Profile· Questionable@scrollxbt On Ethos

scroll

2 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · May 2026

Known for repeatedly changing names and deleting posts; has solicited wallet addresses across multiple chains (Sui, Solana, EVM, Hype) via Twitter in exchange for rewards with unclear follow-through. Associated with @token_works project, which faced scrutiny over improper NFT burn mechanics and premature ERC-20 token contract creation that circumvented intended fee structures.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 0

“奇怪的帳號”這個人多次更換名字，也曾嘗試推出項目或是私人群組，並刪掉過無數篇文章這個還帳號獲得一些知名kol甚至是founder的關注，並且非常會製造熱度當哪一條鏈有熱度他就會跑去該條鏈，在推特上寫文要求你留下錢包地址，以換取獎勵，即便他可能從來沒有送出獎勵過，據我觀察我已經看過他寫了sui、sol、evm、hype等收集錢包的文章，用途不明 https://x.com/boithekid/status/1943435245132615765?s=20 https://x.com/boithekid/status/1946560763025293754?s=20

大鬧 Danao · 1389· 9mo ago · negative5

“Scam or Mistake?”In the upcoming launch of the new project @token_works, out of 10,000 NFTs, one was burned, but it was not burned through the Burn And Launch function. Instead, it was burned using the Buy and Burn NFT function. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9aaa9bea39b5ecb53120048e985b363f14e58b646e09eeba19770776a87e04ac Moreover, the ERC-20 token contract itself had already been created before the NFT was burned. As a result, the Ten Thousand Tokens fee mechanics would not have been applied to this token. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x89d740943db5a56368002531d3f4595a2f2cc6eb5e00c1e31e94b5cac0159ef3 This guy is not doing proper research and should not be trusted. https://x.com/boithekid/status/2056488139389079585 On GMGN this token (0xc9aecc70c8233e7fac75fbd5588a035d56b95fff) displayed as HoneyPot or Malicious code.

Yefym · 1238· 5mo ago · negative0

2 of 2 · most upvoted first