people say

Received · 11Given · 0
“RED FLAG”Stay away from this project. It’s such a bad copy of Football.Fun that it’s obvious it was thrown together in just a few days. Their Twitter posts are sloppy and all AI generated. The website design is just a ready made template with the text swapped out, and as soon as they opened the Twitter account, they immediately started raising money. Definitely a red flag, avoid at all costs.Rick Coin Doctor · 1512· 1y ago · negative22
“Just copycat”recently launched but its just a copychat and seems like rushed to get peoples money.MCG.eth · 1265· 1y ago · negative18
“Looking bad.”Steer clear of this project. It’s a blatant rip-off of Football.Fun, clearly slapped together in a matter of days. Their X posts are messy and obviously AI-generated. The website is just a generic template with swapped-out text, and right after launching their X account, they started soliciting funds.ugurockz.base.eth · 1286· 1y ago · negative18
“Seems rushed”Seems like a rushed project that came to capitalize on the success of football dot fun. The whole front end is clearly ai generated and done very quickly and they don't have any working product yet and have raised a presale for the project. Would change my mind later if they could show a working project and put at least some effort into the website and productkevbob | FOMO mode · 1384· 1y ago · negative20
“You cant rush things like this”Recently launched and already made a presale, which looks shady. When you are trying to make something newe, you shouldnt rush things in a shady waySensei · 1314· 1y ago · negative17
“Learning from Past Losses”I generally stay away from projects that copy others, as I usually end up losing. That’s why I will always keep my distance from you too.serkan · 1493· 1y ago · negative13
“Rushed copycat”It´s obviously trying to jump into the FDF bandwagon, and while I´m in favor of healthy competition this looks like they rushed it into production. Player pics are poor AI slop and the whole site its clunky Also its a very bad look to start asking, specially when your product have so many rough edges still, makes it seem like a cash grab, not saying it it, but many of us got that vibes, more so after so many changes and problems with the presale I´d stay out of it until they get their product on track and start showing actual long time commitmentCisco | Canft · 1269· 1y ago · negative13
“So unprofessional”Even though I aped into the presale (and actually got fucked), I’m going to fud the project because the team is doing everything wrong. Every aspect of how they’re bringing this project to users is poorly executed The project is just a copy paste of FDF They’re changing the odds of getting players in real-time. For example, early presale participants got completely fucked because they ended up with almost zero rare players Devs can’t control the supply of cards after the presale. Users were only allowed to buy 7% of the total card supply during presale, but after it sold out, you could still get players that were supposedly sold out Don't forget backed by alliancedaophoenix · 1579· 1y ago · negative10
“Presale whiplash undermines trust”I value experiments, but Pigskin’s presale rollout left me uneasy. In late August 2025 you raised pack purchase limits mid-presale after many wallets hit caps; on September 1, 2025 you announced full refunds to all presale participants. That sequence reads like reactive ops rather than a plan. Changing limits after money’s committed skews fairness and makes risk tough to model; the blanket refund signals the design wasn’t ready. I’d rather see fixed rules, a public commit on caps, and clear contingency criteria published upfront. Thanks for processing refunds quickly, but until launch discipline matches the hype, I’m sitting out.Kykyna · 1402· 1y ago · negative13
“Relatively new project”This project is kinda new to the space and seems to capitalize on the hype of football dot fun. However this one specializes in American football. I have never being a fun of ponzis but let's see how it goes.Kenny akon · 1429· 1y ago · neutral9
“Rushed a delivery - but made things right”The pigskin team saw the success of football.fun and tried to rush their NFL product. They saw the market for football.fun and saw a gap that they tried to jump on. It seemed clear that things were rushed and were not going as planned. They ultimately refunded everyone from what I have seen and I think that deserves a positive upvote as a result. Hopefully, they can sit back and launch the product again, once all their ducks are in a row.AI_TheAnswer · 1599· 1y ago6
11 of 11 · most upvoted first